to take this public.
THE SILENCE BY DEM LEADERSHIP, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE DLC (since they played the most prominent leadership role) WAS DEAFENING. I BELIEVE YOU SHOULD ASK YOURSELF WHO BENEFITTED W/IN THE D's FROM A GORE "LOSS"? FIRST..GORE BROKE WITH THE DLC TO BECOME A POPULIST:
Published on Sunday, August 20. 2000 in the Boston Globe
Thank You, Al Gore
by Robert Kuttner
A funny thing happened to Al Gore on the way to his surprisingly effective acceptance speech. He became a liberal.
The speech was as liberal as anything FDR or LBJ or Jesse Jackson or one of the Kennedys might have delivered. It was built around a commitment to fight for ordinary people, against large and powerful interests. This, of course, is precisely what made it effective.
The emotional heart of the speech, Gore's honoring of four ordinary American lives, did not just salute the struggles of workaday families, the way Ronald Reagan often did. It identified who was dishonoring their struggles - corporations. He singled out heartless HMOs who pressure a family to sacrifice a child; drug companies that force a pensioner to choose between food and medicine; corporate polluters; corporations that pay workers inadequate wages.
And he identified the solution: strong, reliable public Social Security; better Medicare; welfare reform that rewards work rather than punishing the needy; higher minimum wages; and more investment in public - not voucher - schools, so that working families don't have to send kids to crumbling classrooms.
What is the evil? Corporate power. What is the remedy? Effective government.
-snip
http://www.commondreams.org/views/082000-105.htmSECOND, AFTER GORE'S WIN THEY BLAME HIS 'LOSS' ON BREAKING WITH THE DLC:
Strange Theory on Why Gore Lost
The so-called Democratic Leadership Council has decided that Al Gore should have acted more like a Republican in order to win the 2000 presidential electoral college vote in addition to his nationwide popular vote victory. This strange finding has drawn some attention, including coverage by the Associated Press and the Environmental News Service -- we have a few excerpts from their reports for you here.
Al Gore, the self-styled environmental candidate in the 2000 Presidential election, lost his bid for the White House because he campaigned on an outdated "populist" platform that was too liberal for most Americans, according to a new report drafted by the Democratic Leadership Council.
The 40-page report, titled "Why Gore Lost, And How Democrats Can Come Back," concludes that the Democratic Party must move towards the political right -- towards the Republicans -- if it wants to regain control of Congress in 2002 and the White House in 2004.
Al From, the DLC's founder and CEO, opened a freewheeling discussion forum by arguing that Democrat Al Gore made a huge tactical mistake by continually emphasizing that he would "fight for the people and not the powerful" as the nation's first president of the 21st Century.
-snip
http://www.progress.org/goredlc2.htmYEAH RIGHT. THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN AND THE PARTY LEADERSHIP PUSHED FOR CONFORMITY IN SILENCE. WHY DIDN'T THEY FIGHT TO MAKE THE KNOWLEDGE OF THIS PUBLIC? WHY IS THE DLC STILL REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE GORE WON?