Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice not served-Gonzales has used office for political purposes-By Sen. PATRICK LEAHY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:07 AM
Original message
Justice not served-Gonzales has used office for political purposes-By Sen. PATRICK LEAHY
Justice not served
Gonzales has used office for political purposes
July 29, 2007

By Sen. PATRICK LEAHY

Three months ago, when Attorney General Roberto Gonzales last appeared before this committee, I said that the Department of Justice was experiencing a crisis of leadership perhaps unrivaled during its history. Unfortunately, that crisis has not abated.

Until there is independence, transparency and accountability, it will continue. The attorney general has lost the confidence of the Congress and the American people. Through oversight we hope to restore balance and accountability to the executive branch. The Department of Justice must be restored to be worthy of its name. It should not be reduced to another political arm of the White House. The trust and confidence of the American people in federal law enforcement must be restored.

With the department shrouded in scandal, the deputy attorney general has announced his resignation. The nominee to become associate attorney general requested that his nomination be withdrawn rather than testify under oath at a confirmation hearing. The attorney general's chief of staff, the deputy attorney general's chief of staff, the department's White House liaison and the White House political director have all resigned, as have others. I would joke that the last one out the door should turn out the lights, but the Department of Justice is too important for that – we need to shine more light there, not less.

The investigation into the firing for partisan purposes of U.S. attorneys, who had been appointed by this president, along with an ever-growing series of controversies and scandals have revealed an administration driven by a vision of an all-powerful executive over our constitutional system of checks and balances that values loyalty over judgment, secrecy over openness and ideology over competence.

more at:
http://www.timesargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070729/FEATURES05/707290304/1014/FEATURES05
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. So what is he going to do about it -- tell us that over and over
he should get his butt in gear and make arrangements to have him removed. That is the only way to tell the evil smirking monster in the white house he ain't no damn dictator. AND that he can be removed also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Really! You just realized that the DOJ, and the whole Bush team....
have told you to go shit in your hat. This has been going on for months, and now we're going to see if they'll honor your subpoenas?(Leahy) Maybe if you get on your knees, they'll be nice to you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. What is that familiar, rotten smell?
"What the White House stonewalling is preventing is conclusive evidence of who made the decisions to fire these federal prosecutors. We know from the testimony that it was not the president. Everyone who has testified has said that he was not involved. None of the senior officials at the Department of Justice could testify how people were added to the list or the real reasons that people were included among the federal prosecutors to be replaced. Indeed, the evidence we have been able to collect points to Karl Rove and the political operatives at the White House. The stonewalling by the White House raises the question: What is it that the White House is so desperate to hide?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Prima facie evidence that everyone who testified lied...
"We know from the testimony that it was not the president. Everyone who has testified has said that he was not involved."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Might not be a lie...
That's not the smell I was referring to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. the smell of a gonzales impeachment, perhaps?
Fox couldn't get a single GOPer to defend him today. For those up for reelection this could be just the thing to try to show their 'independence' from "BrandBushRepublicanism". That would be exceptionally bad news for the president - as the NYT points out today - it is in the WH best interest to keep gonzo there - as it appears that his machinations are solely to protect the WH and obstruct justice. It could get very, very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. OK, Bush may not be the Prime Mover
(I'm not sure he's even the Prime Mover for his own bowels), but I betcha he's complicit. Betcha Turdblossom just had to tell Shrubby what he was up to so Shrubby could further appreciate how clever Turdblossom is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Read the fourth paragraph of this editorial very carefully:
"Both men say that in March 2004 — when Mr. Gonzales was still the White House counsel — the Justice Department refused to endorse a continuation of the wiretapping program because it was illegal. (Mr. Comey was running the department temporarily because Attorney General John Ashcroft had emergency surgery.) Unwilling to accept that conclusion, Vice President Dick Cheney sent Mr. Gonzales and another official to Mr. Ashcroft’s hospital room to get him to approve the wiretapping."

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/opinion/29sun1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I take your point.
Cheney was the prime mover. Thanks. I was being rather dense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocky2007 Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. So desperate to hide?
What if that secret were about the war in Iraq --- as in "a smoke and mirror game". Distract the population with the war while undermining our government and raking in the war profits.

I read today that 2 plus trillion $ is unaccountable for during this administration. Billions in mismanagement in rebuilding Iraq. Contractors being awarded billions of dollars. Hallaburton earning unheard of profits. ---------- Cheney is at the head of the line controlling things, and as the past CEO, I am sure will reap his rewards at some point. (hope that battery replacement was a cheap far Eastern knock off),

Bushie, Rove and Gonzo could also be standing in that income line -- the ripple down could be endless.

Red October at it's worst! Could they really try doing this?

Sadly, I think that is exactly what is happening ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. You know, if there are some Democratic senators who were informed on Bush's secret surveillance
program--the one that Gonzales is spinning like a top to cover up...maybe they should JUST TELL US WHAT IT IS! If Scooter f***ing Libby can walk free after blowing open an entire undercover CIA network, it's really, really hard to see how a "gentleman's agreement" can hold water concerning the complete subversion of the United States Constitution.

Anything else is conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC