Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Remarkable "Recusal" of US attorney Leura Canary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:26 PM
Original message
The Remarkable "Recusal" of US attorney Leura Canary

If you want to get up to speed on the Ala Gov. Siegelman/US attorney scandal, this would be a good place to start....

The Remarkable “Recusal” of Leura Canary

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/09/hbc-90001209

By: Scott Horton, Harpers Magazine
September 14, 2007

Alabama media continue to report uncritically just about any statement that emanates from the office of Leura Canary, the U.S. Attorney in Montgomery, who is currently in the crosshairs of the Siegelman investigation. One of the most often repeated, and still unexamined, contentions to emanate from her office is the claim that Leura Canary recused herself from the prosecution of Governor Don Siegelman, and that the case was handled from that point forward by the head of her criminal department, Louis V. Franklin. As we will shortly see in an examination of that question forthcoming in a major legal periodical, Franklin’s claim that he ran the case collapses completely under close inspection. He did handle the trial, which is important, but the key aspects of tactical and case management decision-making were retained by political appointees in Washington—to an extent that was quite extraordinary. Yet it seems that no reporter in Alabama ever worked up the gumption to ask any questions or do any research about it; they all just reported what Louis Franklin said, and they didn’t put any follow up questions to him, either.

But one of the oddest claims has consistently been the simple suggestion that Leura Canary ‘recused’ herself from the case. When I first heard this, I put down on my check list: collect Canary recusal papers from court docket. My researcher went off looking for them, and reported back: there are no Canary recusal papers. How could that be? I sent him back again. Same result. I started asking counsel and clerks at the court. Well, it seems, no one else had ever seen the recusal papers. So that leaves it open in my mind: did Leura Canary actually recuse herself? I’m skeptical of that claim. Moreover, the matter’s extremely important since Mrs. Canary went to great lengths to create a public appearance that she had withdrawn. But there’s a lot to suggest that in fact she never relinquished complete control over the case; that her ‘recusal’ is a sham. Let’s take a deeper look, shall we?

In mid-2001, Leura Canary commenced an investigation into “certain state employees” on corruption allegations. It soon became apparent that the principal target of this investigation was Governor Siegelman. The investigation had been initiated at the request of William Pryor, then Attorney General of Alabama. Various representatives of Mrs. Canary’s office have given conflicting false explanations of the source of the complaint initiating the investigation, by the way. Usually they attribute it to a newspaper reporter from Mobile, in an effort to obscure the actual and highly partisan political source. This is important because, as we will see, William Pryor and Leura Canary share a common partner. And his name is William Canary.

-snip-

Mr. Canary served as chief of staff for the Republican National Committee, as chief of staff to the 2000 G.O.P. Convention chairman and former Bush chief of staff, Andy Card, and as National Field Director for the Bush-Quayle campaign in 1992. I am told by senior Republican figures that Canary secured these various roles largely on the strength of his close personal friendship with Karl Rove and with Rove’s express endorsement. In 1994, Mr. Canary and his friend and mentor Karl Rove put together a grand strategy to turnaround the court system in Alabama, putting the G.O.P.’s handpicked candidates in control of key Alabama appellate court races. This process was chronicled by Joshua Green in a major article on Rove’s remaking of the judicial politics of Alabama published in The Atlantic. In a 1995 article, Time Magazine’s Michael Kramer called Bill Canary a “legend in Republican circles” and in the same article, former RNC Chairman Rich Bond described Bill Canary as an “expert political paratrooper” and “someone you dropped into a state where something needed fixing and it got fixed.” Mr. Canary was the architect of a special relationship between the Alabama G.O.P. and the Business Council of Alabama that proved the finance lifeline for many Alabama G.O.P. election campaigns. He was widely described as the G.O.P.’s Alabama “kingpin.”

--MUCH more on the link, here-

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/09/hbc-90001209


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I'm a great reader; but, I don't know about anyone else, but could we have a "tired corner" for . .
DU'ers who just can't read any more at the moment --

I need a condensed version of this ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I am with you there.
If the article is newsworthy enough to post, a synopsis or highlights would be much appreciated. (1 tired pair 'o eyes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Ok, in a nutshell...

The US attorney is married to a man who is connected at the hip to the RNC and Karl Rove, so much so that the attorney had to recuse herself from the Siegelman case because everyone could see that this was nothing but a political hit job (the first judge threw the case out).

Actually she just 'says' she recused herself.. on a closer look there is no evidence she did, and they refuse to produce even the routine paperwork that would prove it.

Even worse, the major newspapers in the state have been reporting that she recused herself, but it has been revealed by Scott Horton that there is no evidence of it, so the newspapers have just been stenographers for the corrupt prosecutors. The biased coverage has been unbelievable.

There is a lot more to it, but thats this part in a nutshell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-16-07 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. OK -- thanks -- trying to follow . . ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Closer inspection seems to demolish so many Republican claims
You'd think some enterprising journalist (do we have them anymore?), hungry for a Pulitzer, would spend some time doing closer inspection of Republican claims. The upside for exposing graft, corruption and worse seems nearly limitless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Scott Horton has done it in Spades.
http://www.harpers.org/subjects/DonSiegelman/SubjectOf/BlogEntry

and there are more after these in chronology. Scroll to the bottom of this page for later posts:

http://www.harpers.org/subjects/ScottHorton/WriterOf/BlogEntry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. what sort of national TV coverage has this gotten? I've never seen a thing about this.
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 11:17 PM by Gabi Hayes
I haven't been watching much lately, but, still.....

NOBODY I've ever asked about this has ever heard of it, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I should post more about it...

The more I have looked into this case.. the more shocking it gets.

The blatant hackery is just amazing.. and the judge was as bad, or worse, a hack than the prosecutors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I see you found Scott Horton. He has a real series on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Ok, you beat me to it


I was looking for that link to post it here..

Thanks for the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. But still have not read it all. There sure is a lot of info there.
The Bush Scandals are too extensive for mere mortals to comprehend. :rofl: We need "special" prosecutors by the dozens!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Parallel discussion here = Jill Simpson to Capitol Hill Today
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 11:59 PM by L. Coyote
Jill Simpson to Capitol Hill Today (AL Gov Siegelman DOJ prosecutors case)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1808866
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Do you happen to know what John Conyers's response has been
in light of the refusal of Canary to produce the requested documents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC