Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force Orders Stand Down For US on Sept 14

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:54 PM
Original message
Air Force Orders Stand Down For US on Sept 14
ACC orders command-wide stand-down on Sept. 14

By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Sep 8, 2007 8:31:15 EDT

On Sept. 14, flight lines will be very quiet at Air Combat Command bases.

The entire command — about 100,000 active-duty airmen — is standing down training flights and many other operations as part of a command-wide safety day.

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety stand-down in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane. It was not until the B-52H was parked at Barksdale that ground crews discovered the cruise missiles were carrying real warheads.

Command spokesman Maj. Tom Crosson said wing commanders would determine how their units review operations and safety procedures and checklists.

Just how serious Keys takes the lapse of regulations at Minot is reflected in the fact that the safety stand-down is the first command-wide safety day in recent memory. In the past, the command has singled out specific types of aircraft for safety days and in 1997 the Department of Defense held a department-wide safety review day.

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/09/airforce_aircombatcommand_standdown_070807/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fascinating. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. So What Happens With NORAD That Day ???
Does this effect every single military plane in the U.S.?

How widespread is this? What are the implications?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Any AF DU'ers out there who can answer these questions?
I'd like to know as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. See this thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Maybe they don't know what Missiles they have on their
planes ??? if thats the case this is a MAJOR screwup

or our Military has security problems with their Nukes
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. They ought to remove all the religious nut cases while they're at it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's the first thing I thought of, too. Is 9/11 going to be 9/14 now?
God forbid we stop any suicide planes from invading restricted air space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. It would be good timing to stop the 9/15 protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. I'm sure Canada will still have military planes
flying that day. NORAD still operates its space surveillance and missle warning systems from there as well.

I'm sure they'll be sitting around drinking coffee talking about the Michigan game...status quo. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. NORAD is not Air Combat Command
The Major Commands of the Air Force are:

Air Combat Command (the 1992 union of Strategic Air Command and Tactical Air Command)
Air Education and Training Command
Air Force Materiel Command
Air Force Reserve Command
Air Force Space Command
Air Force Special Operations Command
Air Mobility Command (the reorganized Military Airlift Command)
Pacific Air Forces
US Air Forces in Europe

The US part of NORAD (it's a US-Canadian joint command) is a separate entity. They will continue with routine operations.

Okay, I'm looking at this subordination chart. PACAF and USAFE are outside the continental United States. No one else on that list is going to have a hell of a lot of armed airplanes.

Now, having said that, if the duty officer at Burpelson Air Force Base picks up the phone and General Turgidson at the other end tells him, "Osama bin Laden just crossed the Mexican border in a King Air stuffed full of Semtex, send someone out there to light his ass up," someone will go out there to light his ass up. It's not like they're taking the airplanes apart or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. this has caused some major oopsies
and makes one wonder who is in CHARGE of the Military???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Well we know who is technically "commander-in-chief"
The real screw-up was when this idiot was appointed. And then when large numbers of voters displayed their own cluelessness by re-affirming him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not comfortable with this.
Doesn't smell right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Six. Broken. Arrows.
Six.

That's insane.

Makes MIHOP seem less and less likely though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wouldn't announcing this kinda leave an opening for terrorists? -- Just saying . .. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. uh, yeah.... I think it would.
Kinda odd. Kinda REALLY ODD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. That was my first thought. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. I can't understand why this isn't classified as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. When this first broke
It was said that the missiles were not armed and could not explode. At the time my reply was that these assholes have never heard of Murphy's Law or SNAFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. No surprise there
I knew that his would happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. The page has now gone AWOL....
Interesting. Didn't that happen with the initial report of the nuclear "incident" as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. Try this link:
ACC orders command-wide stand-down on Sept. 14


By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Sep 8, 2007 8:31:15 EDT


On Sept. 14, flight lines will be very quiet at Air Combat Command bases.

The entire command — about 100,000 active-duty airmen — is standing down training flights and many other operations as part of a command-wide safety day.

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety stand-down in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane. It was not until the B-52H was parked at Barksdale that ground crews discovered the cruise missiles were carrying real warheads.

Command spokesman Maj. Tom Crosson said wing commanders would determine how their units review operations and safety procedures and checklists.

Just how serious Keys takes the lapse of regulations at Minot is reflected in the fact that the safety stand-down is the first command-wide safety day in recent memory. In the past, the command has singled out specific types of aircraft for safety days and in 1997 the Department of Defense held a department-wide safety review day.



Via Google: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct=us/0-0&fp=46e3c26203d21c29&ei=jPXjRuuZDJuYafvPkIoJ&url=http%3A//www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/09/airforce_aircombatcommand_standdown_070807/&cid=1120386395



Here is the blurb from the Google search page:

ACC orders command-wide stand-down on Sept. 14

AirForceTimes.com, VA - Sep 7, 2007


Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety stand-down in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, ND, in which six cruise missiles ...

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=ACC+orders+command-wide+stand-down+on+Sept.+14&btnG=Search+News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
20. Safety stand downs although infrequent....
...do occur. After a particularly heinous accident involving a rogue pilot and a B-52, the USAF stood down for a 24-hour period.

Here's the video that was taken of the accident, which occurred during a practice sortie for an airshow:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=E21byPXR1ek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I thought links to that site were not allowed on DU?
Isn't that the site DUers can only refer to as the site that cannot be named?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Uh oh, I didn't know that. Should I delete it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. If I recall correctly, there was a stand-down
on 11/22/63 of the military detail which (almost) always protects the President. There was also an exercise on 9/11/01 as well, such that Officers in Charge were asking, "Is this Real?"

."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. German suspects had deadline to act by Sept 15th as recorded in bugged telephone call.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070908/wl_nm/germany_security_dc_1

By Erik Kirschbaum
Sat Sep 8, 12:30 PM ET



BERLIN (Reuters) - Three suspected Islamist militants who were planning to attack American targets in Germany had orders to act by September 15 and knew police were hot on their trail before their arrest, a magazine said on Saturday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. If they weren't the only cell with those orders.... ........ ............
....and suddenly our government is ordering a full "stand down" of our air defenses.........................

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. there were a lot more that didn't get caught. They are still
in the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
25. This is pretty significant:
From www.acc.af.mil:

Aircraft:

• A-10/OA-10 Thunderbolt II
• B-2 Spirit
• B-1B Lancer
• B-52 Stratofortress
• E-3 Sentry (AWACS)
• E-4B NAOC
• E-8C Joint Stars
• EC-130H Compass Call
• F-117A Nighthawk
• F-15 Eagle
• F-15E Strike Eagle
• F-16 Fighting Falcon
• F-22A Raptor
• HC-130P/N
• HH-60G Pave Hawk
• MQ-1 Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
• MQ-9 Reaper Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
• OC-135B Open Skies
• RC-135V/W Rivet Joint
• RC-135U Combat Sent
• U-2S/TU-2S
• WC-135W Constant Phoenix

Weapons:

• AGM-130 Missile
• AGM-65 Maverick
• AGM-86B/C Missiles
• AGM-88 HARM
• AIM-120 AMRAAM
• AIM-7 Sparrow
• AIM-9 Sidewinder
• GBU-15
• Joint Direct Attack Munitions GBU 31/32
• GBU-39B, SMALL DIAMETER BOMB WEAPON SYSTEM


This is no small deal at all, although who knows what the result will be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Gee ..... wouldn't ya think like anytime around Sept 11th .....
ummmmm our military would be on high alert ....... like ummm given this ogga booga booga date Sept 11th ........ ummmmmm so the powers that be decide to do a major freaking stand down on the 14th .... Okay I feel much safer .... NOT. :scared:

:wtf: are they thinking? Or planning? All I can say is :wtf:

Here's a response to the announcement on another link ....

FMNN Feedbacker A Magnus has questions:

Ummm, hello? Are you people freaking out of your minds? Why would you announce to the whole world that your air defenses will be down on a specific date? Isn't that like inviting terrorists or any other would-be super power by saying "Come on down - it's not guarded!" -A Magnus, regular FMNN Feedbacker (Revised)

http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=48646
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Not a very good time to stand down at all, strange?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BornagainDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. The rot of Bushie corruptions is eating away at the fabric of the Dept. of Defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. I seem to remember a stand down on 911 any links???? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
37. BUMP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
38. The Nukes have already
been carried to the staging area, so a stand down means nothig. Is Bu$hCo plaaning a NUKE drop on Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
39. I tried the link
only to get this message: That page has gone AWOL!

404 Error: File not found. Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Better link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC