Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any way to spin all the Hillary-bashing by GOP candidates?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:41 AM
Original message
Any way to spin all the Hillary-bashing by GOP candidates?
There have to be ways to blow it back at them, use it as a weapon against them..... find a way to frame the Hillary pile-on as 20th century country-club, white male misogyny from an all-male, white slate of candidates that does not reflect the diversity of 21st century America. Any thoughts or other ideas?

Hillary supporter or not, I don't think this incessent Hillary-bashing is helpful at all, like the GOP is trying some mass-hypnosis: "Hillary BAD Hillary BAD" on the general population, as well as getting more to contribute $$$ to their campaigns, and mobilize otherwise ambivalent voters.

I think a Smackdown is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. No need for "spin". It is quite apparent the reason they focus on Hillary is that they have no
message of their own. They are outing themselves to the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. were voters that smart, the Swiftboat Liars would not have
influeneced the election in 2004.

The enlightened progressives at DU and elsewhere, and educated Dems have it figured out, of course. But they weren't going to vote GOP anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Exactly.
None but the most hardcore 20 percent'ers give a flying fuck what the GOP candidates say about Hillary, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zandor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. "I don't think this incessent Hillary-bashing is helpful"
You might want to start at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're scared of a girl
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Three words: sexism, sexism, sexism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly. And why not throw that back in their faces?
Make them DEFEND themselves, and shut their traps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Just say, "They want Hillary and all women behind a berka!" Give them a dose of
their own insane brand of rhetoric.

We need talking points like, " The Republican fundamentalists won't be happy until every woman is in the kitchen AND pregnant."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. I see much of the same here though
Looks like she may get a ride with pure maneuvering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. The GOP focus on Hillary is largely designed to leverage reactivity on the 'left' ...
... and thereby ensure her nomination. Rushing to her defense, and acting on the tautology that anything or anyone that the GOP opposes must be 'good' for Democrats, folks effectively abandon their own values and react rather than respond.

It's really quite remarkable. It worked during the "Clinton era" ... distracting progressives and liberals rushing to Bubba's defense as that administration was castrating welfare, handing a license to steal to the telecom industry, sabotaging national health care, screwing gays in the military, and engaging in more illiberal policy initiatives than one could shake a stick at.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Bill Clinton was "screwing gays in the military"?????????
You have got to be kidding me.

Because Bill Clinton was courageous enough to try to make life better for gays in the military, his poll numbers took a nose dive. Many people at the time thought that Clinton's views on gays helped Newt Gingrich win at the polls in 1994.

If you talk to analysts, they say that even if Bill wanted to help gays in the military it was a mistake to do so early in his first term.

Bill Clinton did the right thing but at a very high cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Don't ask. Don't Tell." is an abominable policy. Period.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:21 AM by TahitiNut
Gays have served honorably in the U.S. military since 1776. Sexual orientation has NOTHING legitimately to do with military service.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I agree.
But there was 0 chance that the military would have accepted gays openly serving. Bill Clinton got the most he could.

As a result, the REpublicans used the gay issue against Democrats in 1994 and subsequent elections. Why do you think so many states have anti-gay marriage laws on the books? Because the Repubs knew having those laws on the ballot would bring out their supporters in droves. You can argue that those bills defeated Kerry in 2004.

So, why should Dems support gay rights? Because it's the right thing to do. But has supporting gay rights cost Dems big time in elections? Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. She's the front runner they're trying to knock her off so their candidate
will bounce ahead. I am so frustrated that Edwards can't move up. But the "other" candidates are not going to get over their jealousy that Hillary is betting him. They will keep it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Rudy's Platform is--I am the best to fight the Terrorism war
and I am the only candidate that can beat Hilary Clinton.

This is his sole stump speech. Unfortunately, it has kept
him the Lead on GOP side. Every meeting this is the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. People tend to mock what they fear
Crazy human tendency.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. They say you can't trust government to get things right. They've proven
you can't trust a Republican government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC