Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: The Luckiest Network On Television

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:09 PM
Original message
MSNBC: The Luckiest Network On Television
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=627

MSNBC: The Luckiest Network On Television
Filed under: Big Media, Propaganda, General — Mark @ 2:41 pm

MSNBC may be the luckiest network on television. Republicans are threatening to boycott the cable net. That’s kind of like having lepers threaten to not French kiss you.

It all began when David Shuster asked Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) if she could name the last soldier from her district who was killed in Iraq. She could not, so he told her who it was. It was later reported that the soldier Shuster named was not from Blackburn’s district and Shuster apologized for the error on air. Now it turns out that Shuster was right in the first place. But being right was never a major article of concern for the right and they are still hammering Shuster. Even Brit Hume at Fox News participated in the pile on.

Now, according to Politico, Republicans are escalating the battle to new heights:

“We don’t mind skipping MSNBC. No one watches that channel anyway,” says a high-placed Republican consultant.

Word is, a growing number of GOP lawmakers have become mysteriously “unavailable” when asked to appear on MSNBC.


This would be a sublime development. I have long been advocating that Democrats and progressives swear off of Fox News (see Starve The Beast). Rupert Murdoch and his media megaphone is openly hostile to our agenda and our representatives. They will only use these appearances to distort our message and derail our mission. Studies have proven that their audience is unreceptive, and even antagonistic, to us and by appearing we will be rewarded more with ridicule than respect.

It has been difficult to advance this strategy because the siren’s call of the TV camera still lures people to Fox. Now, ironically, it is Republicans who are openly promoting the concept in reverse. If their effort has the residual effect of causing a reciprocal boycott of Fox, it will be well worth it. They won’t miss MSNBC and we won’t miss the further propagation of their propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. "That’s kind of like having lepers threaten to not French kiss you."
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

"High-placed Republican consultants" want you to watch propaganda instead:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. But, who will Tucker talk to?
:shrug: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hot damn! I want to be boycotted by Republicans, too! What do I need to do?
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4.  Show your intelligence and empathise with the downtrodden and they
won't come near you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I never realized they were that easy to get rid of!
Why is then when we insult them here on DU they start crawling out of cracks to defend their cause like roaches?

Do we need to get Shuster to come here with his super mojo to do a formal fumigation next time?

I wonder how much he'd charge to take this talent on the road? He could call it something like The Mobile Republican Exorcism Tour.

He'll be rich beyond his wildest dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I detect the aroma of male cattle droppings
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:04 PM by rocknation
...It was later reported that the soldier Shuster named was not from Blackburn’s district and Shuster apologized for the error on air. Now it turns out that Shuster was right in the first place...

TORO TURD! It's far more likely that after a phone call from the Bush monarchy, Shuster was ORDERED to apologize and PRETEND he got the story wrong!

:mad:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, that pesky truth just keeps popping up. Even Politico has to admit its existence.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wait, so now Schuster was correct?
Last I heard, here, the soldier wasn't from her district. Interesting. Apparently Limpballs and others went after him. But I'm sure they'll now do the right thing and update their info and apologize. <crickets>

"But as today's Memphis Commercial Appeal article suggests, it's not totally clear that Shuster made a factual error. Yes, Blackburn's office did not receive a notice from the Army, but Bohannon's last legal address (and where he lived for a year before joining the Army) was in Blackburn's district.

Shuster appealed for further time to look into it, but Abrams shipped the reporter to apologize on air during Wednesday's 6 p.m. hour:"

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/television/dan_abrams_and_shusters_apology_67962.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC