Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hagel criticizes Bush administration on Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 07:33 PM
Original message
Hagel criticizes Bush administration on Iran
Hagel criticizes Bush administration on Iran

Sen. Chuck Hagel

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Sen. Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican, lambasted President Bush's foreign policy on Iran and the Middle East in a speech sponsored by a Washington think-tank Thursday.

"I do not see how the collective actions that we are now taking will produce the results that we seek on Iran's nuclear program, in Iraq, on the Israel-Palestine issue, or on any issue," he said.

He added that he believes the United States should engage countries like Iran immediately, much like has been attempted with North Korea, because "each day becomes more and more dangerous."

"Now is the time for the United States to actively pursue an offer of direct, unconditional, and comprehensive talks with Iran. We cannot afford to refuse to consider this strategic choice any longer. We should make clear that everything is on the table, our issues and Iran's issues," he said.

Before the audience of academics and reporters gathered by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Hagel also accused the administration of using strong-arm tactics as diplomacy.

"Loose talk of World War III, intimidation, threats, bellicose speeches only heighten the dangers we face in the world. Without offering solutions and building international alliances we only strengthen the hand of those who prey upon and play to a confused, frightened and disorganized world."

more...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/08/hagel-criticizes-bush-administration-on-iran/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Links
to audio, video and text http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_events/task,view/id,1424/

A few more quotes that I think are worth mentioning

All too often, we mistakenly try to compartmentalize and isolate events and issues, and do not stop to consider how a series of events are interconnected and impact the world. No nation can affect these events acting alone. Unless nations work to shape, influence and guide the course of global events, events will shape themselves…and the world, leading to an ever more dangerous planet.


Last week I received an e-mail from a friend who is an Australian Vietnam veteran regarding the U.S. and Iran. He wrote, “Fear, I see it in your debates on immigration, trade, Iran and now even your economy. Since when has your great nation and people been afraid? You, like Aussies, have always had a ‘fair crack’ at things, and a ‘fair go for everyone.’ Where is America’s clear voice of sanity? Why are you so afraid to talk to Iran?”

America must not allow itself to become paralyzed by a fear that erodes our self confidence and trust in our Constitution and each other.


None of us –in public office today—the Administration, Congress, our Presidential candidates – are fulfilling the requirements of leadership at a crossroads time in history…nor are we absorbing the enormity of the time in which we are living. Neither Republican nor Democratic candidates are speaking to the great challenges of our time…in particular Iran…with depth, strategic thinking and wise words. We are captive to the lowest common denominator of “who can talk the toughest” and who is the “meanest cowboy on the block.” That kind of rhetoric…political as it may be…will only drive the world further away from America and deepen a world crisis…that we may not be able to recover from. At times, the debate is astoundingly uninformed. Before it is over, the American people will be subjected to nearly two years of a media circus surrounding our presidential election where the candidates are reduced to verbal ping pong volleys on the great issues of the day.

Rather than acting like a nation riddled with the insecurities of a schoolyard bully, we ought to carry ourselves with the confidence that should come from the dignity of our heritage…from the experience of our history…and from the strength of our humanity…not from the power of our military.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes and then he votes in lockstep with Republicans on all matters.
When one knows better and states outright the better way and yet votes differently from his words what should we think of that person...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. No, he does not
He is a conservative on social and economic issues, but even on such issues he does not always vote the way the administration wants, an example being the Medicare drug bill. He has consistently voted with the dems on Iraq all this year, and was the initiator or one of the main cosponsors of several related bills and amendments. He is one of two republicans (Lugar being the other) that has voted against the Kyl-Lieberman Iran resolution, that so many democrats including Clinton voted for. On foreign policy issues he is one of the best in the Senate, in terms of vision and overall understanding of the issues. Hate him or love him or even better take him as he is, but be fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. the collective actionss we are now taking will take us to was, as the administration wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder what Hagel's game is
I would like to think he is just a concerned citizen advocating a sane foreign policy, a policy very similar to the D candidates.

But that R behind his name will always lead to doubts as to motive.

If Sen. Hagel wants credibility, it is time for him to leave the corrupt and treasonous Republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Who knows...
It seems pretty sure though that his opinion of the current state of the republican party does not seem to be much better than yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC