Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Violates Chemical Weapons Convention In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:04 AM
Original message
U.S. Violates Chemical Weapons Convention In Iraq
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/28563

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/US_violates_chemical_weapons_convention
US violates chemical weapons convention

From Wikileaks
Jump to: navigation, search
2007-11-08 (Thursday)

“The use of chemical weapons by US forces was explicitly banned by President Gerald Ford in 1975 after CS gas had been repeatedly used in Vietnam to smoke out enemy soldiers and then kill them as they ran away. Britain would be in a particularly sensitive position if the US used the weapons as it drafted the convention and is still seen internationally as its most important guardian.

The (UK) Foreign Office (Minister of State, Mike O'Brien) said: "All state parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention have undertaken not to use any toxic chemical or its precursor, including riot-control agents. This applies in any armed conflict."

— US Prepares to Use Toxic Gases in Iraq, The Independent (London), March 2, 2003




The M33A1 bulk CS chemical dispenser, 21 of which appear together with their M254 high pressure loading kits in the leaked U.S weapons list for Iraq

Wikileaks exclusive investigative report by
JULIAN ASSANGE (ja@iq.org)

The United States has been caught with at least 2,386 chemical weapons deployed in Iraq. The items appear in a spectacular 2,000 page leak of nearly one million items of US military equipment deployed in Iraq given to the government transparency group Wikileaks. The items are labeled under the military's own NATO supply classification Chemical weapons and equipment.

In the weeks prior to the March 19, 2003 commencement of the Iraq war, the United States received a widely reported rebuke from its primary coalition partner, the United Kingdom, over statements by then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld that the US military might use CS gas in Iraq and Afghanistan. Subsequently Washington has been quiet about whether it has deployed CS gas and other chemical weapons or not, except to deny, then admit, to using white phosphorus, as "an incendiary" during a gruesome 2004 assault on Fallujah — a use not covered by the Chemical Weapons Convention.

The use of chemical weapons such as CS gas for military operations is illegal. The Chemical Weapons Convention of 1997, drafted by the United Kingdom and ratified by the United States, declares “Each State Party undertakes not to use riot control agents as a method of warfare”. Permissible uses are restricted to "law enforcement including domestic riot control."

Riot control agents, according to former Clinton Administration National Security Council analyst Elisa D. Harris, speaking to the New York Times, are cited explicitly because they have a history of escalating misuse leading into uncontrolled chemical warfare. They given special treatment under the convention in a number of ways. They are uniquely and explicitly:

defined (Art. II.7),
prohibited for use as a method of warfare (Art. I.5),
required to be declared (Art. III.1(e)),
cited in Art. X.8(b) on investigation and assistance if used against a State Party, and
permitted for a purpose not prohibited by the Convention, namely, “law enforcement including domestic riot control purposes” (Art. II.9(d))

Most items on the Chemical weapons and equipment list were registered via the US Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, 5183 Blackhawk Rd, Gunpowder, Maryland.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. How many smoking guns does it take to convict our war criminals under the law? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is there some war-crimes RECORD they're trying to break? K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. What's Another Broken Treaty Between Friends?
Do we even have any friends left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progpen Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. We ARE world law.
Just ask AWOL or anyone in the Rapture Ready Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Forget impeachment
these are war crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rec'd with total, ongoing disgust. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. I remember when a blogger pointed this out during the destruction
of Fallujuh. It was known then.

They've not only poisoned Iraq but also the bodies of our troops. There will be hell to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dear Congress
Either we rein this rogue administration in, or the World Court does. What's it going to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I say give the World a pop at them
Our government needs a serious cleaning out and the Dems aren't up to it. Likely because any number of them are up to their eyeballs in muck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC