Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revealed: the little-known device used to block Democrats in the House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:23 PM
Original message
Revealed: the little-known device used to block Democrats in the House
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2198227,00.html

Republicans use obscure motion 16 times in a year, compared to just 14 for the Democrats in more than a decade of opposition

Elana Schor in Washington
Wednesday October 24, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

All year long, Democrats in the House of Representatives have watched with increasing impatience as their Senate counterparts find themselves bedevilled by a filibuster-wielding Republican minority. On measures criticising the war in Iraq, the House has passed four since May to the Senate's zero; on annual spending bills, the House has cleared all 12 to the Senate's six.

That Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and his Senate Republican colleagues routinely have blocked the Democrats from getting the needed 60 votes on many measures has received considerable press attention, even inspiring a splashy "anti-obstruction" media campaign. snip

But the biggest MTR intrusion of the year came last week, when the Republicans stalled a bill to provide greater judicial oversight of secret wiretapping by the Bush administration with a proposed MTR that even critics begrudgingly called clever. The motion provided that no court order would be needed to tap the phones of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida members - a caveat that frustrated Democrats noted was already in their measure. snip

Faced with the choice between limiting Republican attempts to split their caucus and prodding those members to resist the MTRs, Democrats are likely to choose the latter, at least for the time being. The Republicans' 30-second campaign ad on the wiretapping motion may write itself - featuring ominous Bin Laden visuals and a voiceover murmuring, "Democratic congressman X voted to stop the government from listening to terrorists' phone calls" - but the party's nearly 10-to-1 fundraising advantage over Republicans helps take the sting out of that threat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't the Dems use all the tools at their disposal?
If I was a Congressman, there would be an impeachment hearing once per week, and I'd filibuster EVERYTHING the refucklicans try to do.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If we had a fair media I would agree
But we don't. Our media will portray the sick bastard as some kind of martyr that them mean old Dems keep picking on. The thugs will have Chimpy (and his daddy) out crying like a baby at news conferences over it. And it would work for the Rethugs with their complicit media too.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Disagree, the tactics are not working any more even with the complicit media
it may strike you as strange but the meme that the dems have no backbone is now confirmed.. due to the actions of live and let live
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. the meme that the dems have no backbone is now confirmed - By whom? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because they're losers
who refuse to fight for traditional Democratic vales, choosing instead to enable and legitimize the far right- and enrich their coffers in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. make em stand up and show the world they would read a phone book than help poor sick kiss.. make the...
visible

quit F'n wimp'n out..!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC