|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:05 PM Original message |
RECORDED VOTE TO MOVE TO COMMITTEE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Call Congress 1-800-828-0498, 1-800-862-5530, 1-800-833-6354 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pberq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Now we're talking! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. But *will* it be debated in the Judiciary Committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Repugs are voting AGAINST it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. Will somebody please explain to me what has happened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. After it was introduced, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Hoyer tried to table it.The Repubs think they have a winner in voting it down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. If passed, this vote will send the resolution to committee to die |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. it will send it to Conyers Committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Where it may not die |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Both parties are out of touch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. H Res 333 has already been sent there and Conyers has not acted on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. what happens when the House votes that he acts on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. The House didn't vote on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. He may not continue not acting on it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Now THIS is a mistake. They should have sat on it and let it get out to the news tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Time to turn the page on Bush and Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. I think we outmanuvered them in the end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Yep, the repukes wanted a quick debate and nay vote.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Yes, we showed we can keep up with them after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. Hmmm...I'm afraid it will go to committee and get lost in the shuffle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. We'll see. It can't die if we keep the pressure on. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I don't know. There are 5 strong supporters on that committee plus Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Of course the M$M can ignore it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. They can't ignore it unless they stop inviting Dem pundits on their shows. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. There's at least some of the Dem pundits that would keep their mouths shut about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. isn't this vote out of order? can a question of privilege of the House be moved to committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. ok now what the hell is this vote about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC