|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 07:09 PM Original message |
NY Times: "Blocking Mexican Trucks." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. wow. "Keeping Mexican trucks out only keeps transport costs higher, harming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ok I will agree with them but... there are caveats here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. NAFTA is a flawed trade agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pampango (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. NAFTA is indeed a flawed agreement and should be either renegotiated or abrogated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Many third world countries have violated NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. This could have been written by an Indian college student as a first semester econ exam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Just one correction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Your snarkiness does not enhance your arguments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I am sorry, no snarkiness meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-12-07 07:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I'm not your friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC