|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 09:54 PM Original message |
If Wellstone were still alive, do you think he could've been elected prez in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think he'd be running for re-election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angstlessk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. Honestly, no--too liberal. Feingold too. They were/are great in the Senate, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Actually, I preferred Paul, but I've always thought Russ had a better shot at the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Russ would have had a better shot, I agree. Neither of them could have made it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I agree..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-26-07 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
7. Wellstone was one of my heroes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perseid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. "was" and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. 'was' and 'no'....hmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-27-07 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
11. Sorry, but it is "were" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 16th 2024, 04:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC