Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators Hear Clashing Views on Factory Farm Waste Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 02:59 PM
Original message
Senators Hear Clashing Views on Factory Farm Waste Rules
It's pretty clear that Sen Lincoln and Rep Peterson are a lot more concerned w/ the corporate butter on their bread than the people they represent.That's becoming an epidemic in the Democratic Party.

--###--

original-congressionalquarterly

Senators Hear Clashing Views on Factory Farm Waste Rules

By William Scally

The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Thursday heard sharply diverging views on whether the superfund environmental cleanup law should be applied to huge animal feeding operations that pose a threat to water and air quality.

So-called concentrated animal feeding operations, sometimes called factory farms, have proliferated in recent years, now totaling about 19,000 across the country.

A CAFO may contain thousands of hogs or hundreds of thousands of chickens. Their waste, often spread on the land, can flow into streams and lakes, causing growth of harmful algae and contamination by bacteria, pesticides and hormones, posing serious threats to health.

The problem has led to calls by environmental and conservation groups for application of the superfund law under which “the polluter pays” for cleanup — and a suit by Oklahoma Attorney General W.A. Drew Edmondson that uses the law to seek cleanup costs from poultry companies.

But bills by Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and House Agriculture Chairman Collin C. Peterson, D-Minn., would amend the superfund law — the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act — to exclude manure from the definition of a “hazardous substance.”

~snip~
.
.
.
complete article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is an issue about which we should be calling our congresscritters
Obama's office just took my message. Durbin's office gave me the impression he is supporting cutting the industrial factory farms from the industrial waste legislation. Oh well, at least they logged in my nay vote call.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC