Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court bans Christian cross on private land in public park - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 04:56 AM
Original message
Court bans Christian cross on private land in public park - Reuters
Source: Reuters

Court bans Christian cross on private land in public park
Thu Sep 6, 2007 3:59PM EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The U.S. government cannot
trade a parcel of land to private hands to allow a
Christian cross to remain in the middle of a vast federal
preserve, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Thursday.

At issue is the Establishment Clause of the U.S.
Constitution, which bars the government from favoring
any one religion, as it applies to a lone white metal
Latin cross in the Mojave National Preserve in southern
California between Los Angeles and Las Vegas.

In 2004, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled
that a cross on a prominent rock on public land was
unconstitutional, prompting Congress to pass a law
allowing a trade so its immediate area would become
private land.

People have been putting crosses in the spot since the
1930s, most recently with one man drilling a metal cross
into the rock a decade ago without permission. In 1999,
a man requested and was denied permission to build a
Buddhist shrine there, setting the stage for a tangled
legal fight.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0619680720070906
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good for the Court. Always nice to see IDOLATORS get slapped down. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The title to that article is worded to promote maximum outrage and confusion.
It reads like the court prevented someone from putting a cross up on private land. Instead, courts ruled against PRIVATIZING land so that a cross could be put on it. It makes me wonder if it was intentional. This sounds like something Limpballs will be screaming about soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, the headline writer might be a Limbaugh fan.
...Or maybe he's just obnoxious and trying to piss people of by misleading them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Does that mean that Florida will now have to remove this
bit of idol worship???



I'm sure the fish don't care one way or another... and someday a hurricane is going to topple it and drag it all over the coral reef (if there still is a coral reef there).

Course, it's located inside a state park... so maybe that's different.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. We have a huge cross in our city park. When we were kids,
it used to freak us out & we didn't want to go near it because we all thought someone was buried under there.... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Mojave National Preserve ain't got nothin on Groom, Tx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I have seen a couple like that in my travels through Tennessee. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, well, Groom's is bigger!
But not THE biggest. Teh Wikipedia says there's one in Illinois that is eight feet taller than Groom's 190 ft cross. Of course, the one in Valle de los Caidos, Spain puts them all to shame. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC