Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schadenfreude News of the Day: GOP fears Giulia911 nomination could break the party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:08 AM
Original message
Schadenfreude News of the Day: GOP fears Giulia911 nomination could break the party
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 10:08 AM by BurtWorm
:evilgrin:

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/09/30/giuliani/


Religious right may blackball Giuliani

Christian conservative leaders privately consider supporting a third-party, anti-abortion candidate should Rudy Giuliani win nomination

By Michael Scherer



Sept. 30, 2007 | WASHINGTON -- A powerful group of conservative Christian leaders decided Saturday at a private meeting in Salt Lake City to consider supporting a third-party candidate for president if a pro-choice nominee like Rudy Giuliani wins the Republican nomination.

The meeting of about 50 leaders, including Focus on the Family's Dr. James Dobson, the Family Research Council's Tony Perkins, and former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, who called in by phone, took place at the Grand America Hotel, during a gathering of the Council for National Policy (CNP), a powerful shadow group of mostly religious conservatives. James Clymer, the chairman of the United States Constitution Party, was also present at the meeting, according to a person familiar with the proceedings.

"The conclusion was that if there is a pro-abortion nominee they will consider working with a third party," said the person, who spoke to Salon on the condition of anonymity. The private meeting was not a part of the official CNP schedule, which is itself a closely held secret. "Dobson came in just for this meeting," the person said.

The decision confirms the fears of many Republican Party officials, who have worried that a Giuliani nomination would irrevocably split the GOP in advance of the 2008 general election given Giuliani's relatively liberal stands on gay unions and abortion, and his rocky marital history. The private meeting was held Saturday afternoon, during a lull in the official CNP schedule. Earlier in the day, Vice President Dick Cheney had traveled to Utah to deliver a brief address to the larger CNP gathering. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney also addressed the larger group.

The decision has also been reported in an unsigned article by WorldNetDaily, a conservative online news service. "Not only was there a consensus among activists to withhold support for the Republican nominee, there was even discussion about supporting the entry of a new candidate to challenge the frontrunners," the article said. According to the Salt Lake Tribune, WorldNetDaily's editor, Joseph Farah, was attending the larger CNP gathering.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spirit of wine Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ghouliani has milked 9/11 beyond any other kind of perversion
known and he is running for president? What an enormous imbecile he keeps evolving into the longer he remains in the race. Shame is obviously not a word rudy recognizes, yet. May we all stay safe in the coming months from this administration.

-Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agree with OP and post afterward that Giuliani's 9/11 emphasis is
perverse and obsessional.

If the far-right nutbags don't think Giuliani is a pandering far-right nutbag enough, then they're even more wildly dangerous than I first supposed, and I've always supposed them to be unstable and menacing.

It would be historically instructive for Dobson et al to be isolated politically. Little chance of that taking place immediately, since their current field is stumbling over each other trying to pander to the prayer-in-the-schools voters.

But still it is a real fun thought that Jim Dobson would be left without someone to manipulate for the 2008 election, and that his colleagues around the country break away into a splinter movement, run some Neanderthal like Judge Moore, and cripple the GOP's chances for electoral victories ballot-wide and ballot-long.

They'd deserve what they get and it would be damned fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Mitigating circumstance.
It actually was THE moment of his life. It is ridiculous to think he was NOT emotionally affected just because he's a corrupt greedy bastard. STILL HUMAN. Still had a building fall on him. Still lost many people he personally knew, had been speaking to moments before. His obsession with 9/11 is perfectly reasonable.

Still not a good reason to vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I hear you on the human component but reflexively question that
emotional circuitry in Giuliani after the incident involving Haitian immigrant Abner Louima, who, in the custody of New York police, was told it was "Giliani time" before being sodomized with a baseball bat.

I am not suggesting that Giuliani is personally culpable, only that I associate his terms as mayor of NYC with pointless thuggery and insensitivty generally, of a kind and to a degree as to suggest that he is manipulating his coincidental association with the attacks on the World Trade Center and not obsessing about them out of emotion or compassion.

I could be wrong on this, I grant, and will keep an open mind.

But the overall record on Giuliani's terms as mayor are not encouraging to support a conclusion that he is emotionally bound to the losses suffered that morning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Uh, I do NOT defend Giuliani's embarrassing record as Mayor.
But I don't 'gook' him because of that. You know what 'gooking' is. It is doing whatever you can to assure yourself that your enemy is not human. It's how we were able to kill the Vietnamese. The "gooks."

Giuliani is human. He is a jerk. An adulterer. Quite possibly a heartless racist. But deciding that he could not be traumatized on that basis? That he is incapable of standard human reaction? That's "gooking." And you should be ashamed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemeupwhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Add the NRA to the list.
Rudy: "I didn't mean all the 'restrict guns crap' I spouted during my term as mayor. I've seen the guns, er, light".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dodson, Bauer, Perkins, among others who advocate SelfInterest OVER COUNTRY
Selfish and Myopic...these dudes Know No Shame....

Then they dump Rudy under the bus....like they are cleansing themselves?

No Amount of toilet paper can clean their anal orfices...they are shitty ass peeps who should be in the wooden stockaid for a month ...peeps can throw rotten eggs on them...Punishment indeed...

Republicans have fucked up so badly these past years of their dominance and control...and they want more??? to Fuck us into submission? What makes those EVIL Bastids think/tick???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Many of us longtime wonks ogn the Leftish side saw this coming years ago. G9/11
is the manifestation of the disease, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. OH, so this is suddenly the Pundits and Significant GOPers
are suddenly "talking up" Mike Huckabee. Even Balzx on MTP.
Huckabee has moved up in the polls. The Christian Coalition
can make people jump, can they not????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. News flash......the GOP is already broken..we've just been waiting for the pieces to fly apart. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. GOOPERS Hate Dems So Much They Will Likely Vote For Any GOOPER
But every vote for a right wing third party that takes way votes for the GOOPERS helps...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kicked and recommended. Bwahahahaha. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. 4 Years ago, Salon had an article about how a re-election of Bush would split the Republican Party
...I'm still waiting...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You don't see the cracks?
If the Dems were stronger and more sensible themselves, they'd use a crowbar on what's left of the GOP and finish it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Yeah, but Bush isn't pro choice.
Those pindicks would vote for Quasimodo, but not wanting to throw women in jail for using birth control is a deal-breaker for 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. And that's why he won't be the nominee.
It'll be Uncle Fred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Just As I Predicted...Right On Time...
I've been hoping Ghouliani would emerge as the nominee...no matter how flawed our candidates, he's toxic to the GOOP. His "base" are those who want to win no matter what...ignore his past, ignore his hypocrisy cause "he's the only one who can beat Hillary". It's an obsession I've been noticing for a while and I've met a good share of Repugnicans who see Rudy as "the great white hope". This isn't going well with the fundies or the libertarian wings and I've long predicted the GOOP will schism should either Rudy or Mittens win the nomination. Dare I say, kinda like the crap being thrown around here about Hillary...but even more divided and strident.

Even though he says he's "out", I still could see Gingrich being "drafted" by the religious right as a third party...claiming to having to "destroy the party in order to save it". I also suspect that Ron Paul will attempt to be the Ross Perot next year...also breaking away from the party back to his old Libertarian Party or "Reform Party" and taking a number of votes with him.

Add to the growing anger, frustration with the "undercard" next year...all the indicted or soon to be indicted Senate and Congresscritters which is sure to help Democrats win more seats and the GOOP finger pointing and division will be even greater. I've long said that if Rudy becomes the nominee the religious right will stay home. No matter how Hillary appears to divide Democrats, it's nothing like what a Rudy candidacy would do on the other side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. At this rate this is going to be the first four party Presidential election in history. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. you know what is really sad and says alot about those type of people,
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 08:26 PM by AuntPatsy
I honestly don't feel that their lack of support for the 911 king has to do with his terrible misuse of the tragedy of 911 in order to attempt to gain voter's support as well as his obvious lack of any true credentials needed for such a high position, I think it is nothing more than his past of being divorced, once standing up for legalized abortion and his obvious love of dressing up in female attire..


My point is that anyone they would choose to run for them is NOT what this country needs now or ever. There is a good reason that politics and religion should stay separate and they prove it daily with the issues they find to be the most valuable when voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC