|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:51 PM Original message |
Predictions only - who do you think the Democratic Ticket will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. gore / edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruiner4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. Gore/Colbert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. There will be no elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Great beard of Zeus I hope you're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Trust me I hope I am wrong too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
105. Great Odin's Raven I hope you're wrong too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
82. or at least not a legit election. more of the same bs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Al Federfer (214 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
86. You could be right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:53 PM Original message |
Hillary/_(insert lapdog name here)___ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
23. Doink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
4. Clinton/Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
95. I think Wesley Clark or Richardson will be Sec of State under Clinton...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
100. I second that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. As much as I hate to say it I think Hillary will be the nominee: Clinton/Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
114. That would be my prediction, as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Exxon/Verizon n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruiner4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Halliburton/OPEC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. They've already had their eight-year run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well, I really dunno yet. But assuming your ticket prevails, I'd have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thing about Bayh is he's eerily close to Lieberman on issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
64. Well, there are two things that keep his name in the air, really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. True - Gore was from the conservative end of the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. If he's not prochoice, no deal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #69 |
79. That's a parsable platform item. Really. Look at George H. W. Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #79 |
83. Well, I won't get too much into it here, but I think a strong argument can be made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #83 |
102. I understand and appreciate your point. Completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:32 PM Response to Reply #102 |
113. Thank you for your caring response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
76. Bayh is a conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
125. So is Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. Unfortunately, it will likely be the usual "not too liberal" candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. Clinton/Richardson! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No bashing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
14. Here's my predictions on '08 as it stands today: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Thing about Clark is - he saw what happened to his friend Kerry in 06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I think the opposite of you on Richardson--he folds like a card table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
70. I agree. Why oh why don't we remember that war hero Kerry was also an antiwar protestor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
116. The problem with your analysis is that Clark was never involved in anti-Vietnam war activities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Interesting -- but I don't think Bloomberg is going to run any more than . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Check out this thread/article on Bloomberg--Newsweek is giving him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I'd expect rumblings from Bloomberg (the iceberg breaking up perhaps) . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. He's starting to make peeps and rumblings: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
115. Be still my beating heart for your prediction! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. Clinton / Lieberman. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
123. Well, this is a dishonest post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. Edwards/Biden or Edwards/Dodd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. It's a pretty volatile situation, all right . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. i'm not so sure...last polls i saw from IA and NH looked far closer than the national #s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Could be -- it's going to be a long 8 weeks or so . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. Clinton/Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. LOL! Maybe in hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #34 |
47. It's what the media has already decided. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Well, I was just referring to the Lieberman part with the "hell" comment-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CANDO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
24. If it includes a Clinton, I'm not voting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. nope. not gonna flame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. I'll avoid the obvious opportunity to flame and just say this . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CANDO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
101. I wasn't a Nader voter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
127. I am far from sure that Gore or Edwards could blow 'Lican nominees away . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. SCOTUS. Only word to keep in mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #35 |
60. You beat me to it! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
26. Graft/Corruption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
33. At this early point, I have no clue, and therefore no prediction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regularguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
36. Clinton/ someone-with-a- southern-accent. Maybe Clark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
37. Edwards/Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
39. Clinton/Clarke/Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:17 AM Response to Reply #39 |
99. If you mean Richard Clarke, he is with Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
41. COLBERT / KRISTOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
42. Doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #42 |
93. brilliant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
43. Clinton / Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. I'm not sure I want Obama as VP either (don't want to see him wasted and languishing)-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Way-ell, if I were a betting man... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timber84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
45. Clinton/Bayh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #45 |
111. Makes sense.. Bayh is another DLC member! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
48. I have thoughts on three pairings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Biden said today he wouldn't do it--said VP would just be a ceremonial post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Wait a minute - what about Cheney ("just ceremonial")? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Right--it will revert back to a ceremonial post when the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
51. Gore/Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
52. Toss-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stewie (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
53. Clinton/Vilsack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
56. flvegan/Madonna |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #56 |
67. I would so vote for that ticket! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
57. I see Clinton/Richardson vs. Guiliani/Rice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Conservatives will sit that election out and the Dems will win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
59. Clinton/Clark! My choice would be Gore/Clinton or Gore/Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ishoutandscream2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 05:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Yes, Clinton/Clark. And I'm like you, wanting Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
62. Clinton/Mark Warner.........n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Mmmmmmm....I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
80. Isn't he running for Senate? Don't think he's in the running for VP any longer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #80 |
85. Yeah, he's running for Senate, and he's the most likely Dem. pickup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #85 |
103. Well, the name alone is a two-fer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #66 |
81. I don't think Hillary would pick one of the other presidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
68. Clinton/Easley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
71. Gore/Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
72. Hillary/Sebelius. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
73. Clinton/whoever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
74. Gore / Edwards...i hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
75. Doesn't matter. It will be whomever our corporate masters decree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. and the GOP will win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #75 |
92. yep. both nominees have to get the corporate thumbs up before they can even win nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-05-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
78. Gore/Somebody n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
84. Clinton/Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
87. Hillary/Hillary Sycophant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
88. gore/clark...and edwards will make a FINE attorney general. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
89. Edwards-Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #89 |
106. Me 2, Edwards/Obama (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
90. Edwards and someone from Midwest or West |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
91. Republicans will pick the Democrat, just like they did in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
94. Clinton/Edwards.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
96. Edwards/Webb OR Edwards/Obama would each be a winner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
97. Interesting! NO ONE lists Hillary as a possible VP candidate.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #97 |
107. That is interesting, I wonder what that means? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cadmium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #107 |
121. The Clintons are too powerful to be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
98. They Need To Be Fighters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #98 |
108. I agree, rabid fighting take no prisoners killing machines (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
104. Gore/Feingold or Gore/Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiphopnation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #104 |
119. i like your latter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
109. Clinton/Clark-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
110. Edwards/Kuchinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cadmium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
112. I would bet with conventional wisdom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cadmium (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #112 |
120. Just betting-not advocating n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
117. Biden/Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
118. Clinton / Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #118 |
122. Ya know, that is the one thing about Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #122 |
129. I'm not sure she would have a choice in the matter, in some strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
124. Edwards...Gore...Biden for VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemGa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
126. Clinton/Warner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
128. My vote won't count, so I'm not bothering to guess. -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
130. When I close my eyes I dream... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC