Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Response to fuel spill under Bay Bridge called 'unusually slow' (S.F. Chronicle)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:28 AM
Original message
Response to fuel spill under Bay Bridge called 'unusually slow' (S.F. Chronicle)
(So, has Governor AaaaNold NOT been bragging about this one? Never fear though, I'm sure *bush will find some way to blame this one on the Local officials instead of his beloved Republican Governor.)

Make sure you check out the 40+ pictures that go with this story at this link:
<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2007/11/09/MNVQT8TN3.DTL&o=1>

Response to fuel spill under Bay Bridge called 'unusually slow'


Jonathan Curiel, Kevin Fagan, Peter Fimrite,Pat Yollin, Chronicle Staff Writers

Friday, November 9, 2007

(11-08) 22:14 PST San Francisco --

Emergency officials were pressured Thursday to explain why it took them hours to announce that 58,000 gallons of oil had leaked from a container ship that rammed the Bay Bridge on Wednesday - creating a slick that has contaminated beaches and injured hundreds of birds from Hunters Point to the Marin Headlands and out to the Farallon Islands....

(edit)

..."Why did it take them so long to respond?" complained Mike Herz, founder of the San Francisco Baykeeper organization and chairman of U.S. Friends of the Earth. "Every oil spill I've ever seen has screwups of one kind or another. "But it looks like they've been unusually slow in responding in this one."...

(edit)

...Oil began leaking into the water after the 65,131-ton, 810-foot-long ship crashed into the base of a tower of the Bay Bridge's western span in heavy fog at about 8:30 a.m. Wednesday. Within an hour, six emergency vessels from the Coast Guard and Marine Spill Response Corp. were on the scene, Uberti said. Yet up until 4 p.m., officials apparently believed only 140 gallons of oil had leaked into the water.

They then learned that the actual amount of the spill was a much more alarming 58,000 gallons, Uberti said. That news was not announced to the public and some local officials until 9 p.m.
"We were kind of busy. ... We were busy figuring this stuff out,":silly: Uberti said when asked about the delay....

(more at link) <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/11/09/MNVQT8TN3.DTL>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. It looks like the spill is all over the bay and not the coast.
Welcome to Bush Amerika. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. How do you mistake 140 gallons for 58,000?
Somethings screwy here. I did hear that the Korean captain was cited for some kind of similar infraction last year. Has he been getting lessons from Captain Hazelwood?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Almost sounds like deliberate ignorance, huh?
Yes, definitely something screwy here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I asked that last week
Word is that the ship's crew have been sued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are you sure NORAD wasn't in charge?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC