Conyers wants answers on pre-9/11 NSA program.

ProSense

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:10 PM
Original message

Conyers wants answers on pre-9/11 NSA program.

Conyers wants answers on pre-9/11 NSA program.In court documents released last week, former Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio revealed that “the NSA approached Qwest more than six months” before 9/11 “about participating in a warrantless surveillance program to gather information about Americans’ phone records.” In a letter to Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Justice official Kenneth Wainstein today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) requested “an immediate briefing on the facts” of the program as well as all documents relating to the “pre-9/11 activities and the legal basis for conducting them.”

Read the full letter here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LakeSamish706

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message

1. The problem that exists is that he can want answers, but he is unlikely ...

to get them if past performance holds up... So far they have not found a way to force this White House to provide what the legislators are asking for. Even issuing a Supeano doesn't work, so I doubt if they will get what they want.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

L. Coyote

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1

9. Reminded of Watergate yet anyone? The daily drip, drip, drip, in tiny increments

was what it took to sway public opinion. It was one new story a day, for over a year...... and viola, Nixon was outta town after the Hill Rs went over to the White House for drinks and an ass whooping.

Problem today, the Hill Rs need a huge ass whooping too! :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message

2. good luck mr. conyers

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ThomWV

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message

3. So, the Administration has given information to phone company CEOs that they won't give to Congress

Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 06:27 PM by ThomWV

If the phone company people were given enough information to know the programs were illegal then that was more information than has been provided to Congress - one presumes. After all, if Congress was briefed that an illegal program was in progress they would stop it because of its illegality, wouldn't they?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LakeSamish706

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3

6. One would hope that they would stop it, but who knows with having...

taken something like Impeachment off the table, you kinda loose any teeth that you might have had with regards to oversight and enforcement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

AuntPatsy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message

4. When are they going to realize these subpeona's and demands

we keep throwing at this administration will continue to be ignored? The only way we are going to get answers is Impeachment and I know conyers knows this.....I wish he had more people standing with him and with us that demand justice prevail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tekisui

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message

5. I think the Dem congress will aggressively pursue this one.

They care about their jobs. Who was bushco spying on in 2001? If it was terrorists, the spying didn't catch the highjackers, and is proven ineffective,unless they LIHOP. The object of the spying was most likely the Democrats, for political gain and manipulation. This is the only thing that our elected leaders will truly worry about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

RufusEarl

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message

7. The main fact was Bu$h wanted telecom officials,

to give them this information six months before the 9-11 attacks. What was the reason for this prior to 9-11? That's the question i want answered.

Peace!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

L. Coyote

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-15-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message

8. He's going over Hayden's head to his current boss. Hayden was NSA chief

then and is CIA director now. It is Hayden who has a lot of explaining to do!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Wed May 15th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.