Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Says Dems in Congress on "Crusade" to "Destroy" AG

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:35 PM
Original message
White House Says Dems in Congress on "Crusade" to "Destroy" AG
White House accuses Democrats of Gonzales "crusade"
Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:32PM EDT
By Stuart Grudgings

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House accused congressional Democrats on Friday of waging a crusade to bring down U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales after lawmakers sought a perjury probe against him.

The criticism came a day after testimony by FBI Director Robert Mueller raised questions about Gonzales' credibility under questioning by Democratic lawmakers.

Mueller told a congressional hearing he had serious reservations about a warrantless domestic spying program that Gonzales testified drew little disagreement within the administration.

Ratcheting up the bitter rhetoric between the administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Senate Democrats were determined to get Gonzales.

"They have deliberately had this crusade against him to try to destroy the attorney general," Perino told reporters.

Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer of New York brushed off charges his party was trying to destroy Gonzales. "For sure, he has already destroyed himself," Schumer said in a statement.

more...

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2720557520070727?src=072707_1619_TOPSTORY_gonzales_crusade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure Yeah Whatever
The man's a liar and shouldn't be in office. Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. "For sure, he has already destroyed himself," Schumer said
Right on,Schumer!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, yeah....only the Bush white house would try to make this sound like a Bad Thing.
Meanwhile, in the real world, concerted efforts to bring lawbreakers to justice are generally considered good things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. This AG is so bad, why shouldn't they be on a crusade after him?
What, because Bush finds such an incompetent personally convenient for himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's doing a pretty good job of it himself
we don't need no stinkin' "crusades".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. When did Schumer become Yoda?
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 04:39 PM by WilliamPitt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Replace the word "crusade"
with the phrase "attempt to preserve the Constitution" and it would be an accurate statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Perino is a shrill nut
I wonder sometimes if she realizes that when she's talking to the press she's not posting on FR or some other nutcase website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. When it is reported that the The White House said blah, blah
does that mean the President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Schumer had a good comback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. WELL, Shame On US!
We should do something valuable, like crucifying a man who gets his dick sucked by a consenting adult!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gonzales makes it so easy for the dems
there's no need to be on a "crusade" against him. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nice sound byte, but why?
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 05:20 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
Only the most partisan of people will take this at face value and not ask that question.

What this attempt really shows to me is that they're terrified of losing some of their base over all this. Not just their fringe, but old school Republicans whose votes they always knew they could depend on.

Well, when all is said and done they'll still have that 30 or so percent that don't bother to think or question still supporting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cry me a f'n river
so much spin, so little equilibrium...

Somebody let me off this carousel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. I remember Nixon trying to rally support by crying, "They're attacking the Presidency!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ya, like the Dem's
have nothing else to do but crusade against a proven liar hell bent on hanging on while destroying his own career in spite of literally everyone but Bu$h telling him he needs to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. First we are Godless,
and now we are on a crusade, make up your mind you fucking idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fucking perp did that all
'imself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. I am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why is the response never "You bet!"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. That's because..
... the AG is on a crusade to destroy our Constitution. Yes, our Constitution is more important than that lying weasel little douchebag of a would-be man.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC