Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid To Vote Against Mukasey: Says He Was "Profoundly Disturbed" By Waterboarding Evasions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:29 PM
Original message
Reid To Vote Against Mukasey: Says He Was "Profoundly Disturbed" By Waterboarding Evasions
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/11/reid_to_vote_against_mukasey_says_he_was_profoundly_disturbed_by_waterboarding_evasions.php

Reid To Vote Against Mukasey: Says He Was "Profoundly Disturbed" By Waterboarding Evasions
By Greg Sargent - November 6, 2007, 2:37PM

In a statement sent our way moments ago, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just came out and opposed Mukasey's confirmation as AG. Key quote:

“I was profoundly disturbed by statements Judge Michael Mukasey made during his confirmation hearings concerning executive power, and about the legality of the use of waterboarding as an interrogation technique. As a result, I cannot in good conscience vote to approve his nomination to be Attorney General of the United States."

Reid's opposition, of course, won't stop Mukasey's confirmation. Reid had earlier refused to declare his opposition to Mukasey, claiming that he didn't want to get out front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which voted today to send the confirmation to a full Senate vote. Reid is holding a presser as we speak.

Meanwhile, Reid will have another chance ahead to prove his opposition to waterboarding. Congress is considering a bill that would explicitly ban this and other extreme interrogation techniques, and Reid can ensure that this bill comes to the floor for a vote.

More details on that here. Reid's full statement after the jump.

“I was profoundly disturbed by statements Judge Michael Mukasey made during his confirmation hearings concerning executive power, and about the legality of the use of waterboarding as an interrogation technique. As a result, I cannot in good conscience vote to approve his nomination to be Attorney General of the United States.

“I do not believe this is a difficult or complex legal question; waterboarding is illegal under current law. After World War II, the U.S. prosecuted and convicted Japanese soldiers for engaging in this practice. Senators McCain, Graham and Warner – who have served as leaders in the U.S. Senate on this issue, recently issued a detailed legal analysis unambiguously concluding that waterboarding ‘represents a clear violation of U.S. law,’ that Congress has repeatedly outlawed.

Further, former and sitting Judge Advocates Generals agree that waterboarding is illegal. On Friday, in a letter to the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, several prominent former Judge Advocate Generals declared unequivocally: ‘Waterboarding is inhumane, it is torture, and it is illegal… Waterboarding detainees amounts to illegal torture in all circumstances’ (emphasis theirs).

“I respect Judge Mukasey and believe he is an intelligent, capable man. If he is confirmed, I believe he will take steps to depoliticize the Department of Justice and to help restore the integrity and credibility that was so lacking under his predecessor, Attorney General Gonzales. However, given our recent history, it is of crucial importance that our next Attorney General be able to stand up to the President and for the rule of law. Because I am not confident that Judge Mukasey will, I will oppose his nomination.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. the 'proof of the pudding' so to speak is...
...if Reid actually IS against the nomination, AND he actively and forcibly twists arms to prevent it. I have my doubts, but also hopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We shall see, sooner rather than later, but I don't hold out much hope.
At least he did the right thing-now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wisconsin Larry Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Harry's going further - he's collecting signatures. Petition is at
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Thanks! Just started a new petition thread here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chicken shit
Now that Mukasey's locked in, Reid decides to oppose him?

BFD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's safe now...he can pander away to the base to try and score points with us
And many will fall for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe so. It's a token non-vote. Like all of them.
Just goes to show that they have plenty to vote Mukasey in, otherwise he wouldn't be posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. safe vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't he still have to achieve cloture?
Can't we find 40 dem senators to oppose cloture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC