Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The NAFTA Superhighway

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:17 PM
Original message
The NAFTA Superhighway

The NAFTA Superhighway

by CHRISTOPHER HAYES

(from the August 27, 2007 issue)

When completed, the highway will run from Mexico City to Toronto, slicing through the heartland like a dagger sunk into a heifer at the loins and pulled clean to the throat. It will be four football fields wide, an expansive gully of concrete, noise and exhaust, swelled with cars, trucks, trains and pipelines carrying water, wires and God knows what else. Through towns large and small it will run, plowing under family farms, subdevelopments, acres of wilderness. Equipped with high-tech electronic customs monitors, freight from China, offloaded into nonunionized Mexican ports, will travel north, crossing the border with nary a speed bump, bound for Kansas City, where the cheap goods manufactured in booming Far East factories will embark on the final leg of their journey into the nation's Wal-Marts.

And this NAFTA Superhighway, as it is called, is just the beginning, the first stage of a long, silent coup aimed at supplanting the sovereign United States with a multinational North American Union.

Even as this plot unfolds in slow motion, the mainstream media are silent; politicians are in denial. Yet word is getting out. Like samizdat, info about the highway has circulated in niche media platforms old and new, on right-wing websites like WorldNetDaily, in the pages of low-circulation magazines like the John Birch Society's The New American and increasingly on the letters to the editor page of local newspapers.

"Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes. Will the last person please take down the flag?" There are many more where that came from. "The superhighway has the potential to cripple the West Coast economy, as well as posing an enormous security breach at our border," read a letter from the January 7 San Francisco Chronicle. "So far, there has been no public participation or debate on this important issue. Public participation and debate must begin now."

In some senses it has. Prompted by angry phone calls and e-mail from their constituents, local legislators are beginning to take action. In February the Montana state legislature voted 95 to 5 for a resolution opposing "the North American Free Trade Agreement Superhighway System" as well as "any effort to implement a trinational political, government entity among the United States, Canada, and Mexico." Similar resolutions have been introduced in eighteen other states as well as the House of Representatives, where H. Con Res. 40 has attracted, as of this writing, twenty-seven co-sponsors. Republican presidential candidates in Iowa and New Hampshire now routinely face hostile questions about the highway at candidate forums. Citing a spokesperson for the Romney campaign, the Concord Monitor reports that "the road comes up at town meetings second only to immigration policy."

Grassroots movement exposes elite conspiracy and forces politicians to respond: It would be a heartening story but for one small detail.

There's no such thing as a proposed NAFTA Superhighway.

Though opposition to the nonexistent highway is the cause célèbre of many a paranoiac, the myth upon which it rests was not fabricated out of whole cloth. Rather, it has been sewn together from scraps of fact.

more


Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway

Bush makes power grab

Jerome Corsi, Swift Liar's specialty.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. NAFTA Superhighway has Giuliani as key player
At the center of negotiations for multiple legs of the Superhighway Corridor throughout Texas, is none other than Rudolph Giuliani's law firm which landed the Comprehensive Development Agreement for a widening of Interstate-35, now referred to as the TTC-35, in addition to the Master Development Plans for State Highways 121 and 130 among other legs of the TTC. All negotiations for Cintra were and are presently handled by the law firm, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP, of which Republican Presidential candidate, Rudolph Giuliani, has been a senior executive partner since March 2005. His law firm is the exclusive legal counsel for Cintra. Bracewell & Giuliani is comprised of 400 attorneys, based in Houston, TX with offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., London and Kazakhstan.

Cintra joined with San Antonio, TX-based Zachry Construction Corp. to help land the contracts, in which Zachry owns a 20% interest. The Cintra-Zachry proposal for TTC-35 includes a private investment of up to $6 billion in upfront payments for the complete construction, design and operation of a 316-mile toll road between Dallas and San Antonio, giving Cintra the right to set tolls and keep toll road profits for a period of 50 years, as it will for each road it has contracted.

The NAFTA Superhighway and its corridors will run from Southwestern Mexico through Laredo, Austin and Dallas, TX, into Kansas City, KA, serving as an inland customs port. The corridor will split in Kansas with one leg going to Winnipeg, Canada through Omaha, NE. The other leg goes to Toronto, Canada through Des Moines, IA, Chicago, IL and Detroit, MI.

As many as 10 lanes, one-mile wide will incorporate double rails and pipelines. The second corridor is planned from Brownsville to Houston, TX through Arkansas, Memphis, TN and into Norfolk, VA. While the principal use for these corridors is to speed Asian goods into the Central and Eastern U.S., it will require 145 acres of land per mile or 540,000 total acres of land. And in Texas, the state may utilize its own discretion in using eminent domain law in order to reach its goal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did you miss the part where it says that the highway doesn't exist?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Funny that this is getting recommendations - are people reading to the end of the article??
The NAFTA Superhighway doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Texas corridor is set to begin construction
And Mexican trucks are being allowed in under a pilot program.

The Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) is ready to begin construction in 2007, building the first segment of what is planned to be a NAFTA Super Highway stretching from Mexico to Canada. As we have previously written, the NAFTA Super Highway is planned to begin at Laredo, Tex., proceeding north to Kansas City via Oklahoma City, and ultimately connecting with Canadian limited-access highways north of Duluth, Minn.


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=15682
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're an Edwards supporter linking to an article by a Swift Liar?
OK!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. You know I hate Jerome Corsi
But this makes sense to me. There's two strong unions left to bust, Teamsters and Longshoremen. This whacks them both in one fell swoop. I don't know Corsi's angle and I don't care to. I am worried about our trucking and port union workers though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Worrying about unions is one thing, but this is about
creating a super conspiracy to ratchet fear. What does this have to do with unions and trucking?

Never mind that a FBI intelligence report of the Joint Terrorism Task Force reported that an illegal human-smuggling ring has been bringing Iraqis across the border illegally for more than a year after reckoning that it was more lucrative (at $20K-$25K a pop) to smuggle Iraqis than Mexicans.

And, let's not take into account experiences and warnings the Congressional Research Service documented, or the actions Congress took:


* On March 23, 2005, George Bush hosted meetings in Texas with President Fox and Prime Minister Martin, in which the leaders established the trilateral “Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America.” The SPP will seek to advance the common security and the common prosperity of the countries through expanded cooperation and harmonization of policies.

* According to the Department of Homeland Security, from FY2001 to FY2005, there were 144 border incursions by the Mexican military. Dialogue with the Mexican military has reduced the frequency of such incursions by half. (Never mind that we're "dialoguing" with bordering military invaders but can't do that with Middle Eastern nations with disparate political views, whom we would rather provoke). A recent Mexican military border incursion netted US law enforcement 1,400 pounds of pot, later disavowed by the Mexican government as "drug traffickers, not Mexican military. (OK, pare that back to 143 border incursions, for the sake of "diplomacy"...)

* On January 26, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced the discovery of a tunnel from Tijuana to a warehouse in San Diego. Mexican officials seized 2 tons of marijuana, and U.S. officials seized 200 pounds of marijuana. The 2,400-foot long tunnel is the longest tunnel ever found at the the U.S.-Mexican border.

* In testimony before the Investigations Subcommittee of the House Committee on Homeland Security on February 7, Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar indicated that assaults against border patrol agents are increasing. In FY2005, 778 border patrol agents were assaulted, and 192 have been assaulted in FY2006. This is a significant increase from FY2004, when 374 border patrol agents were assaulted.

* National Intelligence Director John Negroponte named Mexico in his Annual Threat Assessment for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence as a country of concern regarding the capacity of drug trafficking organizations to undermine already weak state authority.

* On December 16, 2005, the House passed H.R. 4437 (Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005) that would, among other things, strengthen border security, compel employers to use a pilot system to check for employment eligibility, mandate retention of illegal immigrants, make it a crime to be in the United States illegally or to assist illegal aliens, and require the deployment of a fence and surveillance equipment along the Mexico-U.S. border.

* On May 12, 2005, (Former) President Fox stated that his government would protest the recently passed immigration measures in the FY2005 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, saying that “it is useless to pursue walls, barriers, and the use of force and violence.”



And the current Mexican president, Felipe Calderon, recently reinforced that assertion, saying that would continue to "energetically protest unilateral actions" of the U.S. Congress on the immigration front that "exacerbate the persecution of undocumented Mexicans in the U.S." He boasted that Mexican consulates in the United States have been fortified to protect the rights of millions of Mexicans living there illegally.

"Wherever there is a Mexican," he said, "that is Mexico."

It's not about a Bush-supported invasion of our national sovereignty to ingratiate him to his corporate masters in contravention of our national Constitution, though, or as his father, Bush, Sr. asserted, "the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order," it's about "free trade," right?


This is what liars like Corsi thrive on, stringing together a lot facts with embellishments and outright fiction. That's exactly what they did in 2004, and it was exactly why some people still can't separate fact from fiction. Protecting jobs and unions is one thing, conflating the issues with invasion and a new world order is ludicrous.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. *sigh* the road, the trucking, the ports
Just because Corsi has unrelated conspiracy theory rants - it doesn't mean that everybody who is concerned about this trucking route thinks like Corsi does. What about the other issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. The other issues are being discussed with out Corsi's BS!
These issues are being raised by the Teamsters and others. So I agree, it doesn't mean everyone who is concerned thinks like Corsi. It does mean that everyone who clouds the issue with the irrelevant nonsensical BS about invasion is giving credibility to Corsi's racists agenda.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. It gets very frustrating
The Dobbs type bigotry is infuriating, but the other side is that the real discussions about labor and human rights and the environment get buried under his stupid racist and communist rhetoric, just like with Corsi. I don't know if the solution is to get mired down in debunking them, or just switch the focus to what needs discussing - protecting workers and the environment around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Corsi is scum, pure and simple - but he's brought something to
light that does exist in one form or another. As you say, there are these two unions that are being whacked at one blow, and I'm worried about them too. The Inspector General for the Transportation Department has ruled that Mexican trucks do not meet safety standards. Other arguments I've heard are that while American truckers are allowed in Mexico as well, many are reluctant to go there for many reasons, including the fact that they would have to pay cash for fuel.

It's astonishing on its face that this plan would proceed without fairness to our truckers, but then I've learned to expect the worst from *'s lousy policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Did you read the article above? A direct quote:
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 07:40 PM by TwilightZone
There's no such thing as a proposed NAFTA Superhighway.

Though opposition to the nonexistent highway is the cause célèbre of many a paranoiac, the myth upon which it rests was not fabricated out of whole cloth. Rather, it has been sewn together from scraps of fact.


PS: Your source is a conservative web site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Even Corsi disputes Hayes' assertion the the Highway *doesn't exist*.
Corsi's reputation is colorful, to say it nicely, but on this topic, he is on the money, imho.



From here:


A 1998 document which WND has obtained shows the North American SuperCorridor Coalition, or NASCO, was originally named the North American Superhighway Coalition.
The document plays into an emerging debate in which a number of critics, including President Bush, want to deny that a NAFTA "Superhighway" exists.

Christopher Hayes, writing in the Aug. 27 edition of the Nation claimed that, "There is no such thing as a proposed NAFTA Superhighway."

President Bush at the third summit meeting of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America in Montebello, Quebec, on Aug. 21, answered a question from a reporter at Fox News that NAFTA Superhighways were part of a "conspiracy theory."


The document involves two 1998 letters: one, a June 10, 1998, letter written to Tiffany Newsom, executive director of NASCO, by Francisco J. Conde, editor and publisher of the Conde Report on U.S.-Mexico Relations; and the second, a June 10, 1998 letter written by Newsom to consultants at David A. Dean & Associates.

Conde addresses NASCO as North America's Superhighway Coalition and compliments Newsom and NASCO for supporting the Interstate Highway 35 Corridor Coalition consulting team at David A. Dean & Associates, P.C. and Dean International, Inc.

Newsom's letter notes the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, or TEA-21, was signed into law by President Clinton June 9, 1998.

Newsom writes, "This bill contains for the first time in history a category and funding for trade corridors and border programs."

She continues, "The I-35 corridor is the strongest and most organized of the corridor initiatives so, if we play our cards right, we stand to get a part of the $700 million."

.....(many more details at link)






This is from NASCO's home page at their website:


SuperCorridor & NAFTA Highway Defined


SuperCorridor - not "Super-sized". As defined in Webster's dictionary, "Super" means "more inclusive than a specialized category". NASCO uses the term "SuperCorridor" to demonstrate we are more than just a highway coalition. NASCO works to develop key relationships along the EXISTING corridors we represent to maximize economic development opportunities along the NASCO Corridor, as well as coordinate the development of technology integration projects, inland ports, environmental initiatives, university research, and the sharing of "best practices". NASCO is particularly focused on coordinating the efforts of local, state and federal agencies and the private sector to integrate and secure a multimodal transportation system along the existing "NASCO Corridor."

"NAFTA Superhighway" - As of late, there has been much media attention given to the "new, proposed NAFTA Superhighway". NASCO and the cities, counties, states and provinces along our existing Interstate Highways 35/29/94 (the NASCO Corridor) have been referring to I-35 as the 'NAFTA Superhighway' for many years, as I-35 already carries a substantial amount of international trade with Mexico, the United States and Canada. There are no plans to build a new NAFTA Superhighway - it exists today as I-35.




The careful parsing of words is how Bush and Co. continue to lie when they say "No one is building *a new* NAFTA Superhighway." It's already in place, waiting for *improvements.*


Another related thread here.



The secretive creation of the North American Union is a very serious development, and the NAFTA Superhighway is an integral part of it.


Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's hogwash! Colorful?
Corsi is a despicable racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "Even Corsi" - you cannot be serious.
You do realize that a) he's a Swift Boater, and b) World News Daily is a joke, right?

Sorry, but considering his record on other issues, there's little reason to believe him on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Here's another right winger who knows the score on the NAU. Bush really is a uniter.
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 08:47 PM by seafan
She's obviously angry not only about the unregulated trucks crossing the border into the US from Mexico, but also about a host of other points in the 59-page document from the Council of Foreign Relations who hatched all of these ideas.


CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada

by Phyllis Schlafly
July 13, 2005


The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

.....

"Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."
The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

.....

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."
The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."
The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).
To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.
Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

..... The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.

.....(more at link)





Flame away, but it doesn't change the facts.



On edit: And one more thing of note: The "five-year plan" she refers to in the first graf... the clock started ticking in 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Again, what does
cooperation on security have to do with all the conspiracy about invasion?

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).


So security is a code word for the conspiracy?

Anything can be turned into a devious plot by deceptive people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. That was why I recommended it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah there is no superhighway, American Union or NAFTA,
our government wouldn't try to exploit its citizens to make money for them and their corporate friends. Come on you guys this is all nonsense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. NAFTA has problems
doesn't mean that fear mongering and BS conspiracies should be given credibility.

Everybody is afraid. Congress is afraid. Americans are afraid. Boo! Boo!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sometimes we choose to lean towards covering our eyes though.
One of my older brothers told me some things when he left the Army when I was younger that I gave him shit about and called him crazy for. And again when I was one of the stupid people that believed the media and our governments lies about the war he was telling me the plan they were taking to Iran and Syria and so and that it was all just about money and control. I did think it was for oil but I said he was crazy about everything else he Believed. Now he gives me the " I'm crazy right?" line, all the time. I compare the conspiracies to the medias bullshit spin or lies about everything, it gives it balance. We should hear all the bullshit from both sides because the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. Otherwise we will to continue to have a country that looks to the media for its life decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. There were also stupid people who
believed the Swift Liars, you know, the people who the media gave a platform to in 2004, the same people pushing this current myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm not gonna defend them but I have met some people
who made very stupid comments, decisions and so on and because I didn't close them out, I also learned a couple of things from them. Its like the crazy guy on the corner thats always spitting crazy shit out of his mouth, sometimes we drive by and he says something that makes sense. I think anytime we censor people no matter who they are, we hurt ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Pointing out pathological liars
is not censorship. They can say anything they want to, but the news media should not be in the business of propping up liars. Once someone is known to be intent on deceiving others, especially a nasty racist like Corsi, anyone who chooses to believe him, well, that's on that individual.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Yeah, but often what began as a conspiracy theory becomes fact....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Calderon on SPP and criticism:
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 08:28 PM by Texas Explorer

-snip-

In the case of North America and regarding the Summit of Leaders of the Alliance for the Security and Prosperity of North America, I have reiterated my conviction that, as a region, we have not developed the enormous potential we have and we must make sure that competition from other regions of the world does not cancel our opportunities.
Mexico, Canada and the United States must be capable of using our regional advantages without damaging the sovereignty of each country, while solving the subjects of migration, organized crime and investment.

Finally, I have said that Mexico does not end at the border, that wherever there is a Mexican Mexico is there; this is why the actions of the Government in favor of our migrating countrymen is guided by principles, by the defense and protection of their rights, by prevention for detecting measures that may affect our people and by the professionalism we must offer our co-nationals.

For this reason, we are already using all the resources of our consular network for the benefit of Mexicans abroad.
On behalf of the Mexican Government, I again strongly protest the unilateral measures taken by the United States Congress and Government, measures that are making the persecution and humiliating treatment of undocumented Mexican workers worse.

The insensitivity shown toward those who contribute a great deal to the economy and to society in the United States has been incentive to redouble our battle to gain recognition of their enormous contribution to the economies of both nations and to defend their rights.

Therefore, the Government of Mexico will continue to firmly insist to both countries’ societies and Governments on the necessity of comprehensive immigration reform and of categorically rejecting construction of a wall on our common border.

http://www.presidencia.gob.mx/en/press/?contenido=31601

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. 200 Mexican trucking companies came in this week.. Si senor,
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 08:41 PM by B Calm
15 cents a mile, home every three weeks. Just doing the runs you Americans are too lazy or don't want to do..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well, I don't know about any superhighways, but you have heard of the Trans Texas Corridor, no?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Texas_Corridor

Yet another scam to make corporate cronies richer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. That's part of it. I don't know why people are saying this doesn't exist.
The "Trans-Texas" part is first... but the plans are to extend it all the way to Canada.

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. For anybody who quotes Jerome CORSI approvingly on DU:
First, MORE quotes from the o.p.'s link:

*******QUOTE*******

.... Grassroots movement exposes elite conspiracy and forces politicians to respond: It would be a heartening story but for one small detail.

There's no such thing as a proposed NAFTA Superhighway. ....

In his essay "The Paranoid Style in American Politics," Richard Hofstadter famously sketched the contours of the American tradition of folk conspiracy--a tradition that has, at different times, seen its enemy in Masons, Jesuits, immigrants, Jews and Eastern bankers. There's certainly a strong continuity between that tradition and the populist/nationalist ire that drives the NAFTA highway myth. Hofstadter's original essay was motivated in part by the activities of the John Birch Society, which today is one of the leading purveyors of the highway myth.

But there's something more. The myth of the NAFTA Superhighway persists and grows because it taps into deeply felt anxieties about the dizzying dislocations of twenty-first-century global capitalism: a nativist suspicion of Mexico's designs on US sovereignty, a longing for national identity, the fear of terrorism and porous borders, a growing distrust of the privatizing agenda of a government happy to sell off the people's assets to the highest bidder and a contempt for the postnational agenda of Davos-style neoliberalism. Indeed, the image of the highway, with its Chinese goods whizzing across the border borne by Mexican truckers on a privatized, foreign-operated road, is almost mundane in its plausibility. If there was a NAFTA highway, you could bet that Tom Friedman would be for it--what could be more flattening than miles of concrete paved across the continent?--and Lou Dobbs would be zealously opposed. In fact, Dobbs has devoted a segment of his show to the highway, its nonexistence notwithstanding. "These three countries moving ahead their governments without authorization from the American people, without Congressional approval," he said. "This is as straightforward an attack on national sovereignty as there could be outside of war."

Though the story of the highway has been seeded and watered in the fertile soil of the nationalist right wing--promoted by Birchers and Corsi, co-author of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth's book about John Kerry--it also stretches across ideological and partisan lines. Like immigration and the Dubai ports deal, it divides the Republican coalition against itself, pitting the capitalists against the nationalists. And more than a few on the center-left have voiced criticisms as well: Teamsters president James Hoffa wrote in a column last year that "Bush is quietly moving forward with plans...for what's known as a NAFTA superhighway--a combination of existing and new roads that would create a north-south corridor from Mexico to Canada.... It would allow global conglomerates to capitalize by exploiting cheap labor and nonexistent work rules and avoiding potential security enhancements at U.S. ports." Democratic Congresswoman Nancy Boyda, from eastern Kansas, invoked its specter early and often in her improbably successful 2006 campaign against Republican incumbent Jim Ryun. A campaign circular inserted in local newspapers warned that "if built, this 'Super Corridor' would be a quarter-mile wide and longer than the Great Wall of China." Boyda told me that her attacks on the highway "hit a real nerve because enough people had the same concerns." ....

Texas Transportation commissioner Ric Williamson is one of those Texas personalities who seem almost self-consciously to will themselves toward caricature. One Democratic staffer in the Capitol casually referred to him as Darth Vader; Texas Monthly recently called him "the most hated person in Texas." Owner of a natural gas production company before becoming a state legislator in 1985, he has lately been reincarnated as a transit policy wonk, a role he plays as a cross between mid-twentieth-century road builder Robert Moses and J.R. Ewing from Dallas: the planner as good old boy. He does not suffer from a lack of confidence. "We're the greatest state agency you'll ever interview," he told me at one point. With his good friend Governor Perry hemorrhaging political capital, it's fallen to Williamson to advocate for the corridor and draw fire from its opponents. ....

But what people like Williamson don't seem to understand is how disempowered people feel in the face of a neoliberal order whose direction they cannot influence. For corporatists within both parties (Williamson, it should be noted, was a Democrat while in the Statehouse), selling port security or road concessions to a multinational is inevitable, logical, obvious. To thousands of average citizens in Texas and elsewhere, it's madness or, worse, treason. Both the actual TTC and the mythical NAFTA Superhighway represent a certain kind of future for America, one in which the crony capitalism of oil-rich Texas expands to fill every last crevice of the public sector's role, eclipsing the relevance of the national government as both the provider of public goods and the unified embodiment of a sovereign people.


********UNQUOTE*******



AND THEN, Corsi's Swiftbotting, Minuteman a-hole background, as featured frequently on George "I wannabe Art BELL" NOORY's Coast to Coast:

************QUOTE*************

http://www.spp.gov/

Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America




http://www.spp.gov/myths_vs_facts.asp Text
Myth vs. Fact
Myth: The SPP was an agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.

Fact: The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact, no agreement was ever signed.

Myth: The SPP is a movement to merge the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union and establish a common currency.

Fact: The cooperative efforts under the SPP, which can be found in detail at www.spp.gov, seek to make the United States, Canada and Mexico open to legitimate trade and closed to terrorism and crime. It does not change our courts or legislative processes and respects the sovereignty of the United States, Mexico, and Canada. The SPP in no way, shape or form considers the creation of a European Union-like structure or a common currency. The SPP does not attempt to modify our sovereignty or currency or change the American system of government designed by our Founding Fathers. ....more



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_and_Prosperity_Partnership_of_North_America

Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.... Canadian criticism has also been directed at the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), a committee made up of 10 CEOs each from Mexico, the United States and Canada, which has been asked to reduce the over 300 recommendations in the SPP down to about 30 achievable goals. NACC members include CEOs from Wal-Mart, Chevron, Lockheed Martin, FedEx, General Electric and Ford, among others. Of the ten Canadian CEOs on the NACC, nine are members of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the driving force behind the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the Canadian representative on the trinational Task Force on the Future of North America, whose recommendations led to the creation of the SPP.

The NACC will meet with government reps from all three countries to discuss their proposals in September 2006.


http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965

North American Union to Replace USA?


by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 19, 2006

.... President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union: ....


http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15497

Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway


by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted Jun 12, 2006

.... A good reason Bush does not want to secure the border with Mexico may be that the administration is trying to create express lanes for Mexican trucks to bring containers with cheap Far East goods into the heart of the U.S., all without the involvement of any U.S. union workers on the docks or in the trucks.

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15623

North American Union Would Trump U.S. Supreme Court


by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted Jun 19, 2006

The Bush Administration is pushing to create a North American Union out of the work on-going in the Department of Commerce under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America in the NAFTA office headed by Geri Word. A key part of the plan is to expand the NAFTA tribunals into a North American Union court system that would have supremacy over all U.S. law, even over the U.S. Supreme Court, in any matter related to the trilateral political and economic integration of the United States, Canada and Mexico. ....

http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=246

Coming soon to U.S.: Mexican customs office


Monday, June 05, 2006 by Jerome R. Corsi -- Kansas City is planning to allow the Mexican government to open a Mexican customs office in conjunction with the Kansas City SmartPort. This will be the first foreign customs facility allowed to operate on U.S. soil.

Southern border blurs for global trade


Thursday, June 01, 2006 by Jerome R. Corsi -- The Texas segment of the NAFTA Super Corridor is moving rapidly toward approval. When built, the Trans-Texas Corridor, or TTC, will be a major super-highway with six lanes mo ...

Bush border policy linked to Carlyle deal?


Tuesday, May 23, 2006 by Jerome R. Corsi -- In January 2004, the Carlyle Group put together a new team to begin investing in Mexico. The team consisted of Luis T鬬ez, who was then an executive vice president of Desc, one of Mexico's larges ...

Immigration reform spells death for GOP


Friday, May 19, 2006 by Jerome R. Corsi -- To measure what exactly the Senate is doing in putting together a "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" bill, we have to ask what is going to change after the bill is passed: No illegal immigrant currently in the United Stat ...

Border fence will never be built


Thursday, May 18, 2006 by Jerome R. Corsi -- The Senate voted to approve the amendment submitted by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., to build a 370-mile section of triple-layered fence along the Mexican border. Now the Bush administration is trying to push this as a victory for conservative ...


http://mediamatters.org/items/200408060010

MMFA investigates: Who is Jerome Corsi, co-author of Swift Boat Vets attack book?


....
• Corsi on Islam: "a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion"

• Corsi on Catholicism: "Boy buggering in both Islam and Catholicism is okay with the Pope as long as it isn't reported by the liberal press"

• Corsi on Muslims: "RAGHEADS are Boy-Bumpers as clearly as they are Women-Haters -- it all goes together"

• Corsi on "John F*ing Commie Kerry": "After he married TerRAHsa, didn't John Kerry begin practicing Judiasm? He also has paternal grandparents that were Jewish. What religion is John Kerry?"

• Corsi on Senator "FAT HOG" Clinton: "Anybody ask why HELLary couldn't keep BJ Bill satisfied? Not lesbo or anything, is she?" ....

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. Won't be long before they are quoting the Klan

When you have people that stand with Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, and Swift boat liars I don't think there will be much surprise when one of them quotes the Klan to support isolationism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. Much of this does exist, and to pass it all off as being
"sewn together by scraps of fact" is to dilute the weight of those scraps.

There is planning and funding of international trade corridors. Where this will lead is anyone's guess, and since *, the unthinkable has more or less become the rule.

#18 - Corridor from Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, through Port Huron, Michigan, southwesterly along Interstate Route 69 through Indianapolis, Indiana, through Evansville, Indiana, Memphis, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Shreveport / Bossier Louisiana, to Houston, Texas, and to the Lower Rio Grande Valley at the border between the United States and Mexico, as follows:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep10/nhs/hipricorridors/index.html

(a map not unlike the infamous NASCO map)
http://www.borderplanning.fhwa.dot.gov/tradecorridors.asp

There's also planning by the CFR (no small player in shaping United States policies)
for integration of security forces and economy of the Northern hemisphere, http://www.cfr.org/publication/7955/north_america_the_beautiful.html

and discussions on a common currency ('when the time is right').
http://www.cfr.org/publication/8138/building_a_north_american_community.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
27. Eeek More Brown-Skinned People...RUN!!!
Now where do these Mexican trucks come from? I keep hearing how we're going to be over run by the Frito Bandito and how the interstate out my door will soon have Spanish road signs and Taco Bells replacing the Wendys at the toll plazas.

OK...now are these Mexicans androids or zombies? What's being sent across the border in "chebby trucks" (said in his best Cheech Marin accent)? Bombs? "Terrerists"? More like stuff going to your neighborhood Walmart...in trucks paid for by American corporations looking for "always the lowest price"...and as long as people want those low prices, the truck will roll.

Sorry...I see a problem with immigration, but with those who do the hiring...the same people who headed across the Mexican border 15 years ago...closing up thousands of American jobs to exploit cheap labor in Mexico...and continue to profit from the non-unionized conditions south of the border that hurts not only American workers, but have created conditions where many Mexicans are willing to take the chance of coming here to make in one week what they earn in one month in Mexico. And this is their fault? Damn them for being Mexican. They should just stay south of the border, play quiet serfs and leave my Walmart alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why is it bad?
It's a large size, will probably include a rail line somewhere, and allows more efficient transport of goods. If peak oil is looming, the more we can streamline all transport processes seems a logical thing to do?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. It's busting two big unions
Teamsters and Longshoremen. But hey, what do I know. It's not like I called the investor/servant class society a decade ago or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. I know that here in Texas, the plans are for it not to have too many
off- or on-ramps... since its primary purpose for haluing merchandise, not public traffic. That's got a lot of people in smaller Texas towns very upset, cause they'll be paying for it, but they won't be able to use it.

Since the people planning it see no reason to allow heavy use of it by commuters, I don't know how much stock I'd put in *hopes* that they'll allow rail service on it. That'd sure be an upside, but at this point there's so many down sides, well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC