IMPEACH/SUSPEND . . ..

I think this remains a very interesting post by someone else here . . .



QUOTE . . .

From Judiciary In '74-"If The President Be Connected In Any Suspicious Manner With Any Person..."
Posted by kpete
The following is from a report written and released by the Judiciary Committee in 1974 in the aftermath of the Watergate crisis.


In the (Constitutional) convention George Mason argued that the President might use his pardoning power to "pardon crimes which were advised by himself" or, before indictment or conviction, "to stop inquiry and prevent detection." James Madison responded:

If the President be connected, in any suspicious manner, with any person, and there be grounds to believe he will shelter him, the House of Representatives can impeach him; they can remove him if found guilty...

.....................

Madison went on to say contrary to his position in the Philadelphia convention, that the President could be suspended when suspected, and his powers would devolve on the Vice President, who could likewise be suspended until impeached and convicted, if he were also suspected.

is because of cheney. And if they impeached cheney first, which they could, the chances to impeach bush won't fly.

the reason Bush hasn't been impeached is because Democratic leaders can count to 67.

"Madison went on to say contrary to his position in the Philadelphia convention, that the President could be suspended when suspected, and his powers would devolve on the Vice President, who could likewise be suspended until impeached and convicted, if he were also suspected."

Make it two-fer.. get them both at the same time then appoint a replacement that both sides will agree on, or hold an emergency election a year early for president.

Take this criminals out of power now... before it's too late.

as well as other documents

Perhaps make photocopies and take to congrees critters

I think I know whhat I wil be doing soon

at how thoroughly the Founding Fathers got it.

There's probably that executive privilege problem we'd have to eliminate or avoid.

The will of the people IS there. We're just being trivialized. I don't know how to get over these hurdles. HR333 exists, and it got it's 21st signature.

That is what the "Urinary Executive" claim -- of which the Libby pardon is but one act -- dictates.

It recognizes no act of Congress or court, as long as it is "decidered" that there is "time of war."

DC Dem Impeachophobes, in the face of this madness, have opted for complicity -- approval -- exoneration for the regime.

But pressure is still building.

Those with their fingers in the dike may yet recognize that without impeachment, Redemption of Our National Soul might take generations to achieve.

And that their personal nightmares, for failing this once-great nation, are only beginning.

----
** Urinary Executive or Urinary Authoritarian Executive (slang, DCspeak) n., (en)title -- the "newly-discovered," or "inherent" (i.e., faith-based) Constitutional Authority for an appointed ruler (as opposed to elected leader) to piss down the back of the American People and tell them it's raining.

See also, Trickle-Down Economics

--