Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MURRAY WAAS: Gonzales Investigated Subordinates Who Were Likely To Testify Against Him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:32 AM
Original message
MURRAY WAAS: Gonzales Investigated Subordinates Who Were Likely To Testify Against Him
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 07:37 AM by kpete
Gonzales Investigated Subordinates Who Were Likely To Testify Against HimThe Huffington Post | Murray Waas | October 17, 2007 at 07:00 PM


Alberto Gonzales was briefed extensively about a criminal leak investigation despite the fact that he had reason to believe that several individuals under investigation in the matter were potential witnesses against him in separate Justice Department inquiries.

While Attorney General, Gonzales oversaw the probe into the disclosure of the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program to the New York Times. However, many of those under scrutiny in that investigation were likely to be crucial witnesses about whether Gonzales himself had violated the law while promoting the program as White House counsel and testifying about it to Congress.

Earlier, the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) attempted to investigate whether Gonzales and other government attorneys acted within the law in authorizing and overseeing the program. President Bush personally intervened in the spring of 2006 to shut down that investigation by preventing OPR investigators from gaining the necessary security clearances.

.................

....during the course of the leak investigation, the official said, people were asked about their contacts with the press, whether they disagreed with aspects of the Bush administration's eavesdropping program, and even their personal politics.

more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/huffpolitics/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's okay. I expect our dem reps to be giving Al blanket
immunity for anything he's done any day now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. we need a truly independent prosecutor. anyone connected with bush...
the what used to be 'justice' department and any federal units of law enforcement or intel are all corrupted.

they cannot be trusted to investigate each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes, but knowing our luck, the Dems will appoint Ken Starr as special
prosecutor. Fine job that he did the last time. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's unreal
that there are no real consequences for these violations of our nation's principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, it would surely be a waste of time to look into this
But by golly, some kid with a joint needs to be put away for 30 years. It'll teach him a lesson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. that's some legacy Gonzo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Waas is the BEST
He is a great reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. knr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Whoa. Not too transparent of Al, was it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. afternoon kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Transparent, blatant, in-your-face Obstruction of Justice. Just another day for BushCabal™. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not to mention, sounds like BUSH is guilty of obstruction of justice!
"President Bush personally intervened in the spring of 2006 to shut down that investigation by preventing OPR investigators from gaining the necessary security clearances."

Crimes, crimes, and more crimes. Give these guys a Ph.D. in criminality, for Piled Higher and Deeper than ever before in US history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
IMPEACH CHENEY FIRST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC