|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:39 AM Original message |
Does anyone else think that MAYBE those Republicans who voted against tabling impeachment, might be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
1. I doubt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
2. Trying to kill two birds with one stone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. No way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yeah, I have. You know it is a strange way to embarrass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. it did nothing to cheney one way or another. he's already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. Nope, it was done to make the Dems look bad: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. I realize that's what the media is telling us, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No, per that article, that's what the rethugs said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. right, that's my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
6. Not a chance in hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. no. not just hell no or fuck no, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
9. NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
10. Well, whether the investigation is revealing or not, they're basically covered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Boils down to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
11. I'd like to believe it, but the Republican legislative history doesn't support it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
14. If the GOP is trying to distance themselves from the Bush Admin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. For that to be possible, they all had a "Come to Jesus" moment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. no. it was a stunt. remember how the very first vote to table went |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnviroBat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
18. They're attempting to cover all bases here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. me being optimistic and all I have to agree with you it is a very good possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
20. It's possible, if they're running for re-election, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. This wildly ridiculous thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. I woudnt be surprized if a few pugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
23. I fully agree - it's wishful thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
24. You mean the ones who first voted for tabling the talk, and then, seeing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
26. I'm sure someone else thinks it. But that doesn't mean its right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
27. Whatever the reason, the right outcome was reached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
28. Come on. These Republicans are bathroom sniffers and have diaper fetishes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC