Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ellison wants to ban photo ID as requirement for voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:52 AM
Original message
Ellison wants to ban photo ID as requirement for voting
Washington (AP) Requiring photo IDs to vote in federal elections would be banned under legislation introduced Wednesday by Rep Keith Ellison, who said such requirements disenfranchise minorities, the poor, women, elderly and young people.

"While photo IDs seem harmless they are in fact the modern day poll tax", Ellison D-MN said in a statement.

Ellison, who serves on the Judicatory Committee, got an important backer for the bill, as the panel's chairman, Michigan Democrat John Conyers, signed on as a co-sponsor.

(------)

Maybe this bill will pass and put to rest these ID's needed to vote. Which does indeed cause a lot of people to be unable to vote. My sister living in Indiana says it cuts down on illegal immigrants voting. I told her that was the most stupid republican statement she ever made. What illegal in their right mind would register to vote and take a chance of being sent back across the border. She didn't have an answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. When you register to vote your information is checked before you go on the rolls.
"The illegal-immigrants-voting straw man is far from the biggest problem at the ballot box. Blaming illegal immigrants, in fact, is a cynical ploy that ultimately would make it easier to keep Americans away from the polls -people like those in, say, Ohio, or in neighborhoods across the country where poor public transportation is as much an obstacle to getting an ID as it is to getting out the vote."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michele-wucker/the-illegals-voting-hoa_b_32158.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That was just the republican government in Indiana did to force
the ID they tried to scare the people there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. How would it work without IDs though?
What would prevent someone from simply going to a polling place claiming to be someone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's been working just fine without them for a couple hundred years
Every time I vote, they ask me where I live and then I have to sign the register stating that I'm me. (Which then becomes public record, btw.) In all the years I've been voting, no one has ever said, "Sorry, you've already been here today; see your signature on this line?"

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Who would do such a thing?
and why?

Most people who vote would intrinsically understand that duplicate voting names more than likely will be thrown out invalidating the time and effort they spent going to the voting location.

I mean the people affected by these bills more than likely are not anarchists or merry pranksters so what would be their motivation? Is being part of a voter irregularity investigation now a recreational activity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. It's a distraction from election fraud AND it enables vote shaving
of votes for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The poll workers check you off the list before and after you vote
When I go to the polls, I have to check in with with the poll workers, giving them my name and address. They check me off a list before they give me a ballot. When I am done and ready to submit my completed ballot, I have to do the same thing with a another set of poll workers with their own list. If anyone else tried to vote as me, it would be obvious because I would already be checked off the list. Besides, they would have to know my exact address and apt #. Otherwise, they wouldn't even get a ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly the current system works fine
Republicans don't want the poor or elderly voting. Its plain as day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Or...
we could give all citizens of the US some form of photo ID without the need for payment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Have you considered the logistics of such a system?
A new federal agency would have to be created just to crank out 300 million ID cards.

Where are these offices going to be located? The local post office and DMV seem to be pretty busy already.


Are they going to be required for anything else to justify their expense?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Official IDs are useful in many situations...
You need one to go through airport security, for work, to buy certain goods, and a whole host of other reasons. I think it's a very practical solution that would help many people. Couldn't it just be part of the social security system? I mean, that would be the most equivalent... Just make them photo social security cards or something... Obviously it's not a trivial task to do this, but I think we can handle it... after all, we did manage to fake a landing on the moon. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. point taken.
I just recall when I voted in '04 the place I went to seemed a bit more screwed up. Perhaps it was more organized than it appeared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. You sign by your name on roll, I've never had to show a photo ID to vote here in MN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FyurFly Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Photo ID should be required n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. They are not required in MN
As Ellison well knows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good GRIEF.. It's the 21st century, people..not the wild west frontier
Edited on Thu Nov-01-07 10:44 AM by SoCalDem
of the 1800's.. We need to get over this wild-west mentality and decide once and for all ....WTF DO we want?

Do we want to be anonymous zombies skulking around unknown..unseen..with wads of cash in our pockets..?? Might as well all don chadors, so no one will be able to see anything but our eyes.. or better yet, put some shades on those peepers, so NO ONE can tell who that big black blob schlepping down the street is..

But wait!! when a woman wants to get a drivers license picture WEARING one of those, we go ballistic about that too..


We expect to be able to vote and have legal, clean elections, with ONLY the people registered , voting....but "Don't wanna show any ID"..

People don't "know" each other like they used to in "Leave-it-to-Beaverworld".

ID..and by that I mean PICTURE ID is a necessary fact of life..and whining about it like a petulant 8 yr old will NOT change that fact.

The "gubbmint" already KNOWS who you are, where you were born, who your parents are, who your siblings are, where you live, where you work, where you went to school..and few people have reached adulthood without ever having some sort of credit in their name, so the banks know about you too.

The solution is so obvious it's downright painful..

Our country is twisting itself into a pretzel over the whole ID thing and all we need is for every citizen to get a damned passport..and for the people who cannot afford it, then they get theirs for free.. It's a whole lot cheaper in the long run that for all the stupid plans than are floating around now.

wanna vote? passport says you are a citizen
wanna travel outside the US..a no brainer
wanna prove you are entitled to work here? passport says you are a citizen..
wanna ever have a national health-care plan?? passport identified YOU as being eligible

We are wasting tons of money and time on something so easily solved and aren't we PROUD to be Americans:evilgrin:..why would we be reluctant to have a US Passport? People all over the world have died, trying to get here to GET a US passport .. ..and yet US citizens who are ENTITLED to have one, are flailing around like goofballs, screaming about how they don't want the gubbmint to know who they are :eyes:

If we can spend the money we are , on a stupid war, we could certainly hire enough people for the processing of passports for all of us... Hey..we made it to the moon once upon a time..surely we could manage to do this one thing that would put a stop to all the nonsense..

and if someone refuses to get a passport, then they can just skulk around the periphery of society while the rest of us vote, and travel and get jobs and someday, even use our national health care service (hey, I can dream)..

And regarding the bulky heavy unwiedy thing that IS the passport itself, the INFORMATION on the passport could surely be "Backed up" onto a plastic card we could carry in our wallets.. what a concept :)..It could even be coded with our driver information..and our school information..and any number of other things..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Passports will not resolve election fraud. We don't have a significant
voter fraud problem.

And btw, I've wanted a passport for two years but haven't been able to afford one. You buying? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. If people cannot afford it, they should not have to pay.
and I'm not talking about voter fraud..just the fact that citizenship is required, and for all the loonies who insist that "illeeeeegals are gonna vote", using a passport as the qualifying ID would shut them up once and for all..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. They're never going to shut up. They've learned that
whining and fearmongering works for them.

Maybe it'll stop working at some point. Yesterday on the floor of the House, Dreier sounded just like Charlie Brown's teacher. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. passports are not expensive, less than $100
if you don't have $100, you can't afford to travel anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. In MN we don't need photo IDs to vote, requiring so would be moving backwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. We don't need IDs to vote here in MN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. I was turned away from a local election in Michigan when I was 18...
... because someone had signed on my line at the entrance to the polling station. Wasn't me, but the workers told me I couldn't vote twice.

I have no problem with the photo ID requirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. So if you had whipped out your Photo ID, what would have changed?
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I don't know - at that point, it was too late to do anything.
Had they asked for photo ID BEFORE letting people in, though (as opposed to after it was too late), someone else would not have denied me my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. Senior citizens can have a difficult time getting ids
Several years ago my friend's dad had an awful time getting a passport because the court house where his birth certificate had been filed burned down long before anyone thought of putting the documents on a computer.

A couple years ago, because I was worried about someone deciding we would need id to vote, I dragged my mother in to get a state ID card (she hasn't had a driver's license in 20 years). She had to bring a copy of her birth marriage certificates. We had a very young clerk who was taken aback by both documents. Mom had a copy of her birth certificate that she'd picked up in 1942 - it was typed and totally threw the kid off. Then, he noticed that her marriage certificate didn't indicate what last name she would use. Fortunately, there was an older clerk there who came over, looked at the birth certificate and pointed out the county seal was on it so it was indeed good. Looked at the marriage certificate and said "It was 1946, they assumed the name would change." So, all the papers got stamped and Mom's picture was taken, but when she took out her checkbook to pay she was told they couldn't take a check without a photo id (which, of course, would take a couple weeks before the state mailed it out). Fortunately, they could take my check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 18th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC