Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. threatens Turkey over energy support to Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eyeontheprize Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:32 PM
Original message
U.S. threatens Turkey over energy support to Iran
Source: World Tribune

WASHINGTON — The United States has suggested that Turkey could come under sanctions for its energy cooperation with Iran.

The State Department has criticized Turkey for its agreement for natural gas cooperation with Teheran. A senior official pointed out that Congress was working on legislation that would sanction Ankara or others that help develop Iran's energy sector.

"The U.S. government's policy is that countries should not be stimulating their companies to be involved in oil and gas investment in Iran," Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns said.


Read more: http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2007/ss_turkey_09_07.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Bush going to go to war against NATO?
Turkey is a member of NATO, if she is attacked she is entitled to support from nATO--even against an aggressor Amerika.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. US threatens France for shipping Wine to Iran.
We can't have drunks with their finger on the nucular button.
Oh wait........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is so stupid...
So we don't like the Iranians with their nuclear energy thing. So what do we do? Apply sanctions to a country that would help them with other forms of energy?

If there is any sense in this, please let me know what it is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. How'd you like to be
in a country threatened by that little hitleresque toad?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You Are Here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I just thought of that the second
before I read your post..I knew that's what you were going to say..

It's Tragic and I feel like fighting it for all I'm worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Ask not if those missing nukes are intended for Iran.
They're intended for me and thee... :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Okay. I'm in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Another thing
I know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thank you
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's exactly what we should do, piss off and threaten every country in the region.
Then start a war with Iran. Chimpy sure is trying to make a U.S. presence in the Middle East a permanent thing. What a douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hmmm, the US threatens any country that helps Iran with their energy demands
If those Iranians were smart, they'd build some type of energy source that wasn't dependent on imports from other countries. Oh, they could burn their oil, but then what would they sell for exports? Hmmm, now what could Iran build that would supply enough energy to power cities and doesn't require imported fuel from other countries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. These criminal fuckwits are just flailing around pissing off and threatening
everybody now.

The desperation is really starting to smell pretty bad. Especially since the nukes are still sitting in Louisiana.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. that last line is a hoot!

- Feature
Posted : Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:11:04 GMT
Ankara - On Iraq's northern border, Turkey and Iran have a common enemy in their sights. The armies of both countries are engaged in conflict with around 7,000 Kurdish militants who, tolerated by the government of Iraq's autonomous Kurdish region, are entrenched in the mountainous frontier region.

The militants belong to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), outlawed in Turkey, and the Party for Freedom and Life in Kurdistan (PJAK) from Iran.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iranian artillery fire targeting suspected PJAK positions in the provinces of Sulaymanyah and Arbil is heard almost on a daily basis. Yet on the political front, the conflict is little heard of. Few seem to be troubled by this border war, save for the residents of Kurdish villages who have been forced to flee their homes.
In contrast to the ongoing car bombing campaign targeting markets, bridges and barracks in the Iraqi capital, the violence in the north seems to be little more than a sideshow to the main conflict for the politicians in the capital.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Even in Washington, where any interference by Iran in Iraqi affairs normally results in accusations and warnings from the Bush administration, any opposition to the Iranian attacks on the border region remains firmly behind closed doors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the Turkish army has massed 10,000 troops along the Iraqi frontier and readied for a major offensive, it has so far engaged only in minor missions. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan appears committed to a policy of restraint.

Copyright, respective author or news agency


http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/101088.html



http://priceofoil.org/2007/02/01/the-battle-for-oil-rich-kirkuk
The Battle for Oil-Rich Kirkuk
Published by Andy Rowell February 1st, 2007 in Oil, War, Iraq Tags: Iraq, Oil, War.

Interesting piece in today’s LA Times about the struggle for Kirkuk, the oil-rich town in northern Iraq. American officials, regional leaders and residents are increasingly worried that the town could develop into a third front in the country’s civil war.

All the different ethnic groups in the region - the Kurds, Arabs and Turkmens are all vying for control of this city and the region. At stake are land, water and of course, some of Iraq’s richest oil reserves.Everyone appears to be preparing for war, even though no one says they want it. “They are right when they call it a time bomb”, argues Sheik Abdul Rahman Obeidi, a prominent Sunni Arab leader in Kirkuk. “We will not leave, and we will not let anyone take Kirkuk. We are ready to fight. We hope we won’t have to, but we’re ready.”

Kurdish leaders, in turn, warn that they will take the city by law or by force. “People don’t have any more patience,” said Kurdish Councilman Rebwar Faiq Talabani, sitting in Kirkuk’s heavily fortified provincial council building. “They are telling the government, ‘If you can’t get our rights back, we’ll do it by ourselves.’ “

Neighboring countries, especially Turkey and Iran, fear that if the Kurds do gain control of Kirkuk, Iraq’s semiautonomous Kurdish region would have the confidence and economic power based on oil to move toward independence. Against this backdrop of ethnic, political and regional tensions, Iraq’s new constitution mandates that a referendum on control of Kirkuk be held by the end of this year. If the vote goes ahead as scheduled, most analysts expect the Kurds to win.

If that happens the whole region could be destabalised, as Turkey for one, would not support it…
http://priceofoil.org/2007/02/01/the-battle-for-oil-ric... /

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Probably just as well
they're not part of the EEC yet - I don't think he'd try they that stunt if they were so.

Apart from that Turkey controls the terminal for the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil pipeline. That's the one which runs from the democraticly elected <ha fucking ha - they threw out the election monitors> government of Azerbaijan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fit To Print? (McGrath in New Yorker re: "World Tribune" as Moony organ)
This Just In Dept.
Fit To Print?
by Ben McGrath September 8, 2003

Aficionados of the Drudge Report may have noticed several striking headlines recently linking to stories from the World Tribune, an enterprise with a title as grand and ambitious as it is unfamiliar. One such story last week began, “U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction have finally been located.” The apparent scoop—of stop-the-presses significance—was unsigned, and billed as a “special to World Tribune.com.” The Times, the Journal, and the Washington Post, meanwhile, not only got beat but failed even to acknowledge the news in the days that followed. What gives?

Not everyone ignored it: Rush Limbaugh, for instance. “There’s a piece in the World Tribune today—one of the papers in the United Kingdom—exactly as theorized on this program early on,” he said on his radio show. “It’s unconfirmed, but it’s a story that many of the weapons of mass destruction are at present buried in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon.” Fox News, catering to a similar demographic, enlisted a military analyst that evening to discuss potential ramifications—military intervention in Lebanon?—on “The O’Reilly Factor.” According to the story, the weapons were probably delivered to the Bekaa Valley, a Hezbollah stronghold, in a caravan of tractor-trailers that was spotted leaving Iraq in January, two months before the war began, as part of a multimillion- dollar storage deal between Saddam Hussein and the Syrian government.

In fact, the World Tribune is not published in the United Kingdom, nor is it, to be precise, a newspaper. It is a Web site produced, more or less as a hobby, in Falls Church, Virginia, and is dedicated to the notion, as its mission statement explains, that “there is a market for news of the world and not just news of the weird.” (Nonetheless, the site includes a prominent feature, Cosmic Tribune, with an extraterrestrial focus, and it links to a Mafia journal called Gang Land News.) Its editor and publisher, Robert Morton, is an assistant managing editor at the Washington Times and a former “corporate editor” for News World Communications, the Times’ owner and the publishing arm of the Unification Church, led by the Reverend Sun Myung Moon. (Morton and his wife, Choon Boon, are themselves followers of the Reverend Moon.) Among the World Tribune’s other recent half-ignored scoops are that Al Qaeda claimed responsibility for last month’s blackout and that a North Korean defector stressed, during a meeting in July with White House officials, the need for a preëmptive military strike against Kim Jong Il ...

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2003/09/08/030908ta_talk_mcgrath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. Why did this get moved into GD?
I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC