Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama surging to Dead Heat with Clinton in Iowa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:04 PM
Original message
Obama surging to Dead Heat with Clinton in Iowa
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 03:06 PM by Perky
In the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, meanwhile, a slip in John Edwards' numbers has allowed Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to tighten their grips on the No. 1 and No. 2 spots, respectively. Among all likely Democratic caucus-goers, Clinton leads with 28.9 percent, followed by Obama with 26.6 percent, Edwards with 20.0 percent, Bill Richardson with 7.2 percent and Joe Biden with 5.3 percent.

These results are from a random, statewide poll of likely caucus-goers in Iowa conducted Oct. 17 through 24. The Republican sample consists of 285 likely caucus-goers, with a margin of error of +/-5.8 percent. The Democratic likely caucus-goer sample consists of 306 likely caucus-goers, with a margin of error of +/-5.5 percent.

http://news-releases.uiowa.edu/2007/october/102907poll-candidates.html


2.3% difference with a 5.5 MOE and give the sample size is a dead heat. that is actually just 7 votes in a sample of 306

http://news-releases.uiowa.edu/2007/october/102907hawkeye-poll-powerpoint.pdf

The powerpoint highlights an Obama Surge at Edwards expense while Hillary has hit a ceiling.


NOw we know the REAL REASON she sent another 100 staffers to the state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. With the lock on the 'BIGOT" vote, he may just have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. posted this in another forum
"i just checked 6 major newspapers across iowa and there was one article from the chicago tribune in the quad cities news group. i don`t think the majority over there knows anything about this"

so is it really fair to call all the people in iowa who are going to vote for him in iowa bigots?






'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. she's smart
and doesn't take one vote for granted. That's how a smart campaign is run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think the fight for the nomination is anywhere over with
If Obama wins Iowa it may help him in NH, ect.

I think the "real reason" that Hillary sent 100 staffers to Iowa is that she feels she has a good shot at winning the state, not becuz of Obama necessarily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think it is Obama Per se. I think it is because she seems to have peaked
at 29%.


You are dead on however about Obama. If he sqeaks out a win. It will be huge. Black man wins in Lilly white Iowa. Even if he wins it will suck all the oxygen out of the room. allthey way to NH.

Hillary is way ahead there...but if the support for the also-rans move his way, it will tighten considerably. Leaving SOuth Carolin as the real test. If Obama wins in the Spouth and in Iowa. He will roll into SUper Tuesday with huge momentum. but if Hillary win NH and SC barely she problem locks it up.


On the Otherhand, if Hillary wins in Iowa by a slim Margin...she probably wins New Hampshire. and then SC is Obama's last stand.

Hillary needs to win Iowa's handedly or it becomse a two person race. That is why she is putting more troops into Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. IOWA vote for Edwards
Don't listen to the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC