Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers, Nadler Request Torture Memos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:38 PM
Original message
Conyers, Nadler Request Torture Memos
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=929

Conyers, Nadler Request Torture Memos
November 9th, 2007 by Jesse Lee

Today Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers and Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Subcommittee Chairman Jerrold Nadler sent a letter to newly confirmed Attorney General Michael Mukasey restating their October 4 request to receive copies of Justice Department “secret” legal opinions authorizing the use of torture on terror suspects. On Thursday, Rep. Nadler’s subcommittee held a hearing about the cruel and inhuman nature of torture and extreme interrogation practices during which “waterboarding,” a controversial tactic believed to be authorized in these memos, was described in detail by former U.S. Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) instructor Malcolm Nance and other witnesses.

Full text of the letter:

November 9, 2007

The Honorable Michael Mukasey
Attorney General of the United States
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530

Dear Mr. Attorney General:

As you begin your important duties as our nation’s Attorney General, we write to follow up on our October 4, 2007, letter to your predecessor requesting two 2005 Department of Justice secret legal opinions authorizing the use of “painful physical and psychological tactics” on terrorism suspects that were first exposed in the October 4th New York Times story “Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations.” Since that October 4th letter, both the government’s own November 5, 2007, pleading in ACLU v. Department of Defense and media reports have revealed that, despite initial reports referring to two legal opinions, the Department actually issued three secret legal opinions on this subject in May 2005.

As we noted in our earlier letter, both the alleged content of these opinions and the fact that they have been kept secret from Congress are extremely disturbing. Committee staff has spoken with Department and White House staff about our October 4 request, but no specific response to that request has yet been received. In light of these new developments, we request that you promptly confirm the existence and dates of the three secret legal opinions, as already stated in court papers filed by the Department, and that there are no other secret legal opinions on this subject. We also ask that you seek to expedite the production of all three of these opinions to the Committee. As yesterday’s Judiciary Subcommittee hearing demonstrated, the issue of torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading interrogation remains a serious concern of the Committee and the American people, and it is crucial that the Committee be fully informed of the facts as it continues to consider this troubling issue.

Please direct responses and any questions to the staff at the House Judiciary Committee, 2138 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (tel: 202-225-3951; fax 202-225-7680). Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

John Conyers, Jr.
Chairman

Jerrold Nadler
Chairman, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Right and Civil Liberties

cc: Hon. Lamar S. Smith
Hon. Trent Franks
Hon. Brian Benczkowski
William Burck, Esq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know, I'm kinda past the "request" stage
I feel more like being in the "stand-on-his-chest-and-demand" or "pin him-to-the-ground-over-a-fire-ant-hill-and-ask" stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know what you mean, but Mukasey's just getting sworn in today.
I think this is pretty good; they were so hot to hire an AG, let him get to work. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. True enough
Now we'll get a chance to see how "answerable" the new AG is, because Sen. Schumer said he would be. And if you can't take the word of a sucker like Charlie, who can you trust?

I'm sure that Sen. Schumer will be right on top of this so that his self-serving, creepy little op-ed in the New York Times in support of Mukasey doesn't look like so much unmitigated ass-covering bullshit.

Yeah. I'm real sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. there are hundreds of 'rendered' people willing to testify
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. And once AGAIN, I predict, that the following will happen... AGAIN...
The White House will supply them with thousands of pages of information that is already in the public domain-- mostly press clippings from the mainstream media.

And I also predict...

AGAIN...

That Democrats will be outraged, shocked and SURPRISED...

AGAIN!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But we have a new AG!!1!
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. So fitting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. The new AG's response....
to copy and paste previous responses to this request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another letter!!!!
Boy, this will really have * shaking in his boots. As if he cares what congress does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And if they do NOT cooperate, we will be forced to get...
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 04:16 PM by IanDB1
THE COMFY CHAIR!!!

Biggles! Put her in the Comfy Chair!



Oh, no! Not The Comfy Chair!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. now get to work mr mukasey and supply these gentlemen with their requests
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 11:27 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC