Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman-Kyl Amendment Seeks To Escalate Possibility Of Military Action Against Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:41 PM
Original message
Lieberman-Kyl Amendment Seeks To Escalate Possibility Of Military Action Against Iran
Edited on Tue Sep-25-07 12:43 PM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/25/kyl-iran-fox/

Lieberman-Kyl Amendment Seeks To Escalate Possibility Of Military Action Against Iran

Today, the Senate is expected to vote on an “extremely threatening” amendment to the Defense Authorization Bill introduced by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ). The “sense of the Senate” amendment could “lead to a tit-for-tat escalation resulting in military confrontation between the US and Iran.”

The legislation accuses Iran of fighting “a proxy war against the Iraqi state and coalition forces in Iraq” and threatens to “combat, contain and ” Iran. The right wing has quickly latched onto the amendment, claiming it “unflinchingly…calls on America to win” against Iran.

Appearing on Fox News today, Kyl attempted to downplay the legislation’s implications, claiming “this is not intended to be an authorization of military force against Iran.”

Watch it at link~

In reality, the amendment is a clear call for military action against alleged Iranian agents inside Iraq. From the text of the legislation:

(3) that it should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain, and (stop) the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies;

(4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy described in paragraph (3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies.

As Jonathan Schwarz noted, the amendment is a “Sense of the Senate” resolution, “which means it has no legal force, but as the Congressional Research Service will tell you, ‘foreign governments pay close attention to as evidence of shifts in U.S. foreign policy priorities.’”

Analysts are warning that “the growing US focus on confronting Iran in a proxy war inside Iraq risks triggering a direct conflict in the next few months.” Kyl said his legislation would “pass rather handily.”

UPDATE: TPMtv today looks at how the Lieberman-Kyl amendment is similar to the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act, which officially put the U.S. on record as supporting regime change in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Guess will see who votes for war with Iran won't we
Just hope the Senators know their signature on a Preemptive strike against a country will be a signature like when Japan attacked Pearl harbor or Hitler went into Belgium
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. "The fanfare is the light, the execution is in the dark . . . "
Meanwhile, DU whistles past the graveyard with the never ending gnashing of teeth over some dipshit who spoke at a university recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. My bet is that it will pass
and War with Iran is inevitable.

I didn't think that until yesterday. The fact that so many people here on DU are willing to buy Bush's tripe about Iran's "leader" tells me that there will be little or no pushback about this.

A sad day, to know that I belong to the thinest of thin slivers of America- the ones who call for sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Democratic Party had better know that they are on notice over this
lunacy. If the Democratic controlled Senate allows this amendment to go forward and then passes it, I am done with them. I don't think that I will be the only one. They allowed the domestic surveillance bill to come up and passed it, they gave Bush yet another blank-check on Iraq, they allowed and passed a slap-MoveOn-in-the-face bill and now this. I would like an American political party that actually represented the American people...but that may be too much to ask for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This might have been snuck in, but they can't claim they're not aware
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If they had someone read what goes in, that wouldn't be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC