Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox & Friends Say Seizing George Clooney's Medical Records & Rush Limbaugh's Are The Same Thing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:37 PM
Original message
Fox & Friends Say Seizing George Clooney's Medical Records & Rush Limbaugh's Are The Same Thing
Today on Fox and Friends there was a story on George Clooney's medical records being breached by several medical personnel. Several of them had been suspended. 27 (Doocy said) may be fired and even George Clooney said that may be a little harsh. This all stems from a motorcycle accident that George Clooney was involved in.

But then they took the story and tried to compare it to Rush Limbaugh's medical records being seized.

Doocy asked what George Clooney and Rush Limbaugh have in common. Judge Andrew Napolitan said that both of their medical records were illegally leaked. Judge Napolitano said that in the case of Rush Limbaugh it was a prosecutor who subpoenoed them.

The screen was split with a picture of George Clooney on one side and Rush Limbaugh on the other. The banner underneath said 'ER Secrets Spilled, Limbaugh's Suffered Same Fate.'

They talked amongst themselves to decide if George Clooney's medical records were leaked or peeked. Napolitano said Clooney's were peeked, Limbaugh's were leaked. Doocy said George Clooney's were leaked to the press and Camarato said she hadn't seen anything in the press. Doocy said they were leaked because they wanted to know the nature of Clooney's injuries and any information on the woman who was with Clooney and what she might have said.

<snip>

http://www.newshounds.us/2007/10/10/fox_friends_say_seizing_george_clooneys_medical_records_rush_limbaughs_are_the_same_thing.php

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. They slipped up
I'm sure they've been ordered to never talk about Rush's "problem" again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Yeah, thanks fauxfiends for bringing up that
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 01:05 PM by zidzi
nasty business of oxyrush and his blackmarket deals to stay high while trying to sell out our country spewing propoganda on the air..you pukefest tools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Look over here at this shiny thing!!"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I suppose they forgot to mention that it was the dreaded liberal ACLU
who defended Rush's rights to keep those medical records private, too... didn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Idiots! Stupid comparison.
Rush was doing something illegal which caused his records to be subpeonaed, while Clooney had his stolen. NO COMPARISON!

IDIOTS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Actually, they weren't subpoenaed. They were seized without a court order. n/t
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 12:53 PM by SteppingRazor
On edit: Edited to change "without a warrant or a court order" to "without a court order." the prosecutor did file a warrant, but no subpoena was filed with the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're not the same, but they were both the wrong thing to do.
Clooney's records were illegally leaked, Limbaugh's were illegally seized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Is the judge claiming that the subpeona
was illegal? If so, how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What subpoena?
The Palm Beach County prosecutor seized Limbaugh's records without a proper court order. It was a ridiculous breach of privacy. I'm no fan of Limbaugh, but I like jackbooted government officials even less. The prosecutor issued a warrant, but the clerk of court never issued a subpoena, as the judge handling the case was never informed. That's why the prosecutor had to give the records to the court after seizing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I was referring to the text of the OP.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 01:09 PM by SimpleTrend
From the OP: "Judge Andrew Napolitan said that both of their medical records were illegally leaked. Judge Napolitano said that in the case of Rush Limbaugh it was a prosecutor who subpoenoed them."

Are there two different judges being quoted? (or just a typo?)

I didn't know that judges issued subpoenas, and that clerks issued warrants. I would think that court clerks issued what judges authorized them to issue, but that's just me thinking outloud again.

I'm quite certain that even after researching the difference between the terms subpoena and warrant a year back or so, I still don't have a full grasp on the differences, summarized briefly as judges issue warrants, whereas other official government departments and their officers can issue subpoenas, but those are not from judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, you're right. Clerks issue subpoenas on the orders of a judge.
And in most cases, prosecutors can also issue subpoenas in their capacity as officers of the court.

As for the judge quoted in the OP, it's kind of confusing, becuase Limbaugh's records weren't actually leaked, to my knowledge. Clooney's were leaked to the media, but Limbaugh's were simply taken by the prosecutor, then surrendered to the court -- there was never any public access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Faux news is always diluting shit....the same my ass....fuck Faux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh yeah exactly alike.
If you don't count the subpoena and the legal fight involving the ACLU in Rush's case and the fact that Rush's records were part of a felony criminal investigation involving his illegal use of prescription drugs or that Clooney's records were turned over to the paparazzi rather than any legal authority and involved injuries suffered in a motorcycle accident. But other than that there was hardly any difference at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC