Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't give a damn about 2008 and who is elected if bush & Cheney walk free.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:30 PM
Original message
I don't give a damn about 2008 and who is elected if bush & Cheney walk free.
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 09:33 PM by Botany
What part of "the rule of law" does Pelosi, Hoyer, Wasserman Schultz, Schummer,
Reid, Rockefeller, Wasserman Schultz, Dianne Feinstein, and others not get?

They lied us into a war, stole 2 elections, committed treason w/ Plame's outing,
spied on us, let bin Laden walk, allowed the Taliban to regain power, and suppport
killing the supportive capacity of the earth for a buck and you want to make nice
w/ them?

No President and Vice President have deserved impeachment more than bush &
Cheney and yet all I hear is empty excuses about timing and the people's business.
Wanna help stop the war? How about going after the man behind starting it?
Dick Cheney ..... his WHIG White House Iraq Group and his Office of Special Plans
in the Pentagon helped sell the lie we need to invade Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Draw up your plan and send it off to Pelosi
Tell her how she's going to get enough support in the House to start Impeachment hearings, hold those hearings, bring Articles of Impeachment (Kucinich's will do), get those passed, have a trial in the Senate, (presided over by John Roberts, BTW) and convince 67 Senators to vote to convict. Repeat the process for President Bush.

In 14 months. During an election year, when all 435 Representatives are campaigning for their jobs. Remember the Blue Dogs come from very conservative parts of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There you go again, Richardo...injecting some common sense...
which is why I like reading your posts.

Your analysis is spot-on. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Make the Republicans defend the indefensible
Lying to start a war is 100% toxic ... use it.

And it does not matter what part of the country one comes from ...
Iraq was and is wrong and so was letting bin Laden walk.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. They've been defending the indefensible for six goddam years
I don't see the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. She already has enough support
Start the hearings in committee, its not rocket science. As the evidence becomes public, members of Congress will have no choice but to follow up. The public will likely demand it.

If you watched the House vote on Kucinich's impeachment resolution closely the other day, you would have noticed that prior to the Republicans sudden swing to vote against tabling it, there was signficant bipartisan support for continuing the debate.

Methinks that's why the GOP suddenly changed course, not to lay a trap for Dems as they claimed, but to hide the fact that a growing number of members were changing their mind.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Interesting point - I was not able to watch the vote...
Those dynamics on the GOP side make sense.

I still think it's too late in the game for impeachment. I'd rather have the investigations and prosecute them criminally when they are out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Blue dogs are above the constitution?
If I am to remain a democrat, something has to happen before the election or some remedy forthcoming after or its my last in that designation. But I intend to be a democrat through this election so that I can try one more time to get progressives or traditional democrats elected. No republican can be allowed to take office as POTUS under present conditions. After that all bets are off. I'll be a progressive independent. I'm being honest and I've worked for this party many many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. If the Blue Dogs go, they will be replaced by Republicans, not progressives
They some from traditional GOP strongholds and it's a freaking miracle their constituents voted Dem at all in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. I'm not a proponent of the idea democrats are voted in
according to how repubican their opinion and outlook is. If that were true, there would be no reason for their republican opponent not to win (they would go with the genuine article). I think people were looking for change when they voted the democrats in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. I think people voted the Blue Dogs as a reaction against the radicalization of the GOP
They still want conservative, just a more responsible conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I imagine Nixon would have loved to have people of your opinion in his time (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. The vote to start impeachment hearings against Nixon was 410 to 4.
And even with that overwhelming vote, it took from February until May to get the hearings started. There's three of your 14 months right there.

And where did I even imply that I supported Bush, Nixon or Cheney? I'm pointing out to the impeachbots how impractical, if not impossible, it would be. There are other roads to justice than impeachment.

Take your Nixon comment and shove it up your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. We've heard all the excuses
but you know what... the HOUSE refered it to Commitee by MAJORITY vote

I guess Kucinich was better at this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Whatever.
You'll get impeachment when the humpback whales fly. Why don't you rail impotently against that, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. Keep supporting what is there and guess what you get?
Without accountability nothing else matters...If you don't support the Constitution then what is it all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Who's supporting "what is there"?
I think impeachment is impractical, and justice can be served in other ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
travelingtypist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Is impeachment the right thing or not? Yes or no?
Have Bush/Cheney committed impeachable offenses? Yes or no?

If yes, the impeaching them is not optional. Upholding the
Constitution and fulfilling their oath demands that Bush and
Cheney at least be indicted, then tried.

It's not about politics. The Dems are making people angrier
at them because they are playing politics and refusing to do
the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Wow, it's a good thing our police don't work this way
If they had to worry about the effect on their election campaigns every time they went to arrest a suspect, we'd be in deep shit.

Oh, kinda like WE ARE because the cops in Congress won't do their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I do give a damn, but agree with your point. Whoever 'inherits' this mess
has a daunting task before them. That's why it's so important to get it right!

And these pieces of human excrement who accomplished so many negatives, who have blood running, who made a farce of our Constitution, need to be held to account for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Whoever inherits it
will likely sweep it under the proverbial rug and pretend it never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know what you mean...
And that's not to mention that the Criminal in Chief stole the white house from Al Gore, and shouldn't have been there in the first place.
However, we have to care about 2008. Can you say President Guiliani?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It will be a landslide in 2008
KY & VA went blue. The job of congress is to do their jobs as per the Constitution
not to make sure they get re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. It may not be a landslide because Democrats are FED UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. yeah, they're fed up with Republicans
despite what boobirds like you keep pushing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. curent CNN poll shows the discontent is the highest ever
and four out of ten want their rep out... by the way usually it is two in ten

So don't count on that...

Or you may feel the wall of bricks falling down.. called reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. "discontent" is going to translate into people sitting this one out?
I would think the opposite is true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh how I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. None of them have ever said impeachment isn't warranted
I think the reservations about rather or not it would be successful and right now there just aren't the votes to convict. If they get handed an acquittal, that would be a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Tired of that argument
its been debunked many times. You don't need the majority of votes to start the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Those two punks need life sentences stacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. I do. I give a damn.
I'd like to see bush and cheney impeached, but regardless, it's vital to increase the dem majority in both houses, and elect a dem as president. Then we will see change: Habeas restore, the troops returning from Iraq, SCHIP passed, Guantanamo closed, a saner foreign policy, progress on climate change, environmental action, taxes raised on the wealthy, etc. And those things count to me every bit as much as impeaching bush/cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. THANK-YOU! I'm with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Is impeachment dead forever?
Will every future president who breaks the law say when challenged: So what? Bush and Cheney were never held accountable (not just via impeachment).

We can restore all the laws, install a Democratic president and hope for the best.

Still, what happens if and when there is Republican president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. And really, how bad do you have to be to get impeached? This situation
doesn't qualify 'now'?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. America is about "the people, not "the leaders".
Edited on Fri Nov-09-07 10:05 PM by Gregorian
That's the way I see it, at least.

If the American people wake up, and America returns and becomes what it should be, then Bush and Cheney can walk into the sunset holding hands, as far as I'm concerned.

I've always felt that there was a bigger picture than punishment. After all, those who commit crimes are often their own punishment.

Let's keep working on America. Bush and Cheney have distracted us enough. Oh, and I'm totally committed to impeachment.

And I totally understand your thoughts. It would be fun to see them hang. Sort of. But if they did hang, and America was still smouldering, what good would that do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let them stay in ofc and continue to screwup.
If they impeach Chaney, BUsh will appoint a new VP, then when Bush is impeached the VP steps in and replaces him, and appoints a new VP. People may decide to give these people a chance of their own. So I would rather see Bush//Cheney tried for war crimes by some of the countries abroad. Could be some in Congress are thinking along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I predict: HRC will issue blanket pardons for the lot of them.
Or at least for GW, since *he'll* pardon the lot of 'em the day before he leaves office.
HRC will then pardon dubya or at least "not pursue investigations for the sake of moving the country forward" or some such bullshit, just like her sainted husband did with Poppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. and say we need to heal the country (while Jeb is planning a return and w is laughing
all the way to the bank.)

Bill Clinton didn't bother with past abuses when he had the chance (think BCCI, Iran Contra, Marc Rich, Mena Airport) so why should we expect different from HRC?

We need a leader who is willing to REALLY CLEAN UP THE MESS KNOWN AS BFEE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotGivingUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. You took the words right out of my mouth. I couldn't agree more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. k&r
doesn't matter who gets elected if they do not face judgment then america is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC