|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-12-07 11:53 PM Original message |
Nader won what, 2% of the vote? Sheehan would get about the same hypothetically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Nader polled 2.74% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ralph Nader was on the supreme court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. There are many reasons why Gore "lost" in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It can't "only" be blamed on Nader-- but so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 03:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Perhaps Gore should have ran with someone like Nader, and not Joe Lieberman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 04:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Oh, I see. Gore should have run with Nader to keep Nader from opposing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Whatever makes it easy to sleep at night. Keep telling yourself that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It wouldn't have ever gotten to the Supreme Court if Nader hadn't been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I remember reading that Pat Buchanan had thousands more votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 02:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. But progressives couldn't control the ballot design. They could control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Good point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
7. More if Erik Prince and the fundies make big contributions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
8. Let's split the left because that's worked so well historically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. cindy's running for PRESIDENT? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 02:50 AM Response to Original message |
11. Clintons are Republicans, miscast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 03:31 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Yes, and the comparison of Nader to Sheehan is not apt either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 05:53 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. I Always Hear That Argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
16. Will this be the birth of a new Dem Clenis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
17. But 85% of Nader voters learned their lesson by 2004 and didn't vote for him again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
18. Um, Sheehan would get 0% of the Presidential vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-13-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
21. Cindy's running for president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC