|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:34 PM Original message |
MR. CONYERS, THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is really getting interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yes, it is!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yes! "Let the sunshine in, face it with a grin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Sunshine is the best disinfectant! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. And we certainly need to have a House cleaning and disinfection! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Man, I wouldn't want John Conyers dribbling MY Impeachment Ball!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. Conyers has already shot up on kool-aid. He won't do a fucking thing with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yup, Conyers said this would take far too much time from the other very important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I read that this is because Pelosi made Conyers promise to not go for impeachment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. She is not that powerful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Then why did he change his mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It was a loose game at that point....safe decision to move on as tomorrow is another day thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. But the people with him in january when he changed his mind said it was because of pelosi's threat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. The leadership in my opinion said patriots like Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. That's exactly what I'm saying. Conyers is a great man. He was threatened by Pelosi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Why would he roll for a priss puss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. What I read is that she made him agree to that in order to be chairman of the judiciary committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. sigh. yeah I knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. The Speaker of the House appoints Congressional Committee Heads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Well that promise was made to be broken now wasn't it?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. I'm sure he's in there. We are going to have to pressure him. He knows it is right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutineer (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Sounds about right to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. Link for claim that Pelosi threatened Conyers with loss of chairmanship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. don't have one. It isn't something I read today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I can guarantee that its a totally baseless claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. That is great news. If you know Conyers' closest aides well, please find out what he thinks now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. the answer is that he wishes it was otherwise but realizes that a sizable part of the caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. So you think he will not investigate then? That doesn't make sense. He wants those investigations as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I wouldn't be surprised to see more investigation, but divorced from DK's "impeachment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:16 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. No. What happened today was that the full house voted to send the impeachement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-07-07 12:23 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I understand. But in recent history, the House Judiciary doesn't start an impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Yes. But, he wasn't counting on the ball being put directly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. well he already investigated and published a book about it...g. bush vs the us constitution.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. He got a majority voting for it, not some folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I hear you, but it was a majority of the house... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. Delicious! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
22. It's time n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. Shine the spotlight on the criminal and his darkness! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
25. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-06-07 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
36. Is that a pun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC