Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone else think that MAYBE those Republicans who voted against tabling impeachment, might be

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:39 AM
Original message
Does anyone else think that MAYBE those Republicans who voted against tabling impeachment, might be
Does anyone else think that MAYBE, just maybe, some of those Republicans who voted against tabling impeachment talk, might NOT have done it as a political stunt to embarass the Democrats?

The articles I've been reading imply that the only reason the Republicans did this is so that they can let the Dems make fools of themselves.

But is it possibile that's a cover, and some of the people in the Republican party are just as sick of Cheney and the damage he's doing to our country and their party as we are?

It seems they might have been playing with fire if their real sole intention was to embarass the Democrats. I don't think that's where we're headed. Wexler wants to escalate the discussion and give it a fair shake, which would surely bring a lot of issues to light that the Republicans would rather not see discussed on TV.

I have to wonder, if some of those Republicans voted against tabling the impeachment discussion, for reasons other than what the media is telling us. Maybe they want to let this thing procede, and they see there is a cancer in their party and they wouldn't mind seeing it removed. Saying it was a political stunt to embarrass the Dems would be a good political cover for their real motivations.

Wishful thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Trying to kill two birds with one stone?
I'm sure there are more than a few repubs who would like to see Cheney step down "for health reasons".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. No way
They have no integrity and agree with every single thing Cheney has done. Voting against tabling was nothing more than a stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, I have. You know it is a strange way to embarrass
you opponent's political party by denigrating one of the heads of your own party. The whole stunt didn't make Cheney look any better. In fact it made him look worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. it did nothing to cheney one way or another. he's already
widely unpopular. it was political gamesmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nope, it was done to make the Dems look bad:
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/republicans-keep-cheney-impeachment-bill-alive-2007-11-06.html

Republicans keep Cheney impeachment bill alive
By Jonathan E. Kaplan | Posted: 11/6/07 4:35 p.m.
November 06, 2007

House Republicans on Tuesday prevented Democratic leaders from blocking a resolution to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney.


The vote to table the privileged resolution, offered by Ohio Democrat Dennis Kucinch, began as a largely party-line vote to kill the measure, but Republicans developed a strategy to force Democrats to debate the resolution by supporting Kucinich. GOP leaders felt as though it was in their interest to debate the measure because it would make Democrats look bad.

After more than an hour of waiting for the vote to close, the motion to table the resolution failed by a vote of 162-251 after Democratic leaders failed to convince a group of liberal caucus members to side with them.

Republican lawmakers and aides credited Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) for coming up with the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. I realize that's what the media is telling us, however
Even if that is the intention - to make the Dems look bad - I don't really see the logic there. How does it make the dems look bad, if there ends up being an open investigation into high crimes of the Vice President. Even if he doesn't get impeached, the investigation will not help the Republican Party.

if it was a political move, I think it was dumb and it could backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. No, per that article, that's what the rethugs said.
"Republican lawmakers and aides credited Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) for coming up with the idea."


I do think it backfired because now there will hopefully be a hearing on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. right, that's my point
media... republican party... all the same thing. doesn't mean that was their true motivation.

either way I think it was stupid. voting is not supposed to be for silly political games. if it backfires they deserve it. I hope it backfires in their face and this Shandegg dude will be the one looking like a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not a chance in hell.
That would require decency, which we all know, is lacking in the dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. no. not just hell no or fuck no, either.
I suggest you take a look at the list of repukes who voted against tabling. the most criminal complicit bush boosters of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well, whether the investigation is revealing or not, they're basically covered.
On the one hand, they can assert their vote was merely to embarass the Democrats.

BUT, if the investigation goes forward and all hell breaks loose, they can assert what you said,...that, they wanted to get the "cancer" out of their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Boils down to that
If they actually vote to impeach Cheney it might still boil down to that but I won't hold my breath with that crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'd like to believe it, but the Republican legislative history doesn't support it.
They always vote as a monolythic block. This vote was no different...their first inclination was to squash it. Someone from on high obviously thought it might be good PR to allow it to proceed, so they rushed back and started to change their vote.

I don't expect Republicans to do the right thing on this issue, but I do wonder why our Democratic leadership are equally loathe to debate these articles of impeachment in Congress. I suspect that there is an unspoken fear that this administration will do something nuts, like nuke Iran or take some other equally reckless unilateral action in response. Since I believe they have committed capital crimes, their actions to avoid accountability could be extreme in the hopes of jump starting the civil conditions necessary to declare martial law. Hope I'm being paranoid, but I cannot fathom any other reason why Democrats are unwilling to do their Constitutional duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. If the GOP is trying to distance themselves from the Bush Admin
for elections, at least, one of the grandest gestures they could make is to move the debate forward - so everybody facing an election year can go on record saying "I'm NOT with Mr. 19%" When the vote stops the process they can easily put it back on the Dem majority. And the establishment Dems fighting this all the sudden look like they're okay with Cheney. Now Dems in congress own just as much of the Bush problem as their GOP counterparts.

Just like they own Iraq, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. For that to be possible, they all had a "Come to Jesus" moment
at the same time seeing as they didn't begin by voting against tabling, they started CHANGING their vote, originally for tabling, in the middle of the vote.

So, ummmmm, I would say NO chance in hell they were doing anything other than screwing with the Democrats AND the American public as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. no. it was a stunt. remember how the very first vote to table went
it was overwhelmingly being voted against. it was not until the first vote was completed that rebugs started switching votes from tabling to debating.

they switched their votes on orders from the leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. They're attempting to cover all bases here.
If this investigation reveals all of the criminal wrongdoing that we all know is there, the GOP will say "See, we supported this all along..." If Cheny is indeed impeached, another win for those who supported this. If the cronies in the Judiciary let Cheny walk, you'll see a shit-storm thrown at the Dem's like we've never seen before. I must admit that this was a clever move on the part of the GOP. They've covered their asses real good. They must either be really afraid that the investigation will result in impeachment, (good for us all), so they've scampered to be on the side that's going to look good, or they know Cheny will get out of jail free card this whole fucking thing, (most likely). They would beat that to death in 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. me being optimistic and all I have to agree with you it is a very good possibility
after all the critters would like to keep their seats I would bet. By doing nothing it really looks bad on the repukes more so than the democrats imo

dennis started the ball rolling the other day and it won't be stopped and it'll only move slow at the beginning. I watched nixon's fall and I'll see bushco's* fall as sure as I'm setting here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's possible, if they're running for re-election, too
Cheney's got an 11% approval rating. To whom will they be pandering by helping to prop the criminal up? Maybe they're sick of being blackmailed into voting for every stupid POS proposal he crams down their throats. This gives them cover when they go back to face their constituents.

It's possible. Anything is possible at this point. Even a Democrat growing a spine, though while possible, is still pretty unlikely.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. This wildly ridiculous thought
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 12:29 PM by Mme. Defarge
has entered my head as well. Cheney is universally loathed and is a millstone around their political necks. Why WOULDN'T they want him thrown off the bus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. I woudnt be surprized if a few pugs
facing the election cycle were not trying to run away from Cheney/Bush, particularly when given cover by this 'clever attack'.

See what they say about it in 6 mos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. I fully agree - it's wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. You mean the ones who first voted for tabling the talk, and then, seeing
it as a "losing" resolution, changed their votes to FOR tabling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm sure someone else thinks it. But that doesn't mean its right.
Yes, you are engaged in total wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Whatever the reason, the right outcome was reached.
This country deserves better than our congress continaully covering up for crmiminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. Come on. These Republicans are bathroom sniffers and have diaper fetishes
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 02:16 PM by NNN0LHI
The RNC knows this and has something on each and every one of these freaks. That is the only reason they are there to begin with.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC