Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "happiness poll " ,,why women are not as happy as they "should" be.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:28 PM
Original message
The "happiness poll " ,,why women are not as happy as they "should" be.
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 03:39 PM by SoCalDem
Apparently this poll says that women in 1970 were happier, and newsies today are flabbergasted about the fact that women have come so far, and are not happy..

I think there are many reasons for this

in 1970, if a woman worked outside the house, it was most likely an optional,very part time job and she knew she could quit it any time she needed to or wanted to.

Women back then (married, not sole support) had the run of the house, kids, neighborhood with little or no "interference" from their husbands.. They had TIME to get things done

(I know from personal experience that MY friends and I would often spend the day with the kids, or without them ..having put them in babysitting co-op care.. lunching, playing bridge, shopping, & goofing..and then , if our husbands were not out of town, we would get very "serious" about 3PM, and race back home to make dinner, tidy up..etc..)

Weekends were truly family fun time, since there was not a weeks-worth of undone chores to be done.

Men were not expected to do "housework", and most didn't, but the women I knew never held it against them.

As times changed, women went into the workforce in large numbers, but those household things remained..and then there was the additional guilt about the kids..

Pressuring recalcitrant guys into suddenly shouldering more housework duties has never been all that effective for many families ,and only added another "child" for the women to ride herd on..

Women these days have to please many more people than ever.. They have work worries, home worries, kid worries, childcare worries, and even financial worries (make more spend more).

As women have gained more freedom, they have also discovered that freedom has many strings attached.. As women earned more, their income became more and more vital to the family, and the things bought with payments required more and more income.


As houses got bigger and more expensive, the luxury of staying home evaporated...

Job security has gone the way of the Dodo bird, so no one feels secure, and women with jobs often find themselves supporting the family when dad gets downsized or laid off.

The pressures of modern living hit hard, but I think women have always been the designated worriers in families, so maybe they feel the pressure more intensely.

There are also more women in the workforce doing crappy jobs.. It's hard to be "happy" to know that your baby will be with strangers for several hours, and your older kids will be on-their-own, doing god knows what for several hours, while you go to walmart or k-mart or to a dreary office somewhere... and when you get home you will still have laundry to do, meals to prepare & other household stuff to tend to.

There are surely women with challenging careers, who have enough resources to "do it all", but I'm betting that most women do NOT love their jobs, and wish there were a way out of the trap they find themselves in..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not happier because I still don't have help with housework. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. me either... I'm lucky I get the trash taken out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. We who came of age in the 60s and 70s found out that having it all
generally meant DOING it all.

That realization didn't hit home until the late 70s when going to work outside the home was no longer an option but a necessity and we faced the reality that husbands tend to do less, not more, as time goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. lol, doing it all, you got that right
Although I went on strike after my last one left home and my husband now does the cooking, laundry and kitchen cleaning. I still have to do the weekly stuff, but at least the daily grind is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Count me in... Had I known.. I wouldn't have bothered with my worthless
degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did you work in your field of study?
I have many friend who got their degrees, and ended up not even working in that field..some loved work,..others hated it and quit..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. No, I don't. I have for a little bit.. it was not safe for my health. In general,
a B.S. is just that..bull shit.

And the one thing I would love to be able to do is stop and be with my children showing them the beginnings of life.. not some stranger who has too many snot-nosed kids running around who has no patience for them...

I wish I could be paid to be a house mother. Bet there would be a better return on the dollar for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
softwarevotingtrail Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great post - interesting point from the survey
One interesting point from the survey is that men like spending time with their parents, whereas women rank it more like a chore. That's because being together with parents for a guy most likely means hanging out with dad drinking a beer and watching the game, while for women it tends to be about taking care of health and housing issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Playing golf with Dad vs helping Mom navigate Medicare papers
no contest..guys win..

Women tody often end up caring for inlaws and their own parents..and the kids of their kids..all while still working that outside job.. who's got TIME to be "happy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let you in on a secret; MANY men feel the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I wondered about that...
And I also wonder if perhaps the prospects were looking pretty good for women back then, we were women, we were roaring, and we were doing what we wanted to do for once. We had a lot to look forward to. What do we have to look forward to now? That goes for men and women.

PS - my last three pooch procurements came via rescue groups, and I'll never have another pet otherwise! Best dogs ever. My dear departed Cooper looked much like your avitar... Dobie Shepherd... smartest, most loving damn dog you ever wanted to know. If he'd had thumbs, he would have been dangerous! I had to put him down three years ago, and I'm still not over it. But Jack and Sedwick are sweet too:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Cutie pie babies you got there.. We are rescuers too..
they make the best pets.. I swear they KNOW you saved them.. I can see it in their eyes when they look at me :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Rescue rocks!
My wife and I have done a number of home checks for rescue orgs over the past several years and have always been glad to find good homes for good dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
60. I'm happy to say
All the rescue groups I've dealt with have been very thorough in the adoption process, even calling my vet to get the scoop on how I care for my animals.

When we had to put Cooper down, my daughter was inconsolable for days. Finally, I said, let's go rescue a puppy. At first it was, "Oh Mom! I can't think about it." I dropped it, and a day later, it was, "Mom, let's go see who needs rescued." Planting that seed helped us both move past the grief of losing Cooper. And our sweet, spoiled pooches show us every day that rescuing is good for them, and good for us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Yep...
Along with the home check, a vet's recommendation is a great asset. We were actually asked once stop in Eastern WA to check a home in Moses Lake and were very happy to find a lesbian couple with a horse ranch where one partner herself was a vet. That home got a great recommendation and it made both of us happy we were the ones to do the check, since who knows what someone else might have made of it.

I know that rescue isn't rife with freeper types, but it would only take one nitwit to decide that wasn't the "proper environment" for a dog. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Looks like a great pair of BFF.
Thank you for adopting two homeless pets, I know they thank you every day of their lives.

I hope there is a return to sanity and reason sometime in the future, for everyone's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDenton Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. I agree
I think this country has been on a downward spiral since the mid 70's. We've had social advancements and improvements in thigs like the civil rights movement, but economicly most Americans seem to be treading water and getting tired, or just drifting back. Alot of those propblems the OP mentions are due to increased economic burdens being placed on families in general. It would be great if we could step back to a time when you didn't have to have two incomes to survive.

My uncle told me back in the early 90's that my generation was going to be really disappointed in life in not really making "the American dream" because we were not going to have as high standard of living as his. I laughted it off at the time but now I see he was right. He could see the writting on the wall. I guess it's because he had already seen so many changes in his own life happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why are the newsies flabergasted....
when every other segment they do is meant to dump guilt on Moms. Your a bad Mom if you don't schedule your kid out the wa zoo with 'enriching' activities, whip up a made from scratch gourmet dinner that meets your kids nutritional needs, and slink around in the bedroom for an hour or so of vigorous sex. Oh and this is after dressing to the nines for work, multitasking like the perfect employee.

Oh, and that after work drink to unwind and keep you from killing the kids. I won't even get into you kid smart mouthing you....God help you if the fertility police catch you.:mad:

Women are held to an artificially high mommy standard. No wonder women are unhappy. My hubby is from another country so I don't get the macho bull shit that most of my American friends get. He may not do it like I would but he does what I ask and doesn't give me grief when I ask.

I am very happy that daughter is almost grown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I chose a good husband too.. he never complains about anything
and does more than his "share".. always has :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. A bit of self promotion here, but it is EXACTLY what you just said...a rhyme for women
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 04:17 PM by angstlessk
Time Spent

Who lends time I ask you please
to care for what a woman must.
Her boss, child, friends she must appease
then give into her husband's lust.

First to ready each one for the day
then her own self she must gather
off to work for little pay
though there's much she'd do rather.

Her boss expects her time be spent
on work all of the day.
So o're te paperwork she is bent
as time just slips away.

Her friend she meets and spends the time
just whilling lunch away.
Sometimes she wonders where is mine
when will this spending pay?

Home again as nourisher
the diner she's begun
so little time spent just for her
she feels she'll come undone.

She now readies each for the night
and is glad the day's almost over.
Into bed she tucks each child tight
then turns into the rapacious lover.

If time were money would she spend
each second as if gold.
Or would she, as with time, lend
for a return of mearely old?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
54. I don't get it either...How can they be shocked? They're partially responsible.
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 09:30 AM by youthere
THIS is what society puts on women today:


If you take time for yourself, you're selfish. If you don't you must have low self-esteem.
If you put your husband first, you're a bad mom. If you put your kids first you're a bad wife. And if you choose a husband and no kids, you are selfish, if you choose kids and no husband you are a whore, if you choose no husband or kids you are not a "real woman".
If you put your job first, you're neglecting your family. If you put your family first, you're neglecting your job.
If you work outside the home, you are too ambitious, If you don't, you have no ambition.
If your house is not surgically clean, then you must be lazy, if it is spotlessly clean then you are anal-retentive.
If you stand up for yourself you are a bitch. If you don't you are a doormat.

How do we find the balance? And in the meantime, society expects me to do the shopping and the cleaning and the cooking and the kids and my job in heels, with my hair and makeup perfect at all times, wearing a designer outfit (in a size 5 of course) with a big fucking smile plastered on my face?
Then to top it off, I'm not even allowed the luxury of cramps once a month because some advertising asshole decided I should be having "happy periods". Am I happy? Hell no..and my husband helps with the housework. But I never will be until I say ENOUGH!
We stop letting "society" dictate what we should be and do, we need to stand up for ourselves and be strong enough to just be who we are and be content with that. That's when I'm my happiest...when I can be strong enough to just not care what my hair or my house looks like. When my kids are playing in the yard in stained t-shirts and I'm playing and laughing with them. I'm happiest when I've just collapsed in bed next to my husband after a long hard day and neither one of us have the energy to get up and turn off the hallway light so we bargain back and forth..."I'll give you a thousand dollars if you turn it off" "I'll give you a foot rub tomorrow if you do it" '" I won't make you go to my mother's..." That's my happiness.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. AMEN !!!! now can we talk about that size 5 thing.
Don't you know that size ZERO is the new size 5.. We must now be expected to look like a10 yr old boy ...except for the plastic baggie boobies... size 36DD of course :rofl:

I am a 1949er and I too, "gave up" on the outrageous expectation thing ages ago.. No one ever died from eating at our house, and I wouldn't eat off the floor unless there was a pistol aimed at me..and even then, I might need to think about it..

Life is too short to stress about stuff that's not all that important in the long run..

I would rather my kids remember me someday for the fun things we did, than the fact that the laundry was always done, and the house was spotless :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Size ZERO?
I am so screwed...and not in a good way either! ;)
I still fall into the trap.. I get wrapped up in what everyone ELSE's expectations are of me. Then just when I feel overwhelmed and I'm stressing because I forgot to "Febreeze" the recliner...it hits me. Then I'm okay for awhile.
I'd hate to think how trapped I'd feel if I wasn't able to get myself back on track though...because I know how desperate it feels to be stuck in that mode.
And you're absolutely right..life is way to short.

Who was it who said "Twenty years from now, no one is going to know how clean my house was, but they will know if I've read to my children." (or something like that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. My kids still laugh about the "Great Clothes-basket Wars"
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:53 AM by SoCalDem
My sons refused to empty their clean clothes from the baskets, so I just kept buying more baskets:evilgrin:..

I made them do their own laundry from the time they could safely reach the knobs, and they would dump each others stuff into baskets and "steal" the dryer for their own..

Then they would unceremoniously deposit the other's clothes in the hall by their room.. I would just step over the baskets..Hey if they could, so could I..

This went on and on, until they all decided to "work it out" and I guess they got tired of having to iron every morning before school..

I think I ended up with about 15 clothes-baskets:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. I'm with you.....
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 11:29 AM by AnneD
You have describe my ideal happiness. I'll let you in on a secret. Just wait til you hit menopause. Post menopausal women are a force to be reckoned with cause they are totally fearless. Just think of Code Pink.

Society has such a warped double standard for women. If you don't think I am speaking the truth ....ponder this.

A young mother harried with 2 other kids accidentally leaves her kid in a hot car. The child suffers form the heat and dies. How does the legal system treat her.

A young dad harried with 2 other kids accidentally forgets to drop the baby off at the day care and leaves the infant in the car and dies from the heat. How does the legal system treat him.

Or look at how long it has taken our society to recognize post partum psychosis as an illness needing treatment, not jail time.

edited to add that the best thing I ever did for my daughter was take away the tv from third grade to 10th. It did wonders for our self esteem and peace of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Aside from the political hell, I'm very happy
Yes I work too much, my house is rarely clean and I'm raising a daughter, but I love my life. I have a husband who adores me, a job that challenges me and a kid who...well let's just say I'm not sure what I did to deserve such an incredible child.

What would make me happier? Not having my brother deployed to the ME for the fourth time in five years. He leaves next month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think we're ALL under a hell of a lot of stress these days...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
softwarevotingtrail Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. No need for a gender war, men and women are both under the gun now
Men and women both are both dealing with the trials and tribulations of daily life. In different ways, perhaps, but it's kind of a wash when you get right down to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Poll rendered moot by stilted questions -- typical RW crap n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sailor65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sounds like
more women should have asked more questions before they got married, and maybe been more selective about their men??

I work 60+ hours without exception, and my wife works as well. We share our household work, and when she's not feeling up to it (Often since she's had health problems) I have no problem whatsoever taking up the slack. I join her in planning, executing, and managing the family's activities, and will not hesitate to grab the vacuum cleaner....

My wife and I talked at great length before marrying about all this stuff, and knew exacly what to expect from one another, from child care right down to who will typically load the dishwasher.

I read a lot of editiorials on this topic and it always slays me how many people complain about a spouse (Of either sex) not living up to his or her hopes for shared responsibility yet never took the time to sit down and share expectations BEFORE heading to the altar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. you assume a lot
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 06:08 PM by redqueen
i'm sure many people do discuss these things with their significant others before marraige... but people change, and in some cases not for the better


as for your 'be more picky' idea... surveys from all over the world back up the conventional wisdom that men do LESS around the house, whether both people are working full time or not. there's not some huge pool of guys who are willing to pull their weight around the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hey, guess what?? I LOVE MY JOB. I AM HAPPY.
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 04:24 PM by sparosnare
In fact, if I didn't have my job and have an identity outside the home, I don't think I would be as happy. I am not dependent on a man, I am totally self-sufficient - that makes me happy too. It gives me the opportunity to have a relationship with a man where I can be an equal, and THAT makes me happy.

Of course this poll is irrelevant anyway, since happiness cannot be measured on a scale. It's strictly subjective.

"Women have always been the designated worriers in the families" - LOL! Dumbass sexist whomever wrote this. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. "Dumbass sexist " here, I guess..
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 04:37 PM by SoCalDem
During my 38 year marriage, and various jobs/careers since age 11 (worked about 38 years off and on) , 99.999999% of the women I know, have known , were the designated worriers..

The men I have known seem to be pretty optimistic and felt that "things would work out"....

Everyone's different.. I'm happy for you.. I've had the "career", the "part-time", "the stay at home".. I consider myself lucky to have been able to participate, and I am not into calling people dumbass for merely telling their experiences :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. It's very subjective - and I'm sorry I called you that.
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 05:09 PM by sparosnare
I was assuming that "designated worrier" phrase came from the article and that a man wrote it - not you. I've read a gazillion of your posts and would never have intentionally called you that. My apologies.

You're right, everyone is different. I am an optimist and always feel "things will work out". I don't think I never would have survived some of the experiences in my life otherwise. There's something to be said about making the best of any situation and I try to live my life that way - why worry? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No problem
:hi:

I know how annoying these dumbass (and i DO mean it this time) "studies" are.. Basically NO ONE is happy these days.. men or women, young or old.. It troubles me to know that my own kids (3 grown sons) will have to struggle more than we have, and may not ever have the opportunities we had:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. My husband was a house husband while I worked.
Then, after I retired, I became a housewife while he worked. He got the babies to take care of. I got the guilt of not being with my babies, but knew they were well cared for and oh so loved.

Then I got the kids in their teenage years. Wow, that was really hard. Teaching them to drive about scared me to death. But I would not change a thing. We raised our kids together, switching off jobs, chores and careers. We didn't make a lot of money by doing the switching around. We hardly had vacations, our cars were always old but we raised some really great children. I guess I'm luckier than a lot of women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. Big Plus in 1970. The economy was better.
More take-home pay

Less hours needed to work

Mortgage, necessities could be easily paid for with one paycheck

More free time for recreation

A lot of groceries cost less than a dollar to buy (marked with the "cents" sign)

Average cost of a home: $40,000

Teacher's salary: $8,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. In 1970 my dad was able to buy our home for an amount equal to his annual salary.
Good luck with that these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
52. Average cost was a lot smaller, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frosty1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Women in 1970
were not stuck in unhappy marriages because they had no choice. In 1970 I could afford to support myself and my children. I could afford clean safe housing for my family. My child support covered the cost of daycare so I could work and support my family. I could afford food shelter clothing and utilities. I could afford insurance and taxes. Could I do the same today? I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
softwarevotingtrail Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. inflation is dead - except for health care, education, and housing
But at least we can buy cheap Chinese-made TVs and factory-raised meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Yes they were stuck in unhappy marriages and there were no shelters!!
I couldn't even get the electricity in my own name with out my husbands permission, even though we were separated!
I took the electric company to court and fought for TWO YEARS and I finally won in the Appeals Court that the
Electric Company could no longer discriminate against single, separated, divorced or widowed women!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
53. If you received the child support you were awarded, good for you.

My sister, in the early 80's had to fight tooth and toenail to get it.

So did/do many other custodial parents then and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. Link to poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. I think things were on an upward trend for women then.
The women's movement was just getting rolling. I'm not sure whether a majority of women were sensing that, though. Today our political situation is going downward!

I did see a stat that married women are less happy than single women, whereas married men are happier than single men. And, divorce causes a woman's economic status to lower, while men's increases. (Since I don't have links, take it fwiw.)

I would guess (just a guess!) that many of us see ourselves falling short of what our mothers did as mothers, and perhaps men remind us of that, still expecting us to do most of the parenting and housework and basically be more like their own mothers. At the same time, we may see ourselves falling short of what our male counterparts achieve, because of glass ceilings, taking time for motherhood, wage discrimination, etc. If there's pressure to be what your mother was AND what your husband is, the very struggle is frustrating and exhausting. Again, totally just one guess and certainly doesn't apply to all in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. "divorce causes a woman's economic status to lower, while men's increases."
Totally true then as it is now. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. Really, what a rotten deal we've ALL received
Going from ONE person able to support a family working 40 hours to the NECESSITY of TWO people each working 40 hours (or more) to support a family. And often STILL having problems getting by.

What we need is 20 hour work weeks for everyone, affordable housing (i.e housing as housing NOT an investment) and a shift in values away from so much materialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's a brave man, who tells women "what they really need". lol!
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 06:16 PM by BlooInBloo
EDIT: Or "what her problem really is".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
38. Women were working and divorcing in 1970!!
Edited on Thu Sep-27-07 06:20 PM by Breeze54
The mid 60's had fault based divorce and then by the 70's it was no fault divorce and easier to get one!

But it wasn't easy at all.

Adultery, Desertion, and Constructive Desertion: A Look At Fault-Based Divorce

By Elizabeth Langer

http://www.elizabethlanger.com/articles20.htm

__________________________________________________________

Prior to 1939, pre-marital unchastity was a ground for divorce in Maryland. Pre-marital unchastity of the wife, of course. Husbands were permitted some degree of latitude.

Fault-based divorces, that is divorces based on adultery, desertion, imprisonment for at least three years, or insanity, as well as pre-marital unchastity, were the only divorces available in Maryland from 1841 until 1937. In that year, the Maryland legislature added voluntary separation for five years as a basis for divorce. That provision permitted the granting of a divorce to a couple who had mutually agreed to separate and had, in fact, lived separate and apart for the required period without any regard to fault.

In 1969, the legislature took a giant step that affected the institution of marriage itself. Divorce based on non-voluntary separation was enacted. This made it possible for one spouse to obtain a divorce over the objection of the other, even where no fault had found its way into the marital equation. Currently in Maryland, a divorce may be obtained after a one-year voluntary separation or a two-year non-voluntary separation.

While no-fault divorces, those based on voluntary or involuntary separation, provide the basis for the vast majority of divorces in most jurisdictions, Maryland, unlike the District of Columbia, has elected to retain fault grounds along with no-fault grounds. The two most prevalent fault-based grounds are adultery and desertion.

more...


The Contentious Debate About No-Fault Divorce: Who is Most at Risk?

http://www.aamft.org/Press_Room/Press_releases/risk.asp

Viewpoints of Therapists

In Michigan and a handful of other states, legislators are trying to make it harder for couples to divorce. The proposed laws would repeal blanket "no-fault" laws in the hopes that additional hurdles would prevent some divorces, particularly when one spouse objects or the couple has minor children. Under the proposed reforms, grounds for the divorce would have to be proved if one spouse does not consent to the split.

Returning to fault-based divorces could, depending on one's position: save marriages or create even uglier divorces; give women leverage to demand more child support or financially drain them through endless court battles; and protect children from the scars of divorce or exacerbate the scarring through increased acrimony between divorcing parents.

It could also create a booming business for marriage and family therapists (MFTs) due to provisions requiring education and counseling. Furthermore, it could attract to therapy couples hoping to either mend their marriage or agree to divorce to save themselves from the ugly battle involved in proving fault. But the increase in business might be offset by the difficulty of counseling uncooperative, resistant clients participating only because the law requires it.

More....


Until no-fault divorce, it was difficult to even get a divorce!!

I was divorced in 1983, after three long years of filing and waiting etc.
I then had to wait another year for it to be final!!

But I was working full time in the mid to late '70's and I was married and had young kids.
I knew a lot of women (co-workers) also working then, who were married with kids.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
41. Uh-huh, blame it on feminism/liberation. How about blaming it on:
a social climate that is increasingly inhospitable to feminist ideas and women in general.

I blame our obnoxious patriarchal culture full of small isolated families and lacking any real sense of community in most places - women are alone - in our families, we are still expected to do the bulk of the work, period - housework, childcare, the very basic things that everyone living in a space should contribute to, and then work outside the home as well.

It's not the "outside the home" work that hurts us - it's the still-kicking idea that we should be unpaid domestic servants in our homes full of other people with working arms and legs and eyes who should be able to take care of themselves.

Women may have been more accepting of this position back when (at least externally, because let's not delude ourselves about the ability of people - especially women who are taught to put the happiness of others before their own - to pretend at happy) but that doesn't mean it was good for them or for society. I've also seen statistics showing that women are HAPPIER when they have their own job and income than they are at home. So I don't think employment is the source of the unhappiness - the unhappiness is the result of being a woman in a culture that loads its expectations and bullshit standards on your back and still expects you to jog around in stilettos smiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Then don't choose to do it then
make a choice and stop blaming everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. That doesn't even make sense.
Care to clarify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tian Zhuangzhuang Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. It's just as much a womans culture as it's mens
Woman are the majority in this country. They also run almost all the households and raise and teach the next generation of children male and female.

The idea it is mens fault that woman do to much housework is bordering on silly.

The idea that the men in this country are exclusively responsible for its culture is a bizarre insult to woman everywhere.

I've heard this complaint before and have always been curious what legislative remedy do you propose to solve this problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. I didn't say it was men's fault.
Read more carefully - I blamed the patriarchy, not men. The overarching control structure and value set of our culture got the blame.

And there is no "legislative remedy" - the remedy is for all human beings to start seeing all other human beings AS human beings and treating them as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
42. Interestingly
every reason mentioned on why women are not happier is something outside of themselves, instead of having to do withe choices they make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-27-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. Maybe women shouldn't let OTHERS decide for them what they "should" be
or how they "should" be.

THEN maybe they'd be happier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Exactly
When the focus is always on others definition of you, you will never regain power. When the focus is internal, it doesn't matter what others think of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
46. I rarely disagree with you to such an extent
In 1970 our family did not live the kind of life you describe, and neither did many in our working-class neighborhood. When I reflect on the families of my friends, and my sibs' friends, I can remember only a few whose mothers didn't work. Most families of my acquaintance couldn't have gotten by otherwise.

As a nurse my mother was able to work evenings and nights, so my parents handled childcare in shifts. When both parents were working, babysitting was handled by the older kids.

The dual incomes provided for necessities and few luxuries. There was no money for college. Family vacations were car trips. None of us ever traveled by air until we were adults.

But there are two things we had in our family that I rarely saw in families that were better off than us.

One was the example of a marriage that was a true partnership based in mutual love and respect, and the desire of each to make life better for the other.

The other was an upbringing that encouraged self-sufficiency. The girls as well as the boys were encouraged to pursue careers, not marriage. Both my parents supported this, but it was my mother who expressly established it. Success in chosen fields was a source of pride and joy to my parents as much as any grandchild.

Finally, I think the poll is bullshit, so it's no surprise I wouldn't agree with any analysis of why it's true. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
50. since becoming a SAHM I've been way happier.
I do waitress 2 nights a week. But I have to say, and I know this is not everyones experience, I am much happier at home taking care of the baby and the house. I love not having to get everything done on the weekend, and I can get extra stuff done around the house as well. We're poor, but I don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
51. Why should anyone be happy?
that's just daft. Men have never been happy. Frankly, I'm glad that women are just as miserable now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
57. Groups of people most times become less happy when they get what they thought
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:46 AM by Flabbergasted
they wanted. They frequently just want the "next better thing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. and i think that "grass is greener" thing happens too
Every time you go for something else, you usually have to give up something ... and once committed to the new thing, it's harder to get back what you lost..

People have forgotten that there is a difference between "different" and "better"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC