|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:25 PM Original message |
Poll question: Despite your feelings about Hillary as a candidate: how do you rate her as First Lady? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. The fact that I think she was a "good" first Lady has no bearing on what she would be as President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. From what I have heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. You do know that the VEEP has only two actual responsibilities? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Do you know that the first lady has only no actual responsibilities? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. So the First Lady is more important? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. Is one's wife more important than one's Veep? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. OMG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Ya know Cali |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Ok, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. no. not a bit sarcastic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Well I thank you for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. Yeah, and we know that the media never misrepresented the Clintons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think she did an excellent job at being a spouse of a President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Not a bit sexist, no, indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. So you're saying she wasn't married to Bill Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Disingenuous, much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. What crap is this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adigal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
26. She was a one term, and a couple of days Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
11. She did an absolutely wonderful job of being married to a President, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. The extreme talent of doing no job well is vastly underrrated in this culture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. Putting her in charge of health care reform was a disaster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. She joins a prestigious line of other "miserable failures" in that attempt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
20. She kicked ass. She dared to be a person instead of a lady. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Amen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Many of us who actually remember Eleanor Roosevelt weren't so easily impressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
23. Compared to who? Eleanor Roosevelt? Dolly Madison? Eva Peron? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adigal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. She was a huge distraction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-11-07 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. Who voted failure? How can one "fail" as a First Lady, anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC