Glenn Greenwald: The Beltway Establishment’s Contempt For The Rule of Law

The Beltway Establishment’s Contempt For The Rule of Law
by Glenn Greenwald

The Washington Post’s Editorial Page, in the establishment-defending form of Fred Hiatt, today became but the latest Beltway appendage to urge the enactment of a special law providing amnesty to our nation’s poor, put-upon, lawbreaking telecoms:



Let’s leave to the side Hiatt’s inane claim that these telecoms, in actively enabling the Bush administration to spy on their customers in violation of the law, were motivated by the pure and upstanding desire to be “patriotic corporate citizens” — rather than, say, the desire to obtain extremely lucrative government contracts which would likely have been unavailable had they refused to break the law. Leave to the side the fact that actual “patriotism” would have led these telecoms to adhere to the surveillance and privacy laws enacted by the American people through their Congress in accordance with the U.S. Constitution — as a handful of actual patriotic telecoms apparently did — rather than submit to the illegal demands of the President. Further leave to the side that these telecoms did not merely allow warrantless surveillance on their customers in the hectic and “confused” days or weeks after 9/11, but for years. Further leave to the side the fact that, as Hiatt’s own newspaper just reported yesterday, the desire for warrantless eavesdropping capabilities seemed to be on the Bush agenda well before 9/11.

And finally ignore the fact that Hiatt is defending the telecom’s good faith even though, as he implicitly acknowledges, he has no idea what they actually did, because it is all still Top Secret and we are barred from knowing what happened here. For all those reasons, Hiatt’s claim on behalf of the telecoms that they broke the law for “patriotic” reasons is so frivolous as to insult the intelligence of his readers, but — more importantly — it is also completely irrelevant.

There is no such thing as a “patriotism exception” to the laws that we pass. It is not a defense to illegal behavior to say that one violated the law for “patriotic” reasons. That was Oliver North’s defense to Congress when he proudly admitted breaking multiple federal laws. And it is the same “defense” that people like North have been making to justify Bush’s violations of our surveillance laws — what we call “felonies” — in spying on Americans without warrants.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/14/4525/

after those Texas boots entered the oval office, before 9/11.

I urge everyone to contact their legislators tomorrow to ensure that the telcoms do NOT receive immunity.

Greenwald has been on the front of this fight Here is the link to Greenwald's column on Salon. http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/

The Electronic Frontier Foundation urges us all to take action:
https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=321&pg=makeACall

Christy Hardin Smith at FireDogLake has the phone numbers of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and a lot of important links here: http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/10/11/not-ready-to-make-nice/



Here are some talking points from the ACLU:https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?alertId=729&pg=makeACall&page=UserAction




More from Greewald: http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/10/11/klein_fisa/index.html