Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, when the Dems support something they need 60 votes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:21 AM
Original message
So, when the Dems support something they need 60 votes.
But when the Republicans support something (like Mukasey) they only need 51 votes.
I think this needs to be pointed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ask Harry Reid. And Ben Nelson--supposedly he was the one who brokered
the Mukasey confirmation (that old gang-of-fourteener!). Gotta love my Senator, old Helmet-Head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's why after my Mom is gone, then so am I. But not in the
same way, obviously.

We don't think she's going to be around much longer so just as soon as the dreadful event happens, I plan to pack all my shit and head up to Oregon.

They call this place the 'Heartland'. I beg to differ. It's more like the asshole of the Universe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I really don't understand.
You're moving from Nebraska to Oregon because the Dems don't have a filibuster proof majority in the Senate? But only after your mom's demise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Apparently you don't understand. We don't have a democratic
party in Nebraska. And Ben Nelson bragged during his re-election about how often he supported bush** in all his crimes.

Nebraska is on a level all its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You are correct. I thought Kansas was a shit storm, but that sounds really bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sorry to hear your mom's doing worse, acmavm--
Hope you're holding up OK. Sometimes having a dream to look forward to can really help get you through some dark times--Oregon does sound good. Mountains, ocean...an actual viable Democratic party...yep. I'm headed for the mountains (Colorado) next myself, when this Offutt tour is up. BTW, did you hear that Mike Fahey isn't going to run? I thought I heard that on KFAB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I'm fine. But she sure can't get around anymore. And she's in
constant pain because she needed hip replacement surgery (on both sides) but they said no because she couldn't survive it.

Colorado? Isn't Colorado a pretty mixed up place itself? I know Denver is pretty 'liberal' but I have two daughters who live down there and they say they're surrounded by bush** supporting idiots. And they live in Denver.

Fahey isn't running for Hagel's seat? He must think that the taxpayers of the City of Omaha have more money left that he can fleece them out of. (I know, I know, ended the sentence with a preposition.) I surely hope that downtown ballpark shit fails. That's just one of many of Fahey's idiot ideas that I wish he'd shove where the sun never shines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Poor lady. Hope your mom can be made comfortable.
We'd be going to CO Springs, which is even worse than Nebraskee, but I'm hoping the landscape makes up for the Republican Fundie asshattery. I could be wrong...and I'm pretty sure I heard that Fahey won't run for Hagel's seat, because he's got oh-so-much left to do as mayor (yep, including your ballpark, LOL!). That leaves us with Scott Kleeb, I guess--it's like David going up against Goliath without a slingshot--if he even runs at all. It's going to be a grim campaign year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Would you prefer having another Chuck Hagel instead?
Or perhaps you'd rather have a Coburn or Brownback clone?

Because those are your alternatives in Nebraska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Actually, if Chuck wanted to stay in the Senate, I'd be OK with that--
I like him better than Nelson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. We do not have an opposition party. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Sorry to jump in here...
...but we do have an opposition party, it's the Republic party. The Democratic Party is the majority party, so they no longer need to be an opposition party.

Well, except for the part that now, having gone from being a totally ineffective opposition party, they have now become a totally ineffective majority party. While the Republics are a very effective opposition party, in spite of the numerous scandals that include sex, corruption and criminal malfeasance in office.

Me, I'm still trying to figure out how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Let me explain. We have a Duopoly. There is no opposition party.
The party in power is the Corporate Kleptocracy and War Party. There is no organized opposition party in Congress to CK&WP. It explains most of what has transpired over the last 30 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Whenever the Dems want to ram something down the GOP's throats, they need 60 votes.
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 10:39 AM by Buzz Clik
And that's just to gain cloture in the Senate. We need 2/3 to override the veto.

It ain't easy in a highly partisan atmosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Way to completely get this specific situation backwards.
In the case of the Mukasey nomination all it took was 41 votes against cloture. There was no filibuster. There is no opposition party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Damn. You scrolled all the way down from the OP to find this ditty?
It's certainly possible for the majority party to filibuster itself, but that would simply put even a hotter spotlight on the Senate Democrats' impotence.

This case was a done deal the second it happened. Keep in mind who suggest Mukasey to Bush in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The majority party is the Corporate Kleptocracy and War Party.
Yes I would have preferred that the people's representatives stood up against torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. torture and wire tapping and the war and tax cuts and and and and .....
and they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. If you absolutely must reduce something incredibly complicated into one line, sure.
However, it's far more complex than that, and you're doing everyone a disservice by pulling a Bush and watering it down to the point of irrelevance just to score a political point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Senate procedure says
Any item brought to the vote can be protested if they get 60 votes to hold it back, I think it is called colture....

Then it couldn't be brought to the floor for an up and down vote.

If they get an up and down vote a majority rules.

I didn't check as to the filbuster. But I think you can block the cloture if you filbuster or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I wondered why there was no filibuster..
but I haven't been through all of the threads yet..:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Other way around: 41 votes against cloture blocks a vote on the procedure.
A vote can be blocked if 60 votes for cloture cannot be found. Thus 41 votes against cloture are enough to kill a nomination or a bill. Filibusters, in the 'Mr. Smith Goes to Washington' sense, never happen anymore, as the rules allow for killing a bill by simply failing on a cloture vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. Our Dems seem to have about as much power, in the majority, as they did in the minority...
Which is to say, not very much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC