Question: Would Cheney "out" Bush, during Impchmnt Hearings? And

if Cheney's testimony during those hearings perhaps, be enough damning info to bring Bush's impeachment directly on the heels of Cheneys?
If Cheney has to implicate Bush, could THAT then be legally used to set up impeachment for Bush?

Hope someone understands what I am asking. Brain seems on slo-mo tonite sorry. I've been thinking of cool and possible scenarios. Impeachment of BOTH of them needs to take place simultaneously, as in Kucinich's plan, so they cannot pardon each other when they are convicted of high crimes against the USA. (the way it SHOULD happen)

Can Cheney's testimony be used against george? Is that legal?
Can they weasel out of this, by again claiming 'exempt' due to executive privilege.

So many ideal scenarios & what-if's to ponder.
tks

That's why I think we should go for it. Cheney will be gone quickly, and then on to Bush.

I'm sure his"health" will be a sudden issue in this case.
However he gets out of the WH, I don't care. As long as he leaves.

and he would still have to testify, for a whole new set of impeachment hearings.(one can hope) Bush wouldn't pardon Cheney, with Cheney accepting a pardon would be an admission of guilt for a crime. He would still be obligated to testify...wouldnt he?

whether or not Cheney's testimony could also bring down Bush. I am hoping so..actually hauling Cheney's ass into a court hearing and expecting him to talk, may be a much bigger dream.

Maybe this dreaming falls under "thought crime". uh oh

...he and his supporters will use that as a get out of jail free card and will drop further prosecution.

The only way through this is extensive hearings that build a case on evidence not given by Dick Cheney himself.

Hekate

operation I guess. Bush/Cheney and the mofia.
That would be a far more interesting court hearing to watch than Clinton's stupid bj.

Maybe... :shrug: Isn't that the reason they have The Witness Protection Program ?... :popcorn: :kick:

if you turn states evidence we will cut you prison time.

What testimony?

Conviction only means removal from ofice, not a record, in a criminal sense.

stop criminal charges being brought after his removal from office. IMO they should present evidence that serious crimes were committed that would also guarantee triggering a criminal investigation leading to indictment and trial. There are enough Attorneys in the House and Senate that it shouldn't be a big problem doing that.

to anyone. No One snoops in his business. He's above surveillence & the law. Because of his coup on the US Govt. Cheny & his beloved Haliburton will live on, in some fashion, forever & ever. He has changed the world.
I did wonder, in the event of his answering to the JC, if what he says could be legally used to further our impeach, & convict agenda.
tks for the replies.

that I was responding to.

The OP obviously doesn't understand the impeachment process.

Also, no crime needs be proven to impeach, by that I mean the House doesn't have to prove a violation of a legal statute to impeach.

until after George II leaves office, I say do whatever can be done just to piss him off.