|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
FourScore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 07:20 PM Original message |
70 punished in accidental B-52 flight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wain (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. 70 usaf careers are over n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. Are any of those 70 generals or colonels? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usaftmo (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Yes, the Wing Commander at Minot AFB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. The word 'airmen' is a term for enlisted personnel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. depends on the context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 06:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. 4 officers punished including |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. This sounds worse and worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Not for an F troop operation like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Sure, but the order originated somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. "Fired" is civilianese |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. ''Informal'' system means off-the-books. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Bush* doesn't go by the books so why should anyone else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. THE INFORMAL SYSTEM WOULD NOT BE THOUGHT UP BY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enlightenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Enlisted personnel aren't idiots, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. I'll have some of what you're smoking, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
7. 70 scapegoats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Enny of them been the Commander in Chief?!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-19-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. 70?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
17. The cover up persists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFriendlyAnarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-20-07 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
20. But WHY did they need to be moved if the warheads were already removed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 14th 2024, 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC