Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Mukasey really in trouble?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:29 AM
Original message
Is Mukasey really in trouble?
Today's Must Read
By Paul Kiel - October 29, 2007, 9:58AM

The doubts, the concerns, the reasons for pause about attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey are coming fast and furious from senators left and right these days.

It's been a steep descent from the heady days when Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) preceded Mukasey's confirmation hearings by saying, "I like him."

The tone seemed to first shift from one of friendly disagreement to frank disappointment with the question by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI): is waterboarding unconstitutional? When Mukasey couldn't give a straight answer, Whitehouse pronounced himself "very disappointed."

Mukasey's dodge was transparent. Waterboarding was unconstitutional if it rose to the level of torture. And as an explanation for that "massive hedge," as Whitehouse called it, he professed not to know "what's involved in the technique."

Five days later, the Democrats on the committee signed a joint letter to Mukasey, making sure that he knew what's involved, and demanded an answer to the question as to whether waterboarding is torture.

Then two days later, the doubts grew louder. Two key Democrats, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT ) and Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) both said publicly that their votes depended on Mukasey's answer to the waterboarding question.

more...

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004580.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Sure Hope So
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. well, an attorney general who is pro-torture is what we just had in gonzales
will the democrats reinstate the torture policy of gonzo????

i pray not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. No he is not
He'll tell them what they need to hear, and that will be that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. If Mukasey isn't in trouble, he should be.
But no doubt the Dems will just challenge him a little to score points with their base (what little is left of it), and then they'll vote for him because they want to keep their powder dry for the really important things.

That plan worked well for Roberts and Alito, they've been able to...









...oh never mind, they haven't been able to do ANYTHING. They can't stop the war, they can't protect the Constitution, and they can't put a stop to the minority party criminals running rampant over our rights. Good job, Dems. That should keep you in power... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please...confirmation will be 78-20, with 2 abstentions
A joke, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. in the end he will be confirmed....
As for where all this doubting leads? Perhaps it's just a way of sending a message. Reports The New York Times: "Many Democratic lawmakers say privately that he is still likely to be confirmed, given the need for leadership in the Justice Department after months of turmoil."

Maybe that's the reason why only two senators have actually come out to actually oppose Mukasey's nomination: Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Chris Dodd (D-CT).

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think that I can responsibly talk about any technique here because ...
Well, it seems that raping the child daughter of a terrorism suspect is a "technique", so I can't really condemn it. However, I heartily condemn torture - whatever that may be.

I hope the dems have enough backbone to vote this clown down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh please he'll be confirmed 100-0...
...more sternly worded letters? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC