Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If someone commits treason in a forest, is it still treason?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 04:47 PM
Original message
If someone commits treason in a forest, is it still treason?
"They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors."

(Link: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/1999/bush_speech_042699.html)

Video

Cheney seeks immunity in Plame lawsuit. Attorneys for Vice President Cheney, Karl Rove, Scooter Libby said “told a federal judge today they cannot be held liable for anything they disclosed to reporters about covert CIA officer Valerie Plame or her husband, former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.” Cheney’s attorney argued that the vice president is “legally akin to the president because of his unique government role, and has absolute immunity from any lawsuit.”


Posted here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The myth of the "Executive branch being above the law"
Since Cheney tells the President what to do, and since the President is above the law, than so is he...

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush unapologetic over CIA leak
Edited on Mon Oct-22-07 05:35 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, the VP has "absolute immunity from any lawsuit"...
...too bad Clinton didn't think of that in the Paula Jones case. Hmmm, I seem to remember a ruling 'way back then, let me see now... Oh, yes, it was this: the President has no intrinsic immunity from civil lawsuits, and anyway, the one in question was unlikely to interfere with his Presidential duties.

Isn't there a precedent in there somewhere? Oh right, I keep forgetting: precedents only matter when they can be used by Republicans.

Why more people are not outraged at this and other machinations by the rich and powerful, is a source of utter amazement to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's only treason WHEN the criminals-in-charge say it is. That's how it works.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC