|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:52 PM Original message |
Question: Does anybody here seriously believe that ANY of the Republicans can win in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rzemanfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. What makes you think the election will be legitimate? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. the question is, assuming it IS legitimate.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. They didn't actually win the last two. If we don't turn out a massive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalsoldier5 (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
44. They didn't win in 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. Too optimistic yes, they have a lot of secrets to protect and they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kutjara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't think the 'pugs want to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daninthemoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Could be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattomjoe (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
42. I've that thought too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not a chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. It will hardly be a cakewalk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. After the GOP scandals of Nixon and Agnew, Carter only beat Ford by 2% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. They stole two why not a third. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. Question: Does anybody believe it will matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. correction: one person called it ridiculous.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Yes, he made that statement to the PRESS, not in Congress... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. If they cheat. But you didn't ask if we will let them get away with it again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. I will never get my hopes up again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. I would think that a LOT of people on DU believe that a GOPr could win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
driver8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
17. Hell, I never thought Bush would get elected...silly me! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. They'll have to steal the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. I don't think they can... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
20. They would have to steal it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
21. Guliani will be tough. I think it is possible for him to win in PA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. A northeastener with a name ending in a vowel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. I hope you are right about that. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
22. In this racist sexiest country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
23. I am very pessimistic about our chances for the WH, so yes I do think the repugs can win it in 08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
24. I think they might be throwing the game in '08--gonna retool the party for 2012, AFTER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. depends on how good the smear campaign is, which is only thing in Hillary's favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. don't forget about that whole pesky 50 state primary thing first... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I hope the primaries aren't as easy as Hillary thinks they will be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. amen to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
26. I used to say no way baby Bush could win...or Ronnie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. Are our elections secure yet? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
30. Bush was re-selected in 2004. Anything is possible n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
32. I would never underestimate the Democratic Party's ability to blow an election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. perhaps the most salient point raised on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. Only if it isn't HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
34. It's possible, I suppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
35. I still think Rudy can win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
36. sadly, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConsAreLiars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-04-07 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
37. H. R. Clinton has a pretty good chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
38. I disagree. I think only Hillary has pulled far enough ahead of Rudy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
39. If they can't win in '08 they should consider doing something useful for change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
40. Yes, absolutely they could win... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
43. Nope....the GOP will have to stop picking candidates from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SergeyDovlatov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
45. judging from the fact that neocons are warming up to Hillary ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SergeyDovlatov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
46. judging from the fact that neocons are warming up to Hillary ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-05-07 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
47. Nope. Not a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 15th 2024, 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC