Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A HISTORY OF AMERICAN MILITARY COMMERCIAL IMPERIALISM -A VISUAL TIMELINE 1770-1945

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 02:07 PM
Original message
A HISTORY OF AMERICAN MILITARY COMMERCIAL IMPERIALISM -A VISUAL TIMELINE 1770-1945
The Americans learned Imperialism from the best.



And America wanted to be equal.



They started small:



But their message was clear and simple:



And they immediately went about attempting to acquire Canada.



They failed.



However, they still opened plenty of new markets to the West:



Of course, there were people already living there. No matter. They were considered 'foreigners' and they were crushed.



Alas, the military wasn't just used on foreigners. Domestic opposition was also crushed.



All that military action was expensive, however, so this guy put together the financial package to pay for it all:



Hamilton's idea was to bind the individual states to the more powerful federal government through debt to foreign banks. It worked.


At around this time, America went on its first overseas adventure - against muslims who threatened their commercial interests.



But unlike almost all the Presidents before and after him, Thomas Jefferson ultimately preferred shopping to military adventurism. The effect was the same though. More debt and new markets:



But it was quickly back to military adventurism in 1812, when the Americans again invaded Canada.



And again they failed.



During this time, what developed in America were two competing economic systems, both rooted in debt capitalism.

Wage slavery:



and actual slavery



The competition between the two came to a head several times over the issue of opening new markets. One sticky point was Texas - where actual slavery was preferred.

Technically, however, Texas still belonged to Mexico. Of course that didn't stop Americans from annexing it in 1845.



Mexico was mad. They saw the Americans as invaders.



Mexicans defended their land from invading Americans. Some Americans were killed. This was called The Thornton Affair.



President Polk insisted "American blood has been shed on American soil." (It hadn't.)

A young Abraham Lincoln drafted in response The Spot Resolution which would have required the President to prove the contested spot was actually on American soil. (It wasn't.)

No matter. War was declared on Mexico and before long, the Americans marched into Mexico City.



And as a result, the Americans opened some new markets:



Just in time, too, because apparently a lot of gold was found the next year.



Eventually, in the fight to open new markets, the two economic systems could no longer co-exist. The answer? War.



Wage slavery won, and Sherman burned the South for good measure:



For the next several years, the Americans busied themselves with market consolidation, and liquidation of the previous residents.



By the end of the 19th century, America was starting to look like this:



And mammon was the American king:



Just as Americans were running out of new 'domestic' markets to open, Alfred Thayer Mahan wrote his watershed book The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783 where he claimed that a nation's economic power has everything to do with its Navy's ability to force open new markets overseas.

It was music to the ears of these people:



Soon, conveniently, the USS Maine sailed into Havana harbor and promptly exploded (from the inside).



President McKinley ordered a court investigation which concluded: “The court has been unable to obtain evidence fixing the responsibility for the destruction of the Maine upon any person or persons.”

Teddy Roosevelt quipped that the "white-livered President McKinley has no more backbone than a chocolate eclaire.”

And then the newspapers sold a war anyway:



Good thing, too. Look at all the new markets which were opened up:



McKinley was then assassinated, the American left was blamed, and Teddy Roosevelt became President.

And, after sponsering a revolution in Columbia-owned Panama, he promptly set about building a massive canal there:



Of course, all this economic militarism cost a lot of money. Somebody had to pay for it. During all this time, the American market suffered periodic economic destablizations. For example, there was:

the Panic of 1819
the Panic of 1837
the Panic of 1857
the Panic of 1873
the Panic of 1884
the Panic of 1890
the Panic of 1893
the Panic of 1896
the Panic of 1901
the Panic of 1907
the Panic of 1910-1911


Essentially, as the Empire absorbed more and more markets, common people kept losing their shirts:



Somehow, though, the rich still had the money to finance every new expansion of the market.


A "solution" finally came in the formation of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

Not everyone was happy about it. Congressman Charles August Lindburgh (father of the future pilot) warned against it:

"This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed... The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill."


But the President signed it anyway:



With the American military-commercial machine now completely owned by private banks, the American Empire could finally afford to take on the vast and profitable European market by destabilizing its competition, the old-world Empires.

Of course, they also needed an excuse to drag the American people to what in their narrow perspective was a 'foreign' war.

Conveniently, American newspapers got ahold of the Zimmerman Telegram, a secret communique in which Germany attempted to recruit Mexico to fight against the U.S.



And that was that. The war was on for America:



Luckily, the U.S. Navy had the most modern battleships in the world:



This is, of course, thanks to a young Franklin Roosevelt, then Secretary of the Navy:



The ensuing war effectively ended the competing commercial empires of Germany, Russia, and Austria/Hungary, while simultaneously devastating the competing commercial empires of Britain and France.

No wonder they called it "The Great War".



Oh sure. There were people who tried to say "NO", but by that point, it was simply impossible to stop the convergence of influence and interests.



And so, Woodrow Wilson initiated the first global market experiment, The League of Nations, and everything was hunky dory again until... whoops. Another panic!



Could this be the 'day of reckoning' Lindburgh Sr. warned about?

A whole army of World War I veterans thought so. They marched on Washington demanding immediate payment of their service bonuses:



They even occupied Washington D.C. itself:



But eventually, they too were crushed:



They were driven from the city by the U.S. Army, which was commanded by two officers who would soon become world-famous, Douglas MacArthur and Dwight Eisenhower:



A year later, F.D.R. swept into power, a President-for-life:



Always looking for new markets, American banker Imperialists rebuilt Europe and financed proxy Empires. They created Franco:



and Hitler:



In 1937, the Imperialist Japanese army raped and destroyed Nanking, China:



Eighty percent of Imperial Japanese oil at that time was imported from the United States.


Just in case the proxy empires wouldn't remain profitable, however, the Americans began building the Pentagon on September 11, 1941.



Meanwhile, American-proxy Hitler pushed deep into the territory of the American-allied USSR:



And then in December of 1941, the American-allied Soviets pushed back



So, another excuse was needed to drag the myopic American people to war. Franklin D. Roosevelt arranged with the Imperialist Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor.



The Japanese conveniently failed to hit the submarine base, the massive fuel storage tanks, or any aircraft carriers (which conveniently weren't there that day).

Only three ships were permanently lost to the U.S. Navy in the attack. These were the battleships Arizona, Oklahoma, and the Utah - all of which were out-dated WWI era ships which F.D.Roosevelt had launched.

Nevertheless, plenty of material was salvaged from them, including the two aft main turrets from Arizona, and the Pacific fleet was back up and running in no time.

Then, the Americans doublecrossed Imperial Japan and completely destroyed them in a protracted naval and air battle in the Pacific.



With Japan pinned by a couple years of intense fighting, the Americans finally entered Europe:



Where they promptly lost the race for Berlin. Oops:



No matter. The Americans still had an Ace up their sleeve:



And with that big KABOOM, the American Military Commercial Empire effectively cornered the world market.


Death Toll 1770-1945 = incalculable.


After that, things started to get really interesting...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The short list
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 02:19 PM by T.Ruth2power
Timelines
US-Indonesia-East Timor (1965-2002) (9)

US-Vietnam (1947-2001) (23)

US-UK-Diego Garcia (1770-2004) (54)

US-Iraq 1980s (120)

US-Brazil (1961-2003) (8)

US-Bolivia (1951-2000) (7)

US-Ghana (1952-1966) (18)

US-Chile (1964-2005) (11)

US-Cuba (1959-2005) (22)

US-Cambodia (1955-1993) (12)

US-Venezuela (1948-2005) (60)

US-Laos (1958-1973) (3)

US-Guatemala (1901-2002) (14)

US-Congo (1959-1997) (17)

US-Haiti (1804-2005) (34)

US-Dominican Republic (1959-2005) (6)

US-UK-Guyana (1953-1992) (17)

US-El Salvador (1980-2002) (6)

US-Nicaragua (1979-) (19)

US-Panama (0)

US-Iran (1952-1953) (3)


http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=us_interventions_project
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Memories
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 06:41 PM by T.Ruth2power
Vietnam, 1950-73:
The slippery slope began with siding with ~ French, the former colonizers and collaborators with the Japanese, against Ho Chi Minh and his followers who had worked closely with the Allied war effort and admired all things American. Ho Chi Minh was, after all, some kind of Communist. He had written numerous letters to President Truman and the State Department asking for America's help in winning Vietnamese independence from the French and finding a peaceful solution for his country. All his entreaties were ignored. Ho Chi Minh modeled the new Vietnamese declaration of independence on the American, beginning it with "All men are created equal. They are endowed by their Creator with ..." But this would count for nothing in Washington. Ho Chi Minh was some kind of Communist.
Twenty-three years and more than a million dead, later, the United States withdrew its military forces from Vietnam. Most people say that the U.S. lost the war. But by destroying Vietnam to its core, and poisoning the earth and the gene pool for generations, Washington had achieved its main purpose: preventing what might have been the rise of a good development option for Asia. Ho Chi Minh was, after all, some kind of communist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. A fantastic post, up until the last fifth or so. "American-proxy Hitler?"
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 06:49 PM by Rhythm and Blue
:eyes:

I mean, seriously. It was a great read, and a wonderful condensation of our past along the lines of Zinn's People's History. Then you drop into tinfoil shit with Hitler being an "American proxy," and FDR ordering Pearl Harbor and then "double-crossing" the Japanese. Too bad. I mean, first it was wonderful, then it was batshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hey let me be the first
to admit that I'm not going to capture all the subtleties and profound realities of geopolitics in such a short picture laden post. Just want to get people to ask some questions beyond the college indoctrination of US history.

Thanks for your support. Cheers.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I understand where you were going with those, really.
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 06:56 PM by Rhythm and Blue
And I understand the ambivalence US industry had towards fascist leaders (especially the Japanese) before World War II; I've read a number of books and articles written in the '30s, so I understand. I really just think you hurt your message by phrasing things in such inflammatory and misleading language.

I mean, tacit American support for Japanese aggression is one thing. Japan being an American proxy is another. Japan was its own actor, though, and the US started to cut off the gravy train long before Japan showed any hostility towards America. Keep in mind that the Japanese objectives in the early stage of the Nippo-American theater was to break through Allied lines and secure oil resources due to the preexisting American embargo. Many Japanese strategists specifically stated in their diaries and in recovered transcripts that Pearl Harbor was an attempt to demoralize America into believing that victory was impossible. Their strategy was never to threaten America directly, it was to get America to sue for peace as soon as possible and the turn back to Asia, which they considered to be an internal affair.

The matter of Hitler is just a gross misrepresentation. Many amoral American businessmen did indeed work with Hitler, and made a fine profit off doing so. Many Americans found him to be sympathetic, and there was quite an anti-war movement for a while among anti-Semites. But that did not make Hitler a pawn or proxy of America by any stretch of the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah
I thought about pulling that one but went with it possibly to the detriment of the overall message which I hope folks will research.

Probably reading too much Blum lately and the lexicon becomes part of your language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Agreed
Arranged with Japan to bomb Pearl Harbor, but then double crossed them? No. At most, knew a Japanese attack was coming and let it happen (since attacking them at sea would make US the aggressor, no kiddin').

Otherwise thanks for the review, good pictures you've found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Come on, let's get a few responses to this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thanks for tryin'
I gotta head out for the evening.

Maybe some folks will take a look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Plutonium Foil Hat
My favorite: "The Japanese conveniently failed to hit the submarine base, the massive fuel storage tanks, or any aircraft carriers (which conveniently weren't there that day)."

FDR and Tojo got together to plan the whole thing. You Sir, already have a lobotomy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, it's too bad the way it made that turn near the end.
Everything in WW2 was just silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. A superb post
And then there were scores of covert wars removing democratically elected governments. Timely we're approaching the invasion of little Grenada - 24 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, what did you expect from wealthy slave/landowners?
Humility? Hey if the rest of the world does it, then it must be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Welcome to DU!
You have made quite an impression!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Arthur Silber deals with this subject in his 'Dominion Over the World' series
Very, very lengthy, eye opening, and depressing. http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2006/03/getting-out-of-trap-i-old-theme.html

Quoting here from Matthew Frye Jacobson:
The stakes are quite high for Americans' national self-conception. In expurgating the period of U.S. expansionism that bridges the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Americans adopt a broken narrative that casts Manifest Destiny and continental expansionism falsely adrift from "modern" U.S. history, and obscures the extent to which the modern state was built, and modern nationalism generated, in close relation to the imperialist project. The effect is to mystify U.S. involvement in global affairs by hiding the very moment when global power was so lustily seized. If there is no turn-of-the-century expansionism, then Manifest Destiny becomes an irrelevance of dim antiquity, and both the Wilsonian internationalism and the Cold War interventionism of the twentieth century can be imagined as developing upon an entirely different epistemological footing. Without the Philippines, in other words, it becomes easy to suppose a radical historical disjuncture separating the plains wars of the mid-nineteenth century and the Southeast Asian wars of the mid-twentieth: that U.S. soldiers referred to areas within Vietnam as "Indian Country" becomes a matter of simple metaphor, not of deeper ideology. But our first land war in Asia was fought not in 1950-53 but in 1899-1902, and it was waged largely by American officers who had received their practical training in campaigns against the "savages" of the Western plains in the 1870s.

This erasure has generally allowed a view that the United States has played its part as a power on the world scene only reluctantly. The triumph of American innocence, as Stuart Creighton Miller has called this willful revision, constitutes a pillar of twentieth-century American liberalism. Unabashed discussion of racial conquest has long faded from American political discourse; there is simply no longer a place in national self-conception for the rhetoric of "waste spaces" and of "unfitness for "self-government," or for the glorious war against "savages" that obtained in Theodore Roosevelt's day. And yet Americans still find themselves in possession of an empire marked by myriad alliances with pliant dictators, by an unbroken history of military interventions, by a twelve-digit defense budget, and by a global network of military bases--and so they have some explaining to do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is a strong early post.
I agree with others, above, that the early-to-mid 20th Century stuff sounded on the fringe. But overall, it sums up the tragedy of American imperialism very well.

Welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC