Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No candidate earned more then 66% needed to win the DFA Presidential Endorsement.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:25 PM
Original message
No candidate earned more then 66% needed to win the DFA Presidential Endorsement.
DK won the straw poll. I don't remember this disclaimer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't remember that disclaimer either. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hmmmm is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. thanks. :) We could use some Rs too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm, that's odd, I don't remember that little caveat.
Seems like their setting the bar just a wee bit too high since no candidate is polling anywhere close to fifty percent right now.

I wonder what's up with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Time to point this out to the DK camp. ETA I remember them warning about
Edited on Tue Nov-06-07 11:31 PM by helderheid
perhaps having to endorse whomever was in the running if Gore won. No one then had 66%. This smells funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Something ain't right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. for those of you following this, please keep this kicked. I'd like to get to the bottom of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. thanks for the rec - sorry for all the self kicks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wednesday morning KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. Not many seem to give a shit about this but I'm pissed - I wrote DFA and the Kucinich camp. It's one
thing to expect the media to marginalize him but DFA? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That 66% requirement is pretty standard
Yes, DFA did a lousy job of pointing that out, but it isn't at all unusual. Most political groups that endorse have that rule. At least the ones I belong to have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well what was the point of the poll? NO ONE is polling that high.
Thanks though for the response. I may be making a mountain out of a mole hill but they did dare Gore to enter the race because they wouldn't be able to endorse him unannounced - he wasn't anywhere near 66%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. But in most endorsement polls, at least one candidate does poll that high
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Then why would they approach Gore? I don't get that. Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Did they approach Gore?
I am not arguing that they did not do this but just wondering - and sorry if I missed that. I didn't pay much attention to the fine print once I voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, they challenged him to enter the race because they couldn't endorse him unless he did and he
was at 30% or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Then, they put a second graph out
reflecting where the candidates would be should Al Gore not run, I lost interest in the poll at that point, I saw this as an attempt to snuff his momentum just as he was cracking 30%. Had they left poll alone as it was in the beginning with without alteration, I believe Al Gore would have garnered many more votes and some people wouldn't have went back to change their votes in order to manipulate the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. The point was to collect email addresses
Or at least, that is what I gathered when I voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I doubt it.
I am on the steering committee for two different DFA chapters. In order to get on most of their email lists, you have to go to DFA Link and sign up. They might send out other emails but we have been directed to tell our members to sign up at DFA link or they are not on the DFA email list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. This poll required an email. Maybe just to stop spamming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. "DFA Withholds Kucinich Endorsement" A Rant
and a good one at that... :grr:

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=4814

Dennis Kucinich won the Democrats For America straw poll with 44% of the vote, almost twice as much as the runner-up Obama. But DFA refused to endorse him.

::::::::

DFA announced that a candidate had to have at least 66% of the vote in order to get their endorsement.

With so many candidates, it was unlikely any one of them could get 66%, but if they held a new poll with only the two or three frontrunners, Dennis could get that 66% easily. So of course they won't do it.

Democrats For America is an oxymoron like Progressive Democrats. Nobody can call themself a Democrat these days and still have anyone believe that they are for America or that they are progressive.

That's why Congressional Democrats have only a 22% approval rating among Democratic voters.

Let's tell them that they'd have to have at least 66% in order to get our endorsement.

In order to poll that high, they'd have to put impeachment back on the table, stop funding the war, stop passing free trade agreements that cost Americans jobs, and start acting like Democrats. They may have forgotten how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Sorry, but that's not a good rant.
1. It's Democracy for America. Not Democrats for America.

2. Dennis got 31.97% Not 44%

3. Can't read the rest. "Diary Entry cannot be found"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Surprised that they wouldn't institute a run-off election......with the top
three vote getters. I know that progressive believe in the run-off system for regular elections...so it would seem to me that.....

Forget it. Guess politics is politics, period. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
22. An orgaization doesn't endorse a candidate who gets 32% of the vote
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 12:01 PM by book_worm
Yes, that was a good showing for DK, but that still means that 68% voted for somebody else, and with over half of their numbers voting for somebody else--you don't endorse a candidate. Most organizations, unions, ect would act that way. However, it's still a good showing and he should be pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Gore came in 2nd (even w/extra steps to write him in); HRC came in 5th, < 5% of votes
Just where is HRC's support hiding?

Certainly not among the internet-literate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. The 66% thing was there from the very beginning
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 12:25 PM by NoPasaran
Here's the test of the email from October 17:

Dear XXX,


With the first votes for the presidential nomination officially starting in less then 90 days, it's time for DFA members to make sure America knows where we stand.

Vote for your candidate right now and let your voice be heard!

http://www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/PulsePoll

Is there a consensus candidate that can get more then 66% of your vote and earn the DFA endorsement? Will Senator Obama beat Senator Edwards again by just a few percentage points? Will Senator Clinton pass up Congressman Kucinich and move into the top three? Will our members still vote to draft Al Gore even this late in the race?

Help us answer all these questions by getting out the vote for your candidate right now!

On November 6, exactly one year from Election Day, we will announce your winner and ask all of our members to join the winning campaign¹. Please vote today:

http://www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/PulsePoll

You already have access to videos recorded by five of the candidates created just for DFA members on Iraq and Global Warming². Over the next three weeks we'll hear directly from many of the campaigns again and Senators Edwards and Obama will kick it off with emails at the end of this week.

This is our final Primary Pulse Poll and the results will not be taken lightly. America wants to know who DFA members will support, because you are the boots on the ground that make change happen. We provide what others can't; Action, Community, Training, and Leadership all working to win in every district in every state. We're 600,000 members strong with a track record of electing over 540 progressives to office wince 2004.

When DFA members get active and speak out for a candidate, voters listen. Now, let's put our support behind the best candidate for president. Please vote right now.

http://www.DemocracyforAmerica.com/PulsePoll

Thank you for everything you do,

-Charles

Charles Chamberlain
Political Director

¹ DFA's commitment to the winner will be based on these guidelines: If one candidate receives more then 66% of the vote and at least 100,000 DFA members total vote in the poll, then the winner will get the DFA endorsement and at least one recruitment email to our membership. Fifty percent plus will win a recruitment email, but no endorsement. If no candidate gets 50%, then the winning candidate in each state will win a statewide announcement email.
² Over the last six months, we asked each of the candidates what they would do about Iraq and Global Warming. Five candidates created videos just for you and they are all posted for your review on the Pulse Poll voting page. If your favorite candidate hasn't submitted a video to DFA, please contact them and encourage them to submit one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Thanks
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC