House Appropriations Committee Chairman Obey Won't Say Whether They'll Fund Bunker Busters For IranThe Bush administration recently sent Congress a request for $196 billion in "emergency" funding for Iraq and Afghanistan. Last week
ABC reported that it includes one line asking for $88 million to upgrade stealth bombers to carry the 30,000-pound "massive ordnance penetrator":
So where would the military use a stealth bomber armed with a 30,000-pound bomb like this? Defense analysts say the most likely target for this bomb would be Iran's flagship nuclear facility in Natanz, which is both heavily fortified and deeply buried.
"You'd use it on Natanz," said John Pike of GlobalSecurity.org. "And you'd use it on a stealth bomber because you want it to be a surprise. And you put in an emergency funding request because you want to bomb quickly."
Today David Obey, the Democratic Chairman of the Appropriations Committee, appeared at the National Press Club. You can see the footage
via C-Span.
At 42:10, Obey is asked whether he plans to fund the bunker busters. He speaks for over three minutes, beginning by saying "Our Iran policy has been spectacularly stupid for 50 years," and asks, "Wouldn't we have been better off if we left Mossadegh in place?" Yet he never answers the question.
When Obey finally winds down, at 45:30, the moderator asks again: "Will you fund the bunker busters?" Obey replies:
Well, I don't have the power to determine whether we will or will not do anything. I certainly think that the bunker busters raise very serious questions about what the Administration's intentions are and I'm very skeptical that we ought to proceed but that's going to have to be a collective decision.
What does this mean? Probably that he, Pelosi, etc. haven't even discussed this, and are hoping they won't be asked about it again. Obey most certainly has the power to stop it if he wants to badly enough. But given the behavior of the Democratic Congress to date, it seems unlikely they'll refuse to fund it. Some of them want to bomb Iran. And the ones who don't will be scared to cut the funding. If they do it and the bombing goes ahead anyway with non-Stealth bombers that got shot down, you can imagine the ensuing weeks-long cable TV screamfest.
(Thanks to
Just Foreign Policy for pointing this out.)
Posted by Jonathan Schwarz at November 5, 2007 06:26 PM
I'm hoping that maybe some DUers might want to know about this.
sw
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
