Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ban Smoking Tobacco

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:55 AM
Original message
Ban Smoking Tobacco
Marijuana, meth, cocaine, legalize it!

:smoke: :crazy:

Or are all anti-smoking people consistent across the board?

The fact that we even have this smilie here: :smoke: makes me wonder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Honestly, if weed were legal, I'd have given up tobacco long ago.
:sigh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd be all over that - if you didn't include meth
Meth has got to be the worst drug of the bunch.... I'd rather be addicted to tobacco or heroin than meth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That'd be understandable if the OP included heroin rather than coke.
I believe I've seen monkeys who once addicted to cocaine, chose cocaine over food, to the point where they starved to death.

Legalize pot. Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I was that monkey for 2 months
Then I saw my ribs in the mirror.... it was easy to quit.

Meth is the worst of the worst. I was in NM in the mid 80's when it became popular My sister and my best friend got waaay into it (I was at NMSU) UGLY, UGLY stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. You'd legalize heroin then?
I know how bad meth is. I've snorted it, smoked it, eaten it, and dissolved it in cokes from fast food restaurants. I got sick and tired of being sick and tired, and got over it. I don't have links, but I've read that heroin addicts are MUCH MORE LIKELY to go back to their old ways than meth addicts who've kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes, w/ a doctor's prescription
and 3 layers of help offered.


There is a genetic component to addiction that is just recently being looked into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I know about the genetic component and the predisposition to addiction.
I'm curious as to what your "3 layers of help" could do for a genetic predisposition, and what it/they would change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Are you aware
that the UK legalizes heroin for its addicts? It's the maintenance and not the addiction. Witness the U.S. maintenance of an addiction far more profound than heroin: nicotine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't go out with someone blowing marijuana and meth in my face.
I was trying to enjoy a meal at an outdoor cafe recently when someone crossed the street and started blowing marijuana smoke at me. Your rights end at my nose!!! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good one!
Your post on the other thread cracked me up, plumes of smoke surrounding us, indeed.

And I wonder, how many of the anti-plumes/fumes of tobacco feel the same way about plumes/fumes of even nastier shit. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monktonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Sorry dude, I was a bit stoned that night.
Wont happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'll contribute something when I finish
this cigarette.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You're done now...... waiting.....
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Obviously
I am not for banning smoking. I generally agree with most other classifications of illegal drugs with the exception of marijuana, although I have no desire to use it. There would have to be some strong regulation of marijuana if it was legalized of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Second-hand smoke from marijuana
could give you cooties, or worse. Or maybe not, because smoking things other than tobacco are copacetic. Second-hand smoke from those other things bestow life-sustaining and healing minerals,vitamins,and waters upon the recipient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. my meaning
about marijuana being regulated is that it is a hallucinogen and should be regulated as to when it can be used and not used while operating moving vehicles and heavy equipment. Second hand smoke wouldn't bother me much as long as I could get some air, heh. However since second hand smoke from cigarettes has such a bad connotation now, I doubt smoking weed in public would be considered acceptable by many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. second hand pot smoke, lol
Oh my mind is racing. Maybe that's why violent crime is so low in Europe, contact highs! lol. I keed, I keed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUniverse Donating Member (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'd like to think anyone can smoke what they want as long...
as they don't make me or their children breathe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-14-07 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. No... I'll tell you. When cigarette smokers have to worry about going to jail like pot smokers do
then they can start to bitch about "fascism". :eyes:

Should pot be legalized? Abso-fucking-lutely. Does that mean people should be allowed to smoke it wherever they want? Er, no. Cities and towns regulate WHERE people can smoke cigarettes. That's not "oppression". So you have to step out to the curb to light up. Waaaah.

I used to smoke pot, back in my reckless youth. I'm glad I smoked that instead of cigarettes, which I'm certain would have been WAY more of a bitch to quit. But back when I did smoke pot, if someone had said "We want to make it legal- you can smoke it outside or in the privacy of your own home, but not in bars or restaurants".. would I have gone "Fuck no, fascist! How dare you anti-pot people tell me where and when I can light up"? No. Such a policy would be far saner than what we have now, and frankly protecting people in enclosed indoor public spaces from second hand smoke- of any kind- is a legitimate civic pursuit.

Pot should be legalized, regulated, and taxed. Meth is a horrible drug, but frankly right now we spend most of the $40 Billion "drug war" budget going after pot smokers. Maybe if we approached harder drugs, like meth, cocaine, etc. as a health problem and not a law enforcement one, adopting a harm reduction strategy like the Netherlands has, we could make a dent in the meth epidemic... particularly if we used the billions we spend now going after dangerous pot addicts like Willie Nelson and the late Carl Sagan, and funneled it into treatment on demand. Into fact-based education instead of lies that tell kids if they smoke pot they'll get date raped and their testicles will fall off. (Followed on the heels of an "abstinence only" message which tells kids with a straight face that NO ONE should have sex until marriage, when just about everyone does)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC