|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:35 AM Original message |
silly question (maybe) but on DU why so much dislike for Hillary and love for Bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm coming around to Hil myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. For the most part Bill Clinton did ok but he did force welfare beneficiaries to walk the plank. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. the welfare reform bill on 1996 was much needed legislation and has worked well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:54 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. When you make people work for benefits you hire slave labor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
31. work for benefits? I do. Don't you? What's wrong with a 5 year limit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. low wages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. low wages are the cause of poverty, not moving people from welfare to work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. The welfare reform bill of 1996 was bad and is still bad! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. I didn't intend to brag and I have NO hand in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. What a crock!!! Worked for who?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. being on welfare doesn't get you out of poverty n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Working at minimum wage doesn't either! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. So I was totally against her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. I love them both so I find the Hill hate absurd, to say the least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. I love them both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
32. I also love them both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think it is Charm and Charisma... but most people who are smooth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sukie1941 (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. We're not voting for rally queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
6. Does that mean the New Democrats should have cross burnings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
7. Actually I dislike them both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. Hating on Bill is becoming en vogue as well.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Yes...definitely escalating in the Hate Bill category. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
10. Bill Clinton was not a woman + he had the con man skills which many politicians possess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:04 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. FDR used those con man skills too but he built the new deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terisan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I agree. Who is the FDR for our times? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
14. Hillary's a woman and men can't stand she wants to be president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. It has nothing to do with Hillary's Gender. It has mostly to do with Hillary's agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sukie1941 (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. So, define Hillary's agenda for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-02-07 04:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
49. Her agenda: Toeing the corporate line aka Corporatism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. The sexism charge is the equivalent of the repukes wrapping thermselves in the flag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
17. They are two different people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Bill's 2 terms are over and while there is nostalgia for the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Well put jcrew, I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Thanks, there are too many hillraisers here that any criticism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. You obviously have an agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. IMHO, BS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. It is the dire need to transform the agenda and policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sukie1941 (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. So, define the agenda and policy changes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Continuing with the status quo is ruinous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sukie1941 (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I was referring to a previous question by a different author |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. I don't think the animosity toward the Clintons is exclusive to either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. Cozy, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
23. Lately watching Bill is like watching paint dry...! the guy's an old/good con. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
28. I dislike both of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
36. Bill kept us out of war. Hil wants to keep us in one. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakefrep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. Because Hillary's a bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. And there ya go. Think of all of the sites where you'd expect to see this tripe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Ah, the real reason comes out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-30-07 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
48. I like them both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC