Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stark should have taken the censure and auctioned it on eBay.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:42 AM
Original message
Stark should have taken the censure and auctioned it on eBay.
Because that's how much respect Congress deserves these days. He should have taken the censure, paraded it around to mock Congress and its "leaders" then got some bucks out of it.

Why did he apologize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pelosi probably cornered him and read him the riot act
I'm sure she probably threatened his membership on a committee, or that if he ever wanted any of his bills to see the light of day that he better play ball and apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'm thinking she might have had Luka Brazzi with her when she did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Where do they get all those horse's heads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is not right to say bad things about our god and his underlings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wasn't aware that he was cenured or that he apologized. Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wasn't aware of it either - here's what I've found thus far:
House fails to censure Stark, but he apologizes for Iraq remarks
By CHARLES BABINGTON Associated Press Writer
Article Last Updated: 10/23/2007 08:55:39 AM PDT

WASHINGTON—Republicans failed in an effort Tuesday to have the House censure Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., who said in a congressional speech last week that U.S. troops are being sent to Iraq "to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement."
Without debate, the House voted 196-173 to kill the proposal to censure Stark for "his despicable conduct." The vote was mostly along party lines, with all 168 Republicans on hand supporting the measure offered by Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. Five Democrats joined them.

Stark, 75, stirred cries of protest Thursday during a debate over President Bush's veto of a $35 billion increase to a children's health insurance program. "You don't have money to fund the war or children," Stark said on the House floor. "But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement."

Stark initially refused to apologize despite condemnations from GOP lawmakers and others. Moments after Tuesday's vote, however, he addressed the House to apologize to his colleagues, "to the president and his family," and to U.S. troops offended by his remarks.

"I hope that with this apology I will become as insignificant as I should be" in the continuing debates over Iraq and health care, he said. Boehner was among those who applauded.

Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Stark's remarks on Thursday were "inappropriate and distracted from the seriousness of the subject at hand."


http://www.montereyherald.com/state/ci_7257768
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for the info. while I'm of course disappointed that he apologized, I'm
Edited on Tue Oct-23-07 12:19 PM by John Q. Citizen
not surprised, given the timidity of the Dem leadership to discuss anything outside the realm of approved Kabuki dialog.

I did like his tag line though. "I hope that with this apology I will become as insignificant as I should be" in the continuing debates over Iraq and health care, he said.

I wonder who the 5 Dems who voted for censure were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I was first of all relieved to see it was an action on the R's part. Isn't that sad
that I just assumed the D's had come down on him?

Then I saw about the 5 D's. I'm guessing Lieberman for one? We'll no doubt find out. Jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why? He was shown the door of Room 101
And apparently, Nancy Pelosi took the role of O`Brien.

If you don't get the reference, might I suggest you read George Orwell's novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC