Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SCHIP Veto: Because the Medical Industrial Complex Isn’t Going Down Without a Fight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:37 PM
Original message
SCHIP Veto: Because the Medical Industrial Complex Isn’t Going Down Without a Fight
The United States has the most expensive second rate health care system in the world. We pay twice as much per person as the second most spendthrift nation—Switzerland---for care that puts us right at the bottom of industrialized nations on a whole host of health indicators like infant mortality and life expectancy. That means we are getting ripped off by our Medical Industrial Complex (MeIC), the system of pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, durable medical goods manufacturers, doctors, health insurers, nursing homes, health system consulting companies, health equipment manufacturers and suppliers and everyone who feeds at the trough. Health care spending makes up 16% of the GDP. That is 4 times what we spend on defense.

http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml

Countries with nationalized health insurance spend a much smaller portion of their GDP on health care. Or, put it another way, they spend much less per person per year—a quarter or less of what we spend—and yet have much better health. How? They spend their money more wisely and get better quality care, because their money goes for actual care, especially preventive services, which start the minute each person is born.

The health care system in the United States is not designed to keep anyone (except maybe a few CEOs) healthy. It is designed to breed disease and illness which can then be treated with very expensive patented band-aids. At every step of the way, some businessman is there to collect his cut. Your suffering is the MeIC's profit. Amplify your suffering, and you increase the MeIC's earnings.

Here is how it works. Many millions of Americans, especially children who tend to live in poverty in this country, have no preventive health care at all. Or, they are underinsured and get their care from the emergency room. They develop a host of diseases, like diabetes, high blood pressure, back and joint disease and obesity as well as smoking addiction by young adulthood. Once they begin working, some will become insured, and for ten to twelve thousand dollars a year, they will be able to see a doctor and get medications that will earn a pharmaceutical company thousands a year to treat problems that could have been prevented through childhood medical intervention. Others will remain uninsured, until they go on dialysis or have heart attacks or strokes and go on disability and federal Medicare or Medicaid, at which point they are fully insured forever, and they will make the Medical Industrial Complex tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for the rest of their lives---at tax payers expense---for diseases that could have been prevented if these people lived in a country where preventive health care for children and young adults was the norm.

Since everyone eventually goes on Medicare, the MeIC knows that sooner or later the federal government will fully ensure everyone, even those who problems are not severe enough to warrant disability. By forcing a large portion of the population to spend a majority of its life uninsured or underinsured, the MeIC knows that once the geriatric set becomes fully insured, there will be a lot of very profitable disease for it to treat. A lot of profitable preventable disease that they do not have in western Europe.

The trick, for the Medical Industrial Complex, is to keep that socialized medical care available only at the end of life and to make sure that there are plenty of years for disease to develop. Think of chronic disease as a crop that the MIC is nurturing. It does not want to harvest it until the time it right. Since no one wants to see people dying on the streets(that would make the flaws in the system all too obvious), hospital emergency rooms provide stop gap care, which we all pay for in higher bills.

Now, any attempt to provide increased health care to children would spoil the MeIC’s game. Preventive care early in life might make us a healthier country---and that might cut into the profits of the drug companies that want to see a bunch of us develop high blood pressure and diabetes. It might keep us from having premature strokes which would keep us out of nursing homes. It might keep us from getting fat, and then who would need all those artificial joints? How would the orthopedic surgeons pay for their Jags?

So, when W. vetoes SCHIP, he isn’t doing it just to protect 4 million private health insurance policies. He is making sure that the MeIC has 4 million lifelong customers in the future, people who will suffer from debilitating chronic disease that will require them to use treatments and surgeries and oxygen and other therapies that will deplete their savings and destroy their quality of life.

More importantly, he is making sure that no one has the bright idea of expanding the expansion of SCHIP. Because if those extra 4 million children were shown to grow up healthier, with fewer chronic diseases and less need for expensive medical care later in life, some smart government bureaucrat would notice and say “Hey, this is how we can solve our Medicare crisis! Let’s start taking care of people when they are young! That way, when they reach Medicare age, they won’t be so sick, and we won’t have to spend so much money on them.”

The Medical Industrial Complex is not going to find many more Dumbyas. He is the last of a dying breed. The rest of the Republican Party seems to have noticed which way the mood of the country is blowing. That is why I think that this veto of the SCHIP expansion may be the equivalent of the second battle of Manassas, the MeIC's last victory in a war which they are going to lose only they do not know it yet. Cradle to grave insurance makes too much sense. It solves the nation's uninsured crisis, and it can help make people healthier so that when they reach Medicare age, they do not bankrupt the system.

And if the Medical Industrial Complex is really about health care, they can not argue with a plan to make the nation healthier, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R times 100!
this is one of the most clearly written pieces I've seen on the DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disorientedx3 Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I just don't understand
why everyone can't understand this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is one point that is being overlooked, however.
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 09:52 AM by Kajsa
We need universal health care for all in the US.

Why should one group alone fund SCHIP?
Isn't the funding contingent upon smokers
continuing to smoke, preferably heavy to
keep the coming coming in?

If this is a deterrent to smoking, and many smokers
quit, where would the money for SCHIP come from?

Shouldn't everyone be contributing to children's health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good point. Smoking taxes are prevention measures to make smoking
too costly for kids to start and to encourage people to quit. The federal government will actually make money if it can persuade people to quit smoking by imposing high taxes since the money it does not collect in taxes will be more than offset in the $$$ it does not spend in smoking related heart, vascular, lung and cancer related illness through Medicare and Medicaid. Remember heart disease and lung cancer are number one killers and Medicare spends a lot of money on end of life care.

With the moneys saved on not having to treat so much smoking related illness, there will be more tax money to provide everyone routine preventive care.

Tobacco is the Medical Industrial Complexes best friend. That is why you see the tobacco companies in the US and Japan moving into third world countries in tandem with health insurers like Prudential and drug companies. Industrialized world chronic disease is on the rise in the 3rd world and the MeIC intends to be there to reap their cut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. This is assuming a number of things.
One of them being smokers will quit if it's too costly.
This is highly debatable.
That does not deter all addicts, specifically, nicotine addicts.

The other assumption is that the insurance companies and HMOs
will direct the savings to SCHIP. Again, that's highly debatable.

No, it will be saved by the insurance companies and HMOs who
have no intention of turning it over to anyone else.
How will they calculate it?

Again, why shouldn't everyone contribute to children's health care?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. the real question
Is why haven't all the other industries of the US realize how screwed they are and fight for this. If Walmart, Exxon, GM all spoke up it wouldn't be long before real changes were made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Employers are speaking up, that is why single payer national health is on the table
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 03:05 PM by McCamy Taylor
Employers are tired of paying through the nose for health insurance that rises faster than inflation. They are demanding that the feds or the states take over the role of supplying health care to keep the work force healthy.

You didn't think that the Dems and moderate leaning Repubs like Arnold were talking about health care just because the voters wanted it, did you?

16% of the GNP is a huge lobby for the Democrats to buck, however the combined economic clout of all the nation's employers is even larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well-written and brilliant insight
Thanks

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC