Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blackwater Well-Positioned to Stymie Official Inquiries, Regulation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:17 PM
Original message
Blackwater Well-Positioned to Stymie Official Inquiries, Regulation
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004232.php

Blackwater Well-Positioned to Stymie Official Inquiries, Regulation
By Spencer Ackerman - September 19, 2007, 12:10PM


Blackwater doesn't just operate in a legal black hole in Iraq. The private-security firm has grown expert in protecting itself from oversight and regulation in Washington as well.

Over at POGO, Nick Schwellenbach connects Blackwater to House oversight committee chairman Henry Waxman's investigation of Howard Krongard, the State Department inspector general whom Waxman alleges stifled numerous corruption probes in Iraq and Afghanistan. One of those probes involved an alleged Blackwater scheme to funnel weapons into Iraq, and, Schwellenbach notes, it wouldn't be so difficult for Blackwater to know how to get around an IG probe. Its parent company, the Prince Group, recently hired the Pentagon's ex-IG, Joseph Schmitz.

Indeed, all throughout Blackwater are ways to get around government oversight: Cofer Black, the company's vice chairman, used to work at the CIA with A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, formerly CIA's executive director. And, yes, you read that last name correctly: Krongard of CIA is the brother of the current State Department IG. Think Schmitz or Black knew which numbers to call in the event of a State inquiry into the company?

That's not all.

Roll Call reports (sub. req.) that Blackwater and its private-security colleagues are investing heavily in lobbyists to prevent Congress from passing legislation regulating their war-zone activities.

more...

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004232.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then Congress should threaten to revoke its charter or right to do
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 03:20 PM by no_hypocrisy
business for the United States government in this country and/or abroad.

And delay paying them for their alleged services for like twenty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd love to see that, but somehow I doubt we'll see any such thing.
They are so connected to this admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ain't it the truth. You'd need one hell of a surgeon to remove the congressional
nose from the corporate butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoRonin Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. The only thing that will kill something like Blackwater . . .
Lack of funding.
Blackwater is not like auto industry, the agriculture industry or any other industry that actually makes things that consumers buy.
They are entirely dependent on fat government contracts. Not only does that give them the money to carry out their mercenary missions, but also provides for their teams of lobbyists, etc. (I wouldn't put it beyond Blackwater to outright bribe officials as well).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. True
But the Mahdi Army might give it a go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. well they are presently positioned inside the green zone
and are not going anywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing to see here -- back to Taser boy and OJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC